Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T17:25:39.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Relative Efficiency of Two Tests as a Function of Ability Level

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Frederic M. Lord*
Affiliation:
Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N. J.

Abstract

A new formula is developed for the relative efficiency of two tests measuring the same trait. The formula expresses relative efficiency solely in terms of the standard errors of measurement and, surprisingly, the frequency distributions of true scores. Approximate methods for estimating relative efficiency may make this function routinely available. A numerical illustration compares new and old estimates of relative efficiency for subtests from the Scholastic Aptitude Test.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Research reported in this paper has been supported by grant GB-32781X from National Science Foundation.

References

Birnbaum, A. Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R. (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley. 1968, 453479Google Scholar
Brogden, H. E. New problems for old solutions. Psychometrika, 1957, 22, 301309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, M. G. and Stuart, A. The advanced theory of statistics. Vol. 2, 1961, New York: HafnerGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M. A theory of test scores. Psychometric Monograph No. 7. Psychometric Society, 1952.Google Scholar
Lord, F. M. A strong true-score theory, with applications. Psychometrika, 1965, 30, 239270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M. Estimating true-score distributions in psychological testing (an empirical Bayes estimation problem). Psychometrika, 1969, 34, 259299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M. Tailored testing, an application of stochastic approximation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1971, 66, 707711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M. Estimation of latent ability and item parameters when there are omitted responses. Psychometrika, 1974, in press. (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M. Quick estimates of the relative efficiency of two tests as a function of ability level. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1974, in press. (b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, C. R. Linear statistical inference and its applications, 1965, New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Stocking, M., Wingersky, M. S., Lees, D. M., Lennon, V. and Lord, F. M. A program for estimating the relative efficiency of tests at various ability levels, for equating true scores, and for predicting bivariate distributions of observed scores, 1973, Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing ServiceGoogle Scholar
Wingersky, M. S., Lees, D. M., Lennon, V. and Lord, F. M. A computer program for estimating true-score distributions and graduating observed-score distributions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1969, 29, 689692CrossRefGoogle Scholar