Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:04:19.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Use of Extreme Groups to Test for the Presence of a Relationship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Leonard S. Feldt*
Affiliation:
State University of Iowa

Abstract

Experimenters in psychology frequently investigate the relationship between two variables by selecting extreme groups on the first measure and comparing their mean scores on the second. This paper considers the efficacy of this procedure from the criterion of the power of the statistical tests. Optimal cutting points for the extreme groups are defined, and the power of the difference approach is compared to that of significance tests for the productmoment correlation coefficient.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1961 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartlett, M. S. Fitting a straight line when both variables are subject to error. Biometrics, 1949, 5, 207212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldt, L. S. A comparison of the precision of three experimental designs employing a concomitant variable. Psychometrika, 1958, 23, 335353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, W. M. and Jowett, G. H. “Three-group” regression analysis. I. Simple regression analysis. Appl. Statist., 1957, 6, 114122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, T. L. Fundamentals of statistics, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Kelley, T. L. The Kelley statistical tables, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1948.Google Scholar
Kelley, T. L. The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. J. educ. Psychol., 1939, 30, 1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, D. C. et al. The achievement motive, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNemar, Q. At random: Sense and nonsense. Amer. Psychologist, 1960, 15, 295300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, C. C. and Van Voorhis, W. R. Statistical procedures and their mathematical bases, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, E. S. and Hartley, H. O. Biometrika tables for statisticians, Vol. I., Cambridge, England: University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. A. Drive theory and manifest anxiety. Psychol. Bull., 1956, 53, 303320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed