Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T00:38:52.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Simultaneous Analysis of Multivariate Polytomous Variates in Several Groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Sik-Yum Lee*
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Wai-Yin Poon
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
P. M. Bentler*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Sik-Yum Lee, Department of Statistics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N. T. HONG KONG, or to P. M. Bentler, Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024-1563.
Requests for reprints should be sent to Sik-Yum Lee, Department of Statistics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N. T. HONG KONG, or to P. M. Bentler, Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024-1563.

Abstract

The frequencies of m independent p-way contingency tables are analyzed by a model that assumes that the ordinal categorical data in each of m groups are generated from a latent continuous multivariate normal distribution. The parameters of these multivariate distributions and of the relations between the ordinal and latent variables are estimated by maximum likelihood. Goodness-of-fit statistics based on the likelihood ratio criterion and the Pearsonian chisquare are provided to test the hypothesis that the proposed model is correct, that is, it fits the observed sample data. Hypotheses on the invariance of means, variances, and polychoric correlations of the latent variables across populations are tested by Wald statistics. The method is illustrated on an example involving data on three five-point ordinal scales obtained from male and female samples.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported in part by research grant DA01070 from the U.S. Public Health Service. The authors are indebted to anonymous reviewers for some very valuable suggestions. The assistance of J. Speckart in manuscript production is also gratefully acknowledged.

References

Agresti, A. (1984). Analysis of ordinal categorical data, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Andrich, D. (1979). A model for contingency tables having an ordered response classification. Biometrics, 35, 403415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashford, J. R., Sowden, R. R. (1970). Multivariate probit analysis. Biometrics, 26, 535546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., Holland, P. W. (1980). Discrete multivariate analysis 6th ed,, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bock, R. D. (1975). Multivariate statistical methods in behavioral research, New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Bock, R. D., Jones, L. V. (1968). The measurement and prediction of judgment and choice, San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Goodman, L. A. (1981). Three elementary views of loglinear models for the analysis of cross-classifications having ordered categories. In Leinhardt, S. (Eds.), Sociological Methdology (pp. 193239). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Goodman, L. A. (1986). Some useful extensions of the usual correspondence analysis approach and the usual loglinear models approach in the analysis of contingency tables. International Statistical Review, 54, 243309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumbel, E. J. (1961). Bivariate logistic distributions. Journal of American Statistical Association, 56, 335349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberman, S. J. (1974). The analysis of frequency data, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huba, G. J., Bentler, P. M. (1982). A developmental theory of drug use: Derivation and assessment of a causal modeling approach. In Baltes, P. B., Brim, O. G. Jr. (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior, Volume 4 (pp. 147203). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S. (1972). Distribution in statistics: Continuous multivariate distribution, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lee, S.-Y. (1985). Maximum likelihood estimation of polychoric correlations in r ×s ×t contingency tables. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 23, 5367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.-Y. (1985). On testing functional constraints in structural equation models. Biometrika, 66, 539545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.-Y., Jennrich, R. I. (1979). A study of algorithms for covariance structure analysis with specific comparisons using factor analysis. Psychometrika, 43, 99113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.-Y., Poon, W.-Y. (1986). Maximum likelihood estimation of polyserial correlation. Psychometrika, 51, 113121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcomb, M. D., Bentler, P. M. (1988). Consequences of adolescent drug use: Impact on the lives of young adults, Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Newcomb, M. D., Bentler, P. M., Collins, C. (1986). Alcohol use and dissatisfaction with self and life: A longitudinal analysis of young adults. Journal of Drug Issues, 16, 479494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishisato, S. (1980). Analysis of categorical data: Dual scaling and its applications, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, U. (1979). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 44, 443460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poon, W.-Y., Lee, S.-Y. (1987). Maximum likelihood estimation of multivariate polyserial and polychoric correlation coefficients. Psychometrika, 52, 409430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, C. R. (1973). Linear statistical inference and its applications, New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schervish, M. J. (1984). Multivariate normal probabilities with error bound. Applied Statistics, 33, 8194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallis, G. (1962). The maximum likelihood estimation of correlation from contingency tables. Biometrics, 18, 342353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar