Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:33:20.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Kinds of Factor Analysis?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Raymond E. Hartley
Raymond E. Hartley*
Affiliation:
University of Miami
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In descriptive factor analysis, the factor matrix is merely an alternate mode of expression of the meaning expressed by the correlation matrix. In inferential factor analysis, the factor matrix expresses material inferred from the correlation matrix but not contained in the correlation matrix. A major problem has been whether or not the latter type is possible. Granit's color cone study is interpreted as a factor study in the hope of showing that inferential factor analysis actually exists. It is argued that proof of these and other points in factor theory can be accomplished only by logical analysis.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , September 1954 , pp. 195 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © 1954 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This article was read before the Florida Psychological Association, 1953. It is based upon a portion of a dissertation submitted by the writer to the department of psychology of the University of Chicago in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree.

References

Burt, C. The factors of the mind, New York: Macmillan Co., 1941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granit, R. A physiological theory of color perception. Nature, 1943, 151, 11–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granit, R. Isolation of the mammalian colour receptors with micro-electrodes. Nature, 1945, 155, 711–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granit, R. Sensory mechanisms of the retina, London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1947Google Scholar
Kelley, T. L. Comment on Wilson and Worcester's “Note on factor analysis.”. Psychometrika, 1940, 5, 117–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. Multiple-factor analysis. Univ. Chicago Press, 1947.Google Scholar