Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:09:23.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tables for the Determination of the Significance of Skewness and of the Significance of the Difference in the Skewness of Two Independent Distributions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Erwin K. Taylor*
Affiliation:
Personnel Research Section, Ago

Abstract

Several of the more popular statistics texts used in psychology are reviewed with respect to their treatment of the measurement and interpretation of skewness. Some areas in psychology where measures of skewness of distributions may yield significant information are indicated. Tables of 1%, 2% and 5% points of moment measures of skewness and tables of the 1% and 5% points of the difference in skewness of two uncorrelated distributions are presented. These tables are approximations based on the approximate normality of skewness in large samples from normal populations. The limited confidence with which these tables can be used in the absence of exact knowledge of the distribution function of the underlying statistics is indicated.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1947 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and are not to be interpreted as official War Department policy.

References

Allport, F. H. and Solomon, R. S. Lengths of conversation: a conformity situation analyzed by the telec continuum and J-curve hypotheses. J. abn. soc. Psychol., 1939, 34, 419419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, E. F. Jr.. Earnings of machine tenders and of bench workers. Personnel J., 1931, 10, 102102.Google Scholar
Cureton, E. E. and Dunlap, J. W. Note on testing of departure from normality. J. appl. Psych., 1930, 14, 9191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Allen L. Statistical analysis, New York: Rinehart & Co., 1946.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. Moments and product moments of sampling distributions. Proc. London Math. Soc., 1929, 30, 199199.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. Statistical methods for research workers 6th Ed.,, Edinburg: Oliver & Boyd, 1936.Google Scholar
Ford, A. A scientific approach to labor problems, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1931.Google Scholar
Garrett, Henry E. Statistics in psychology and education 2nd Ed.,, New York: Longmans Green & Co., 1938.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. Psychometric methods, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. Fundamental statistics in psychology and education, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1942.Google Scholar
Katzoff, E. T. The measurement of conformity. Psychometrika, 1942, 7, 3131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, E. F. Statistical analysis in educational research, New York: Houghton-Mifflin, 1940.Google Scholar
Lindquist, E. F. A first course in statistics, New York: Houghton-Mifflin, 1942.Google Scholar
Pearson, E. S. A further development of tests of normality. Biometrika, 1931, 22, 239239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepper, J. The sampling distribution of the third moment coefficient. Biometrika, 1932, 24, 5353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, C. C. and Van Voorhis, W. R. Statistical procedures and their mathematical bases, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. Statistical methods, Ames, Iowa: Collegiate Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Williams, P. Note on the sampling distribution of √β1 where the population is normal. Biometrica, 1935, 27, 269269.Google Scholar
Uhrbrock, R. S. Attitudes of 4430 employees. J. soc. Psychol., 1934, 5, 365365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoder, D. Personnel management and industrial relations, New York: Prentice Hall, 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar