Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T03:34:28.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attentional modification of short-lead prepulse inhibition and long-lead prepulse facilitation of acoustic startle among preadolescent boys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2002

LARRY W. HAWK ,
WILLIAM E. PELHAM  and
ANDREW R. YARTZ
LARRY W. HAWK
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA
WILLIAM E. PELHAM
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA
ANDREW R. YARTZ
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA
Get access

Abstract

In adults, short-lead prepulse inhibition and long-lead prepulse facilitation of startle are greater during attended than ignored prestimuli. To examine these phenomena in children, fourteen 9- to 12-year-old boys completed a tone discrimination task in two sessions separated by 1 week. During each tone series, participants attended to one pitch and ignored the other. Startle probes (102 dB) were presented 120, 240, 2,000 or 4,500 ms following the onset of two-thirds of tones, and during one-third of intertrial intervals. Eyeblink EMG startle was recorded. Percent prepulse inhibition at 120 ms was greater for attended than ignored stimuli in Session 1 but not Session 2. Long-lead prepulse facilitation was marginally greater for attended than ignored tones and did not vary across sessions. Test–retest reliability was moderate during attended prestimuli but was modest during ignored prestimuli. Reliability of attentional modification was poorest at 120 ms and strongest at 4,500 ms. Overall, this study extended prior work in adults and provided a basis for further study of controlled attentional modification of startle in children.

Keywords

AttentionStartle reflexPrepulse inhibitionChildrenDevelopmentTest–retest reliability
Type
Research Article
Information
Psychophysiology , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , May 2002 , pp. 333 - 339
Copyright
© 2002 Society for Psychophysiological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)