Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T19:39:07.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Selective Efficiency of a Test Battery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Herbert S. Sichel*
Affiliation:
National Institute for Personnel Research, South African Council for Scientific and Industrial Research

Abstract

In industrial acceptance sampling one frequently makes use of operating characteristic curves to describe the discriminating power of a particular sampling plan. Similarly, it is possible to demonstrate the selective efficiency of a test battery in terms of (a) the Applicant's Operating Characteristic (A.O.C.); (b) the Selector's Operating Characteristic (S.O.C.). The A.O.C. determines the chance of selection by means of a test for any given level of true ability. The S.O.C. connects functionally probability of success on the criterion with the predictor scores of a battery. For the case of a normal bivariate distribution the exact mathematical expressions of the OC curves are derived in terms of the correlation coefficient ρ, the cut-off points α and β, and the predictor and criterion scores X and Y (in standard measures). The Efficiency Index H is defined as the percentage of successful subjects gained by the use of a test battery, taking chance selection as a yardstick for comparison. Its optimum, for fixed ρ and α, is derived. The distribution law of the criterion scores of selectees is deduced and its first four moments are shown to depart little from normality for cases usually encountered in practice. A “Quality-Gainae” diagram graphically illustrates the improvements secured. Another simple device, the “Cost-Utility” diagram, explains to management the full implications of selecting personnel by means of a test battery. Neither of the diagrams requires an understanding of the correlation coefficient. The confidence belt of the OC curves, the standard error of the mean criterion score of selectees and the standard error of the predicted number of successful applicants are determined. Finally, the full theory is applied in detail to a real test battery.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1952 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper is the result of an investigation undertaken by the South African National Institute for Personnel Research, Johannesburg, and was completed at the Educational Testing Service, Princeton. The author wishes to thank these organizations for permission to publish this paper.

References

McClelland, W. Selection for secondary education, London: Univ. of London Press, 1942.Google Scholar
Bittner, R. H., and Wilder, C. E. Expectancy tables: a method of interpreting correlation coefficients. J. exp. Educ., 1946, 14, 245252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, W. V. Great expectations. Personnel Psych., 1949, 2, 397404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, H. C., and Russell, J. T. The relationship of validity coefficients in the practical effectiveness of tests in selection: Tables and Discussions. J. appl. Psych., 1939, 23, 565578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brogden, H. E. When testing pays off. Personnel Psych., 1949, 2, 170183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrett, R. F. Per cent increase in output of selected personnel as an index of test efficiency. J. appl. Psych., 1948, 32, 135145.Google Scholar
Berkson, J. “Cost-utility” as a measure of the efficiency of a test. J. Amer. statist. Ass., 1947, 42, 246255.Google ScholarPubMed
Kendall, M. G. The advanced theory of statistics, Vol. II, London: Charles Griffin and Co., 1946.Google Scholar
Hald, A. Statistiske metoder, Tabel-Og formelsamling. Copenhagen, 1948, pp. 54-55.Google Scholar