Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-6bmsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T22:29:13.696Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structural Equation Models with Continuous and Polytomous Variables

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Sik-Yum Lee ,
Wai-Yin Poon  and
P. M. Bentler
Sik-Yum Lee*
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Wai-Yin Poon
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
P. M. Bentler
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
*
Request for reprints should be sent to Sik-Yum Lee, Department of Statistics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., HONG KONG.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A two-stage procedure is developed for analyzing structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables. At the first stage, the maximum likelihood estimates of the thresholds, polychoric covariances and variances, and polyserial covariances are simultaneously obtained with the help of an appropriate transformation that significantly simplifies the computation. An asymptotic covariance matrix of the estimates is also computed. At the second stage, the parameters in the structural covariance model are obtained via the generalized least squares approach. Basic statistical properties of the estimates are derived and some illustrative examples and a small simulation study are reported.

Keywords

structural equation modelspolychoric correlationspolyserial correlationsmaximum likelihoodgeneralized least squaresasymptotic properties
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 89 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported in part by a research grant DA01070 from the U. S. Public Health Service. We are indebted to several referees and the editor for very valuable comments and suggestions for improvement of this paper. The computing assistance of King-Hong Leung and Man-Lai Tang is also gratefully acknowledged.

References

Afifi, A. A., Azen, S. P. (1972). Statistical analysis: A computer oriented approach, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. C., Gerbing, (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, T. W. (1988). Multivariate linear relations. In Pukkila, T., Puntanen, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the second international Tampere conference in statistics (pp. 9–30). Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M. (1983). Some contributions to efficient statistics in structural models: Specification and estimation of moment structures. Psychometrika, 48, 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS: Structural equation program manual, Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M., Lee, S.-Y. (1978). Matrix derivatives with chain rule and rules for simple, Hadamard, and Kronecker products. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 17, 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, R. D., Lieberman, M. (1970). Fitting a response model for n dichotomously scored items. Psychometrika, 35, 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boomsma, A. (1985). Nonconvergence, improper solutions and starting values in LISREL maximum likelihood estimation. Psychometrika, 50, 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, M. W. (1974). Generalized least-square estimators in the analysis of covariance structures. South African Statistical Journal, 8, 1–24.Google Scholar
Browne, M. W. (1982). Covariance structures. In Hawkins, D. M. (Eds.), Topics in applied multivariate analysis (pp. 72–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browne, M. W. (1987). Robustness of statistical inference in factor analysis and related models. Biometrika, 74, 375–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoffersson, A. (1975). Factor analysis of dichotomized variables. Psychometrika, 40, 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbin, B. C., Lindsey, R. (1985). Concepts of physical fitness 5th ed.,, Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown.Google Scholar
Ferguson, T. S. (1958). A method of generating best asymptotically normal estimates with applications to the estimation of bacterial densities. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29, 1046–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, F. H., Chan, K. M. (1987). Synopsis of sports medicine and sports science, Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S. (1972). Distributions in statistics: Continuous multivariate distributions, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D. (1988). PRELIS: A preprocessor of LISREL, Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D. (1988). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and application, Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
Lee, S.-Y. (1981). The multiplier method in constrained estimation of covariance structure models. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 12, 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.-Y., Bentler, P. M. (1980). Some asymptotic properties of constrained generalized least squares estimation in covariance structure models. South African Statistical Journal, 14, 121–136.Google Scholar
Lee, S.-Y., Jennrich, R. I. (1979). A study of algorithms for covariance structure analysis with specific comparisons using factor analysis. Psychometrika, 44, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.-Y., Poon, W.-Y. (1986). Maximum likelihood estimation of polyserial correlations. Psychometrika, 51, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.-Y., Poon, W.-Y., Bentler, P. M. (1990). A three-stage estimation procedure for structural equation models with polytomous variables. Psychometrika, 55, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.-Y., Poon, W.-Y., Bentler, P. M. (1990). Full maximum likelihood analysis of structural equation models with polytomous variables. Statistics and Probability Letters, 9, 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, R. P., Swaminathan, H. (1973). A simple matrix calculus with application to multivariate analysis. General Systems, 18, 37–54.Google Scholar
Mislevy, R. J. (1986). Recent developments in factor analysis of categorical variables. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén, B. (1978). Contributions to factor analysis of dichotomous variables. Psychometrika, 43, 551–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén, B. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49, 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén, B. (1987). LISCOMP: Analysis of linear structural equations using a comprehensive measurement model, Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
Olsson, U., Drasgow, F., Dorans, N. J. (1982). The polyserial correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 47, 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poon, W.-Y., Lee, S.-Y. (1987). Maximum likelihood estimation of multivariate polyserial and polychoric correlation coefficients. Psychometrika, 52, 409–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satorra, A., Bentler, P. M. (1990). Model conditions for asymptotic robustness in analysis of linear relations. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10, 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schervish, M. J. (1984). Multivariate normal probabilities with error bound. Applied Statistics, 33, 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPSS, (1988). SPSS-X user's guide 3rd ed.,, Chicago, IL: Author.Google Scholar
Wilk, M. B., Gnanadesikan, R. (1968). Probability plotting methods for the analysis of data. Biometrika, 55, 1–17.Google ScholarPubMed