Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:12:37.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Results Based on a General Stochastic Model for Mental Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

William Meredith
William Meredith*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There have been a number of important developments by several authors which are based on the assumption that test taking behavior is stochastic. That is, it is assumed that the probability that an individual will “endorse” or “pass” a dichotomous item can be represented by some function of an underlying, “latent” attribute (possibly multivariate) called the item trace line or item characteristic curve. Various forms for trace lines have been postulated such as polynomial [9, 11], step function [9], normal ogive [13, 19], and logistic [1, 2]. An interesting model due to Rasch [18] utilizes only a subject parameter and item parameter to determine the probability of passing an item. The only model which does not make some formal assumptions about trace lines is Lazarsfeld's latent class model. All of these models for test behavior are unified by two basic assumptions. One is the stochastic assumption of a probability of passing or endorsing an item.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , December 1965 , pp. 419 - 440
Copyright
Copyright © 1965 Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birnbaum, A. Probability and statistics in item analysis and classification problems. Efficient design and use of tests of mental ability for various decision-making problems. Ser. Rep. No. 58-16, USAF Sch. Aviation Medicine, Randolph AFB, Texas, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, A. Probability and statistics in item analysis and classification problems. On the estimation of mental ability. Ser. Rep. No. 15, USAF Sch. Aviation Medicine, Randolph AFB, Texas, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramér, H. Mathematical methods of statistics, Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1946.Google Scholar
Gibson, W. A. Nonlinear factors in two dimensions. Psychometrika, 1960, 25, 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, B. F. A note on the calculation of weights for maximum battery reliability. Psychometrika, 1950, 15, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulliksen, H. Theory of mental tests, New York: Wiley, 1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. The basis for scalogram analysis. In Stouffer, S. A. et al. (Eds.), Measurement and prediction, Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Horst, P. Matrix algebra for social scientists, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1963.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. The logical and mathematical foundation of latent structure analysis. In Stouffer, S. A. et al. (Eds.), Measurement and prediction. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1950, 362–412.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. A conceptual introduction to latent structure analysis. In Lazarsfeld, P. F. (Eds.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1954, 349–387.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. Latent structure analysis and test theory. In Gulliksen, H. and Messick, S. (Eds.), Psychological scaling: theory and applications. New York: Wiley, 1960, 83–96.Google Scholar
Loevinger, J. A systematic approach to the construction and evaluation of tests of ability. Psychol. Monogr., 1947, 61, 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M. A theory of test scores. Psychometric Monogr., 1952, No. 7.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. P. A note on the derivation of the general latent class model. Psychometrika, 1962, 27, 203–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, R. P. A general approach to nonlinear factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1962, 27, 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, E. A. A short method for calculating maximum battery reliability. Nature, 1947, 159, 816–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, C. R. Estimation and tests of significance in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1955, 20, 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasch, G. Studies in mathematical psychology. I. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests, Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Inst. Educ. Res., 1960.Google Scholar
Tucker, L. R. Maximum validity of a test with equivalent items. Psychometrika, 1946, 11, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vinsonhaler, J. F. Stochastic models for repeated presentations of mental test items, Berkeley: Univ. California, 1965.Google Scholar