Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T15:56:41.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Base-Free Measure of Change Proposed by Tucker, Damarin and Messick

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Lloyd Bond
Lloyd Bond*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Lloyd Bond, Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tucker, Damarin and Messick proposed a “base-free” measure of change which involves the computation of residual scores that are uncorrelated with true scores on the pretest. The present note discusses this change measure and demonstrates that, because of an incorrect derivation by the authors, properties they attribute to α (the coefficient for the regression of true scores from the second testing on true scores from the first testing) are, in fact, properties of b, the ordinary regression coefficient. A correct derivation of the initial position—change correlation in terms of α is obtained, and Tucker et al.'s discussion of the “law of initial values” is reconsidered.

Keywords

base-free measure of changedifference scoresmeasuring change
Type
Notes And Comments
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , September 1979 , pp. 351 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The preparation of this paper was supported by the Learning Research and Development Center supported in part as a research and development center by funds from the National Institute of Education.

References

Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. How we should measure “change”—or should we?. Psychological Bulletin, 1970, 74, 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. W. Problems in measuring change, 1963, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Lacey, J. I. & Lacey, B. C. The law of initial value in the longitudinal study of autonomic constitution: Reproducibility of autonomic responses and response patterns over a four year interval. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1962, 28, 1257–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M. The measurement of growth. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1956, 16, 421–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M. Further problems in the measurement of growth. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1958, 18, 437–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, W. H. & Dubois, P. H. Correlational methods in research on human learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1962, 15, 287–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNemar, Q. On growth measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1958, 18, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, E. F. Jr. Extending classical test theory to the measurement of change. Review of Educational Research, 1972, 42, 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, E. F. Jr. Response to Cronbach and Furby's “How we should measure ‘change’—or should we?. Psychological Bulletin, 1972, 78, 159–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. M. Jr. A simulation study comparing procedures for assessing individual educational growth. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, 68, 603–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. M. Jr. A simulation study of the use of change measures to compare educational programs. American Educational Research Journal, 1975, 12, 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, G. H. A formula to correct for the effect of errors of measurement on the correlation of initial values with gains. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1924, 7, 321–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, G. H. An alternative formula for the true correlation of initial values with gains. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1925, 8, 323–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, L. R., Damarin, F., & Messick, S. A base-free measure of change. Psychometrika, 1966, 31, 457–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zieve, L. Note on the correlation of initial scores with gains. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1940, 31, 391–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar