Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:16:32.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Simultaneous Nonlinear Prediction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Jean J. Fortier*
Affiliation:
S. M. A. Inc., Montreal

Abstract

A previous article was concerned with simultaneous linear prediction. There one was given a set of predictor tests or items and one predicted a set of predictands (also tests or items, or perhaps criteria.) We proposed a simultaneous prediction which was a certain weighted sum of the predictors. In the present article the constraint that the prediction be a weighted sum is relaxed. We seek a general function of the predictors which will maximize the quantity chosen for measuring prediction efficiency. This quantity is the same as the one used in linear prediction and we justify this approach by showing it is the appropriate one when there is only one predictand. In order to solve the problem we restrict consideration to a vector of predictors having only a finite number of possible values, i.e., it possesses discrete probability distribution weights. This can be applied in the case of dichotomous items for instance. It may also be used in continuous distributions as an approximation, by first dividing the original range of values into a finite number of intervals. Then one attributes to the interval the weight corresponding to the probability mass it underlies in the original distribution.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1966 Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This work was initiated at Stanford University under contract 2-10-065 with U. S. Office of Education and was partly revised at the Université de Montréal.

I wish to express my gratitude to Professor Herbert Solomon, Stanford University, for his unfailing assistance at all stages of my work and specially for bringing to my attention the problem of nonlinear prediction in the present context.

References

Fortier, J. J. Simultaneous linear prediction. Psychometrika, 1966, 31, 369381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortier, J. J. Contributions to item selection. Tech. Rep. No. 2, 1962, Lab. of Quant. Research in Ed., Appl. Math., and Statist., Stanford University.Google Scholar
Girshick, M. and Blackwell, D. Decision theory, New York: Wiley, 1954.Google Scholar
Horst, P. Pattern analysis and configural scoring. J. clin. Psychol., 1954, 10, 311.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osburn, H. G. and Lubin, A. The use of configural analysis for the evaluation of test scoring methods. Psychometrika, 1957, 22, 359371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, H. Studies in item analysis and prediction, Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 1961.Google Scholar