Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-2kk5n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T06:57:22.423Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false

A Similarity-Based Smoothing Approach to Nondimensional Item Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

J. O. Ramsay*
Affiliation:
McGill University
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to J. O. Ramsay, Department of Psychology, McGill University, 1205 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal, Quebec H3A IBl CANADA.

Abstract

The probability that an examinee chooses a particular option within an item is estimated by averaging over the responses to that item of examinees with similar response patterns for the whole test. The approach does not presume any latent variable structure or any dimensionality. But simulated and actual data analyses are presented to show that when the responses are determined by a latent ability variable, this similarity-based smoothing procedure can reveal the dimensionality of ability very satisfactorily.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author wishes to acknowledge the support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through grant A320, and to thank Educational Testing Service for making the data on the Advanced Placement Chemistry Exam available.

References

Aitchison, J. (1986). The statistical analysis of compositional data, London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, R. A., Chambers, J. M., Wilks, A. R. (1988). The new S language, Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Bock, R. D., Gibbons, R. D., Muraki, E. (1985). Full-information item factor analysis, Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.Google Scholar
Cleveland, W. S., Mallows, C. L., McRae, J. E. (1993). ATS methods: Nonparametric regression for non-Gaussian data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 811820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gower, J. C., Legendre, P. (1986). Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients. Journal of Classification, 3, 548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications, Boston: Kluwer-Nyjhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, M. V. (1984). An introduction to multilinear formula score theory, Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Department of Educational Psychology, Model-Based Measurement Laboratory.Google Scholar
Muraki, E. (1990). Fitting a polytomous item response model to Likert-type data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 5971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J. O. (1991). Kernel smoothing approaches to nonparametric item characteristic curve estimation. Psychometrika, 56, 611630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J. O. (1993). TESTGRAF: A computer program for nonparametric analysis of testing data. unpublished manuscript, McGill University.Google Scholar
Samejima, F. (1984). Plausibility functions of Iowa Vocabulary Test items estimated by the simple sum procedure of the conditional P.D.F. approach, Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee, Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
Scott, D. W. (1992). Multivariate density estimation: Theory, practice, and visualization, New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seber, G. A. F. (1984). Multivariate observations, New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, B. W. (1985). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis, London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Stout, W. F. (1987). A nonparametric approach for assessing latent trait dimensinality. Psychometrika, 52, 589618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, W. F. (1990). A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation. Psychometrika, 55, 293325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar