Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message

Login Alert

Cancel
Log in
×
×
Register
Log In
(0) Cart
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Cited by
  • Crossref logo 44
  • Google Scholar logo
Crossref Citations
Crossref logo
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Picton, Terence W van Roon, Patricia Armilio, Maria L Berg, Patrick Ille, Nicole and Scherg, Michael 2000. The correction of ocular artifacts: a topographic perspective. Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 111, Issue. 1, p. 53.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Friedman, David and Johnson, Ray 2000. Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: A selective review. Microscopy Research and Technique, Vol. 51, Issue. 1, p. 6.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Bruder, Gerard E Kayser, Jürgen Tenke, Craig E Friedman, Michelle Malaspina, Dolores and Gorman, Jack M 2001. Event-related potentials in schizophrenia during tonal and phonetic oddball tasks: relations to diagnostic subtype, symptom features and verbal memory. Biological Psychiatry, Vol. 50, Issue. 6, p. 447.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Friedman, David Cycowicz, Yael M. and Gaeta, Helen 2001. The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 25, Issue. 4, p. 355.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Miller, Antoinette R. Rosenfeld, J. Peter Soskins, Matthew and Jhee, Marianne 2002. P300 Amplitude and Topography in an Autobiographical Oddball Paradigm Involving Simulated Amnesia. Journal of Psychophysiology, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 1.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Jonkman, L. M. Lansbergen, M. and Stauder, J. E. A. 2003. Developmental differences in behavioral and event‐related brain responses associated with response preparation and inhibition in a go/nogo task. Psychophysiology, Vol. 40, Issue. 5, p. 752.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Friedman, David Cycowicz, Yael M and Dziobek, Isabel 2003. Cross-form conceptual relations between sounds and words: effects on the novelty P3. Cognitive Brain Research, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 58.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Simon-Thomas, Emiliana R Brodsky, Kim Willing, Cammy Sinha, Rashmi and Knight, Robert T 2003. Distributed neural activity during object, spatial and integrated processing in humans. Cognitive Brain Research, Vol. 16, Issue. 3, p. 457.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Gehring, William J. Bryck, Richard L. Jonides, John Albin, Roger L. and Badre, David 2003. The mind's eye, looking inward? In search of executive control in internal attention shifting. Psychophysiology, Vol. 40, Issue. 4, p. 572.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, J. Peter Rao, Archana Soskins, Matthew and Miller, Antoinette Reinhart 2003. Scaled P300 Scalp Distribution Correlates of Verbal Deception in an Autobiographical Oddball Paradigm: Control for Task Demand. Journal of Psychophysiology, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 14.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Cycowicz, Yael M. and Friedman, David 2003. Source memory for the color of pictures: Event‐related brain potentials (ERPs) reveal sensory‐specific retrieval‐related activity. Psychophysiology, Vol. 40, Issue. 3, p. 455.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Gaeta, Helen Friedman, David and Hunt, Gregory 2003. Stimulus characteristics and task category dissociate the anterior and posterior aspects of the novelty P3. Psychophysiology, Vol. 40, Issue. 2, p. 198.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Pernet, Cyril Basan, Sebastien Doyon, Bernard Cardebat, Dominique Démonet, Jean-François and Celsis, Pierre 2003. Neural timing of visual implicit categorization. Cognitive Brain Research, Vol. 17, Issue. 2, p. 327.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Lueschow, Andreas Sander, Tilmann Boehm, Stephan G. Nolte, Guido Trahms, Lutz and Curio, Gabriel 2004. Looking for faces: Attention modulates early occipitotemporal object processing. Psychophysiology, Vol. 41, Issue. 3, p. 350.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Mcneely, Heather E. Dywan, Jane and Segalowitz, Sidney J. 2004. ERP indices of emotionality and semantic cohesiveness during recognition judgments. Psychophysiology, Vol. 41, Issue. 1, p. 117.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Cycowicz, Yael M and Friedman, David 2004. The old switcheroo: when target environmental sounds elicit a novelty P3. Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 115, Issue. 6, p. 1359.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Johnson, Ray Barnhardt, Jack and Zhu, John 2004. The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 42, Issue. 7, p. 878.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Duarte, Audrey Ranganath, Charan Winward, Laurel Hayward, Dustin and Knight, Robert T 2004. Dissociable neural correlates for familiarity and recollection during the encoding and retrieval of pictures. Cognitive Brain Research, Vol. 18, Issue. 3, p. 255.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Simon-Thomas, Emiliana R. and Knight, Robert T. 2005. Affective and cognitive modulation of performance monitoring: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 5, Issue. 3, p. 362.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
NITTONO, Hiroshi 2005. MISSING-STIMULUS POTENTIALS ASSOCIATED WITH A DISRUPTION OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION. PSYCHOLOGIA, Vol. 48, Issue. 2, p. 93.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Download full list
Google Scholar Citations

View all Google Scholar citations for this article.

×
Cambridge University Press

Our Site

  • Accessibility
  • Contact & Help
  • Legal Notices

Our Platforms

  • Cambridge Core
  • Cambridge Open Engage
  • Cambridge Higher Education

Our Products

  • Journals
  • Books
  • Elements
  • Textbooks
  • Courseware

Join us online

Please choose a valid location.

  • Rights & Permissions
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies Policy
Cambridge University Press 2024

Cancel
Confirm
×

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Scaling is necessary when making comparisons between shapes of event-related potential topographies: A reply to Haig et al.
  • Volume 36, Issue 6
  • DANIEL S. RUCHKIN (a1), RAY JOHNSON (a2) and DAVID FRIEDMAN (a3)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3660832
Please provide your Kindle email.
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Scaling is necessary when making comparisons between shapes of event-related potential topographies: A reply to Haig et al.
  • Volume 36, Issue 6
  • DANIEL S. RUCHKIN (a1), RAY JOHNSON (a2) and DAVID FRIEDMAN (a3)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3660832
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Scaling is necessary when making comparisons between shapes of event-related potential topographies: A reply to Haig et al.
  • Volume 36, Issue 6
  • DANIEL S. RUCHKIN (a1), RAY JOHNSON (a2) and DAVID FRIEDMAN (a3)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3660832
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Contents help
Close Contents help

- No HTML tags allowed
- Web page URLs will display as text only
- Lines and paragraphs break automatically
- Attachments, images or tables are not permitted

Please enter your response.

Your details

Email help
Close Email help

Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.

Please enter a valid email address.
You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help

Close Conflicting interests help

Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.