Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T14:33:03.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Comments on Wu and Browne

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Rolf Steyer*
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena
Erik Sengewald
Affiliation:
Federal Employment Agency
Sonja Hahn
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena
*
Correspondence should be made to Rolf Steyer, Department of Methodology and Evaluation Research, Institute of Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany. Email: rolf.steyer@uni-jena.de

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Browne, M.W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 6283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K.A., & Long, J.S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Eid, M. (2000). A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions. Psychometrika, 65, 241261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohl, S., & Steyer, R. (2010). Modeling common traits and method effects in multitrait-multimethod analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 4572. doi:10.1080/00273170903504729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pohl, S., Steyer, R., & Kraus, K. (2008). Modelling method effects as individual causal e ects. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 171, 4163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steyer, R., Mayer, A., Geiser, C., & Cole, D. (2015). A theory of states and traits—revised. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 11, 71–98. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar