Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:48:39.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of background noise on P300 to suprathreshold stimuli

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2017

DEAN F. SALISBURY
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital Belmont, Massachusetts, USA Boston Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Brockton, Massachusetts, USA
MASSIMO A. DESANTIS
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital Belmont, Massachusetts, USA
MARTHA E. SHENTON
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital Belmont, Massachusetts, USA Boston Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Brockton, Massachusetts, USA
ROBERT W. MCCARLEY
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital Belmont, Massachusetts, USA Boston Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Brockton, Massachusetts, USA
Get access

Abstract

Both the amplitude and latency of P300 vary with changes in stimulus parameters. Stimuli at intensities or pitch separations near threshold evoke a smaller and later P300. P300 is also affected by extraneous stimulus parameters in tasks where stimulus frequency separation is large and stimuli are well above intensity thresholds. For example, the presence of background white noise when tones are suprathreshold and easily detectable has been reported to increase P300 latency. However, the effects of background masking noise on P300 amplitude and scalp topography have not been reported. Subjects performed an oddball task both in the presence and in the absence of background noise. Performance accuracy was unaffected by background noise. P300 showed latency increases when noise was present, but P300 peak amplitude was unaffected. P300 scalp topography was stable across both conditions. P300 latency is affected by background noise, even when performance is not, but amplitude and amplitude topography remain unaffected.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2002 Society for Psychophysiological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)