Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-2kk5n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T07:31:38.229Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subjective Geographic Distance: A Multidimensional Comparison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Ulf Lundberg  and
Gösta Ekman
Ulf Lundberg
Affiliation:
University of Stockholm
Gösta Ekman
Affiliation:
University of Stockholm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The interdistances between thirteen places situated in different parts of the world were estimated by 60 subjects. The estimates were analysed by Kruskal's multidimensional technique and, after a cosine transformation, by factor analysis. It was found that both methods yielded the same three-dimensional solution. Also a two-dimensional configuration could describe the data, and it was shown that this configuration contained representations of unidimensional ratings obtained in other studies.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , March 1973 , pp. 113 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This investigation was supported by grants from the Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Fund and the Swedish Council for Social Science Research.

†

Died 5 May 1971.

References

Attneave, F. Dimensions of similarity. American Journal of Psychology, 1950, 63, 516–556CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bratfisch, O. A further study of the relation between subjective distance and emotional involvement. Acta Psychologica, 1969, 29, 244–255CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bratfisch, O. and Lundberg, U. Subjective distance and emotional involvement: Experimental validation of the inverse square root law. Reports from the Psychological Laboratories, The University of Stockholm, 1971, No. 332.Google Scholar
Cliff, N. and Young, F. W. On the relation between unidimensional judgments and multidimensional scaling. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1968, 3, 269–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dornič, S. Subjective distance and emotional involvement: A verification of the exponent invariance. Reports from the Psychological Laboratories, The University of Stockholm, 1967, No. 237.Google Scholar
Ekman, G. A direct method for multidimensional ratio scaling. Psychometrika, 1963, 28, 33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, G. Two methods for the analysis of perceptual dimensionality. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1965, 20, 557–572CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, G. Comparative studies on multidimensional scaling and related techniques. Reports from the Psychological Laboratories, The University of Stockholm, 1970, Suppl. 3.Google Scholar
Ekman, G. and Bratfisch, O. Subjective distance and emotional involvement: A psychological mechanism. Acta Psychologica, 1965, 24, 446–453CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, G., Engen, T., Künnapas, T. and Lindman, R. A quantitative principle of qualitative similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964, 68, 530–536CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, G. and Sjöberg, L. Scaling. Annual Review of Psychology, 1965, 16, 451–474CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, P. E. and Carmone, F. J. Multidimensional scaling: An introduction and comparison of nonmetric unfolding techniques. Journal of Marketing Research, 1969, 6, 330–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 1968, 33, 469–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, H. H. Modern factor analysis, 1967, Chicago: Univ. Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, J. B. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 1964, 29, 1–27 (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, J. B. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling. A numerical method. Psychometrika, 1964, 29, 115–130 (b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, T. Multidimensional scaling of geometrical figures. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1970, 11, 246–254CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundberg, U., Bratfisch, O., and Ekman, G. Subjective distance and emotional involvement: A summary of investigations. Journal of Social Psychology, 1972, 87, 169–177CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGee, V. E. Multidimensional analysis of ‘elastic distances’. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1966, 19, 181–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGee, V. E. Multidimensional scaling of N sets of similarity measures: A nonmetric individual approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1968, 3, 233–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roskam, E., and Lingoes, J. MINISSA-1, a FORTRAN IV (G) program for smallest space analysis of square symmetric matrices. Behavioral Science, 1970, 15, 204–205Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I. Psychometrika, 1962, 27, 125–140 (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, R. N. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II. Psychometrika, 1962, 27, 219–246 (b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, R. N. and Carroll, J. D. Parametric representation of nonlinear data structures. In Krishnaiah, P. R. (Ed.), Multivariate analysis. International symposium (Dayton, Ohio, 1965). Proceedings. New York & London, 1966.Google Scholar
Torgerson, W. S. Theory and methods of scaling, 1958, New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Veldman, D. J. FORTRAN programming for the behavioral sciences, 1967, New York: HoltGoogle Scholar
Young, F. W., and Torgerson, W. S. TORSCA, a FORTRAN IV program for Shepard-Kruskal multidimensional scaling analysis. Behavioral Science, 1967, 12, 498–498Google Scholar