Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:55:56.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Prediction of Choice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

L. L. Thurstone*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago

Abstract

This paper is concerned with a central concept in social measurement such as opinion polls, the measurement of attitudes, the prediction of political elections, the measurement of moral values, the measurement of consumer preferences, the measurement of utility, and the measurement of aesthetic values. The concept is that of the discriminal dispersion and its interesting effects in the prediction of choice.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1945 Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Thurstone, L. L. Equally often noticed differences. J. educ. Psychol, 1927, 18, 289293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. A law of comparative judgment. Psychol. Rev., 1927, 34, 273286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. Psychophysical analysis. Amer. J. Psychol, 1927, 38, 368389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. A mental unit of measurement. Psychol. Rev., 1927, 34, 415423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. Three psychophysical laws. Psychol. Rev., 1927, 34, 424432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. Experimental study of nationality preferences. J. gen Psychol., 1928, 1, 405425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. Fechner's law and the method of equal appearing intervals. J. exp. Psychol., 1929, 12, 214224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. The indifference function. J. soc. Psychol, 1931, 2, 139167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. Rank order as a psychophysical method. J. exp. Psychol, 1931, 14, 187201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. Ability, motivation, and speed. Psychometrika, 1937, 2, 249254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar