Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-xx4dx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T07:29:37.417Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Probability Matrix Decomposition Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Eric Maris ,
Paul De Boeck  and
Iven Van Mechelen
Eric Maris*
Affiliation:
University of Nijmegen
Paul De Boeck
Affiliation:
University of Leuven
Iven Van Mechelen
Affiliation:
University of Leuven
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Eric Maris, Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and Information, Department of Mathematical Psychology, University of Nijmegen, PO Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, THE NETHERLANDS (E-mall: U212776@VM.UCI.KUN.NL).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a class of models for two-way matrices with binary entries of 0 and 1. First, we consider Boolean matrix decomposition, conceptualize it as a latent response model (LRM) and, by making use of this conceptualization, generalize it to a larger class of matrix decomposition models. Second, probability matrix decomposition (PMD) models are introduced as a probabilistic version of this larger class of deterministic matrix decomposition models. Third, an algorithm for the computation of the maximum likelihood (ML) and the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimates of the parameters of PMD models is presented. This algorithm is an EM-algorithm, and is a special case of a more general algorithm that can be used for the whole class of LRMs. And fourth, as an example, a PMD model is applied to data on decision making in psychiatric diagnosis.

Keywords

Boolean matrix decompositionlatent response modelclusteringtwo-way dataincomplete dataEM-algorithmpsychiatric diagnosis
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , March 1996 , pp. 7 - 29
Copyright
© 1996 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper is based on a chapter of the first author's doctoral dissertation, written at the University of Leuven and supervised by Paul De Boeck.

References

Albert, A., Anderson, J. A. (1984). On the existence of maximum likelihood estimates in logistic regression models. Biometrika, 71, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1980). The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 2nd ed.,, Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Arabie, P., Hubert, L. J. (1992). Combinatorial data analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 169–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, R. D., Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candel, M., & Maris, E. (1994). Probability matrix decomposition: Perceptual analysis of two-way two-mode binary data. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Coombs, C. H. (1964). A theory of data, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
De Boeck, P. (1986). HICLAS computer program: version 1.0, Leuven, Belgium: University of Leuven.Google Scholar
De Boeck, P., Rosenberg, S. (1988). Hierarchical classes: Model and data analysis. Psychometrika, 53, 361–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM Algorithm (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, G. H. (1974). Einfuhrung in die Theorie psychologischer Tests [Introduction to the theory of psychological tests], Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
Gertsbakh, I. B. (1989). Statistical reliability theory, New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and applications of correspondence analysis, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jannarone, R. J., Yu, K. F., Laughlin, J. E. (1990). Easy Bayes estimates for Rasch-type models. Psychometrika, 55, 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. H. (1982). Boolean matrix theory, New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Maris, E. (1992). Psychometric models for psychological processes and structures, Belgium: University of Leuven.Google Scholar
Maris, E. (1995). Psychometric latent response models. Psychometrika, 60, 523–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mickey, M. R., Mundle, P., Engelman, L. (1983). Boolean factor analysis. In Dixon, W. J. (Eds.), BMDP statistical software (pp. 538–546). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mood, A. M., Graybill, F. A., Boes, D. C. (1974). Introduction to the theory of statistics, London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Nishisato, S. (1980). Analysis of categorical data: Dual scaling and its applications, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novick, M. R., Jackson, P. H. (1974). Statistical methods for educational and psychological research, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Van Mechelen, I., De Boeck, P. (1990). Projection of binary criterion into a model of hierarchical classes. Psychometrika, 55, 677–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Mechelen, I., De Boeck, P., Rosenberg, S. (1995). The conjunctive hierarchical classes model. Psychometrika, 60, 505–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C. F. J. (1983). On the convergence properties of the EM-algorithm. The Annals of Statistics, 11, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar