Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T16:58:12.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Results on Proper Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors with Applications to Scaling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Roderick P. McDonald*
Affiliation:
The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
Yukihiko Torii
Affiliation:
Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services
Shizuhiko Nishisato
Affiliation:
The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
*
Requests for offprints should be sent to R. P. McDonald, Department of Measurement, Evaluation and Computer Applications, The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 252 Bloor St. W., Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1V6, Canada.

Abstract

Conditions are given under which the stationary points and values of a ratio of quadratic forms in two singular matrices can be obtained by a series of simple matrix operations. It is shown that two classes of optimal weighting problems, based respectively on the grouping of variables and on the grouping of observations, satisfy these conditions. The classical treatment of optimal scaling of forced-choice multicategory data is extended for these cases. It is shown that previously suggested methods based on reparameterization will work only under very special conditions.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Reference Notes

de Leeuw, J. HOMALS, 1976, New Jersey: Murray Hill.Google Scholar
Nishisato, S.Optimal scaling as applied to different forms of data. Department of Measurement and Evaluation, The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1976.Google Scholar
Nishisato, S.Analysis of categorical data: Dual scaling and its applications, manuscript in preparation, 1978.Google Scholar

References

Fisher, R. A. The precision of discriminant functions. Annals of Eugenics, 1940, 10, 422429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fix, G., & Heiberger, R. An algorithm for the ill-conditioned generalized eigenvalue problem. Siam Journal on Numerical Analysis, 1972, 9, 7889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graybill, F. A. Matrix algebra with statistical applications, 1969, Calif.: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. The quantification of a class of attributes: A theory and method of scale construction. In Horst, P.(Eds.), The prediction of personal adjustment. New York: Social Science Research Council. 1941, 319348.Google Scholar
Hayashi, C., Higuchi, I., & Komazawa, T.Joho shori to tokei suri [Information processing and statistical mathematics], Chapter 6 by Hayashi, C. Tokyo: Sangyo Tosho Press, 1970 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Healy, M. J. R., & Goldstein, H. An approach to the scaling of categorical attributes. Biometrika, 1976, 63, 219229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschfeld, H. O. A connection between correlation and contingency. Cambridge Philosophical Society Proceedings, 1935, 31, 520524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horst, P. Measuring complex attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 1935, 6, 367374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, L. The LZ-algorithm to solve the generalized eigenvalue problem. Siam Journal on Numerical Analysis, 1974, 11, 9971024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, R. P. A unified treatment of the weighting problem. Psychometrika, 1968, 33, 351381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moler, C. B., & Stewart, G. W. An algorithm for generalized matrix eigenvalue problems. Siam Journal on Numerical Analysis, 1973, 10, 241256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, G., & Wilkinson, J. H. Ax = λBx and the generalized eigenproblem. Siam Journal on Numerical Analysis, 1970, 7, 479492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rall, L. B. Newton's method for the characteristic value problem Ax = λBx. Journal of Social and Industrial Applied Mathematics, 1961, 9, 288293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, C. R., & Mitra, B. K. Generalized inverse of matrices and its application, 1971, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Richardson, M., & Kuder, G. F. Making a rating scale that measures. Personnel Journal, 1933, 12, 3640.Google Scholar
Ward, R. C. The combination shift QZ algorithm. Siam Journal on Numerical Analysis, 1975, 12, 835853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Loen, C. F. A general matrix eigenvalue algorithm. Siam Journal on Numerical Analysis, 1975, 12, 819934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar