Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T02:26:32.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychometrics, Psychonomics, Psychonometrics: Rejoinder to Rouder and Wenger

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Gerard J. P. Van Breukelen
Gerard J. P. Van Breukelen*
Affiliation:
Maastricht University, The Netherlands
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Gerard J.P. Van Breukelen, Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. E-mail: gerard.vbreukelen@stat.unimaas.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 70 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 389 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This revised article was published online in June 2005 with all corrections incorporated.

References

Cohen, A.C. (1988). Three-parameter estimation. In Crow, E.L., & Shimizu, K. (Eds.), Lognormal Distributions: Theory and Applications. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Cox, D.R. (1998). Discussion. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 387–389.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, R.D. (1997). Several unresolved conceptual problems of mathematical psychology. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouder, J.N. (2005) Are unshifted distributional models appropriate for response time? Psychometrika, 70, in pressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouder, J.N., Sun, D., Speckman, P.L., Lu, J., & Zhou, D. (2003). A hierarchical Bayesian framework for response time distributions. Psychometrika, 68, 587–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snijders, T.A.B., Bosker, R.J. (1999). Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (1989). Concentration, Speed and Precision in Mental Tests: a Psychonometric Approach. PhD thesis. The Netherlands: Nijmegen University.Google Scholar
Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (1995). Psychometric and information processing properties of selected response time models. Psychometrika, 60, 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (1995). Parallel processing models compatible with lognormally distributed response times. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 396–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Breukelen, G.J.P., Roskam, E.E.Ch.I., Eling, P.A.T.M., Jansen, R.W.T.L., Souren, D.A.P.B., & Ickenroth, J.G.M. (1995). A model and diagnostic measures for response time series on tests of concentration. Brain and Cognition, 27, 147–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, M.J. (2005) Models for the statistics and mechanisms of response speed and accuracy: comment on Van Breukelen. Psychometrika, 70: in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, M.J., & Gibson, B.S. (2004). Using hazard functions to assess changes in processing capacity in an attentional cueing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 708–719.Google Scholar