Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T16:33:29.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Theory of Pattern Analysis for the Prediction of a Quantitative Criterion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Ardie Lubin  and
Hobart G. Osburn
Ardie Lubin
Affiliation:
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
Hobart G. Osburn
Affiliation:
Human Resources Research Office, George Washington University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A method of pattern analysis is presented for the case of dichotomous items and a quantitative criterion. This “configural scale” has maximum validity in the least squares sense. A technique for computing the configural scale as a polynomial function of the item scores is given. Tests of significance are outlined for such questions as: Is there a linear or non-linear relation between the quantitative criterion and the item scores? Does the addition of certain items to the test increase the validity of the configural scale? Are all the items in the configural scale fully effective?

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , March 1957 , pp. 63 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © 1957 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gaier, E. L. and Lee, Marilyn C. Pattern analysis. The configural approach to predictive measurement. Psychol. Bull., 1953, 50, 141–149CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guttman, L. In The prediction of personal adjustment. In Horst, P. (Eds.), Bulletin 48, New York: Social Science Research Council, 1941Google Scholar
Guttman, L. In Measurement and prediction, Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, F. A., Lazarsfeld, P. F. et al. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1950Google Scholar
Horst, P. Pattern analysis and configural scoring. J. clin. Psychol., 1954, 10, 3–113.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendall, M. G. The advanced theory of statistics. Vol. II, London: Griffin, 1946Google Scholar
Lord, F. M. Efficiency of prediction when a regression equation from one sample is used in a new sample. RB 50-40, Educational Testing Service, 1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, P. E. Configural scoring. J. consult. Psychol., 1950, 14, 165–171CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rao, C. R. Utilization of multiple measurements in problems of biological classification. J. roy. statist. Soc. B, 1948, 10, 159–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar