Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Greeny, M B
1981.
Regional Preferences for Interlocking Directorates among the Largest American Corporations.
Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 7,
p.
829.
Levine, David M.
1981.
Sampling distributions of kruskal's measure of stress for an asymmetric matrix.
Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 4,
p.
395.
SACKETT, PAUL R.
CORNELIUS, EDWIN T.
and
CARRON, THEODORE J.
1981.
A COMPARISON OF GLOBAL JUDGMENT VS. TASK ORIENTED APPROACHES TO JOB CLASSIFICATION.
Personnel Psychology,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 4,
p.
791.
Rounds, James B.
and
Zevon, Michael A.
1983.
Multidimensional Scaling Research in Vocational Psychology.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 4,
p.
491.
Spence, Ian
1983.
Monte Carlo Simulation Studies.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 4,
p.
405.
Brockhoff, Klaus
and
Waldeck, Bernd
1984.
The robustness of PREFMAP-2.
International Journal of Research in Marketing,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 3,
p.
215.
PHIPPS, ALAN G.
and
CARTER, JACQUELYN E.
1985.
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN THE RESIDENTIAL PREFERENCES OF INNER‐CITY HOMEOWNERS.
Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie,
Vol. 76,
Issue. 1,
p.
32.
Fenton, D. Mark
1985.
Dimensions of meaning in the perception of natural settings and their relationship to aesthetic response.
Australian Journal of Psychology,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 3,
p.
325.
Torgerson, Warren S.
1986.
Scaling and Psychometrika: Spatial and alternative representations of similarity data.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 1,
p.
57.
WHELEHAN, O.P.
MACFIE, H.J.H.
and
BAUST, N.G.
1987.
USE OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES SCALING FOR SENSORY STUDIES: SIMULATED RECOVERY OF STRUCTURE UNDER VARIOUS MISSING VALUE RATES AND ERROR LEVELS.
Journal of Sensory Studies,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Malhotra, Naresh K.
Jain, Arun K.
and
Pinson, Christian
1988.
The Robustness of MDS Configurations in the Case of Incomplete Data.
Journal of Marketing Research,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 1,
p.
95.
Fenton, Mark
and
Pearce, Philip
1988.
Multidimensional scaling and tourism research.
Annals of Tourism Research,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 2,
p.
236.
Kumar, V.
and
Leone, Robert P.
1991.
Nonlinear mapping: An alternative to multidimensional scaling for product positioning.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 3,
p.
165.
Rodgers, Joseph Lee
1991.
Matrix and Stimulus Sample Sizes in the Weighted MDS Model: Empirical Metric Recovery Functions.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 1,
p.
71.
Schader, M.
and
Gaul, W.
1992.
Analyzing and Modeling Data and Knowledge.
p.
107.
Weinberg, Sharon L.
and
Menil, Violeta C.
1993.
The Recovery of Structure in Linear and Ordinal Data: INDSCAL versus ALSCAL.
Multivariate Behavioral Research,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 2,
p.
215.
Kleiss, James A.
1995.
Visual Scene Properties Relevant for Simulating Low-Altitude Flight: A Multidimensional Scaling Approach.
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 4,
p.
711.
Kleiss, James A.
1996.
Assessing the Influence of Operational Factors on the Perceived Structure of Real-World Scenes Viewed During Low-Altitude, High-Speed Flight.
The International Journal of Aviation Psychology,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 4,
p.
335.
Kleiss, James A.
1996.
Assessing the perceived structure of flight simulator visual scenes using multidimensional scaling.
Displays,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 1,
p.
37.
Krabbe, Paul F.M.
Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise
and
Bonsel, Gouke J.
1997.
The comparability and reliability of five health-state valuation methods.
Social Science & Medicine,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 11,
p.
1641.