Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T16:22:41.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Repeated Measurements Analysis of Variance when the Correlations have a Certain Pattern

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Sylvan Wallenstein  and
Joseph L. Fleiss
Sylvan Wallenstein*
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Joseph L. Fleiss
Affiliation:
Columbia University
*
Reprint requests should be sent to Sylvan Wallenstein, Division of Biostatistics, Columbia University School of Public Health, 600 West 168 Street, New York, New York 10032.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Consider a repeated measurements study in which a single observation is taken at each of t(t > 2) equally spaced time points for each of n subjects. This paper uses a result of Box to find the appropriate multiplicative correction term for the degrees of freedom in the analysis of variance table for the case when there is equal variability per time point, and when the correlation between observations u time units apart is equal to ρu. For large values of t, the multiplicative correction has a lower bound approximately equal to 2.5/(t − 1).

Keywords

repeated measurementsanalysis of varianceadjusted degrees of freedompatterned correlation matrix
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , June 1979 , pp. 229 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr. Fleiss is also with the Biometrics Research Unit of the New York State Psychiatric Institute. This work was supported in part by grant DE 04068 from the National Institute of Dental Research.

References

Box, G. E. P. Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems. II. Effects of inequality of variance and of correlation between errors in the two-way classification. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1954, 25, 484–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, R. O., Baker, F. B. M., Mandeville, G. K., & Hayes, T. F. Estimates of test size for several test procedures based on conventional variance ratios in the repeated measures design. Psychometrika, 1967, 32, 339–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elston, R. C. & Grizzle, J. E. Estimation of time response curves and their confidence bands. Biometrics, 1962, 18, 148–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geisser, S. & Greenhouse, S. W. An extension of Box's results on the use of the F-statistic in multivariate analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1958, 29, 885–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhouse, S. W. & Geisser, S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 1959, 24, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huynh, H. Some approximate tests for repeated measurement designs. Psychometrika, 1978, 43, 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huynh, H. & Feldt, L. S. Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in randomized block and split-plot designs. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1976, 1, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machin, D. On a design problem in growth studies. Biometrics, 1975, 31, 749–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pothoff, R. F. & Roy, S. N. A generalized multivariate analysis of variance model useful especially for growth curve problems. Biometrika, 1964, 51, 313–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoloff, P. H. Correcting for heterogeneity of covariance for repeated measures designs of the analysis of variance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1970, 30, 909–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar