Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:41:49.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Slow event-related brain activity of aphasic patients and controls in word comprehension and rhyming tasks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2003

CHRISTIAN DOBEL
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
RUDOLF COHEN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
PATRICK BERG
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
WILLI NAGL
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
ELVIRA ZOBEL
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
PETER KÖBBEL
Affiliation:
Lurija-Institute for Rehabilitation and Health Research, Schmieder Rehabilitation Hospital, Allensbach, Germany
PAUL-WALTER SCHÖNLE
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany Lurija-Institute for Rehabilitation and Health Research, Schmieder Rehabilitation Hospital, Allensbach, Germany
BRIGITTE ROCKSTROH
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany Lurija-Institute for Rehabilitation and Health Research, Schmieder Rehabilitation Hospital, Allensbach, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Slow event-related potentials (ERP) were examined in healthy and aphasic subjects in two-stimulus designs comprising a word comprehension and a rhyming task. Aphasics, though selected to perform above chance level, made significantly more errors and responded more slowly than controls, although canonical correlations did not indicate a statistical relationship between performance measures and ERP amplitudes. A discriminant analysis of ERP amplitudes distinguished the groups for the slow wave (SW; 0.5–1.0 s post-S1 onset) in the word comprehension, for the SW and the initial contingent negative variation (iCNV; 1.0–2.0 s post-S1 onset) in the rhyming task. Similarly for both tasks, ERP topography showed left-anterior predominance of the negative SW and iCNV in controls, whereas participants with aphasia showed smaller anterior and larger left-posterior amplitudes. The centroparietal terminal CNV (tCNV; 1 s pre-S2) was smaller in participants with aphasia than in controls, but similar in topography. Results suggest left-anterior activation for those language processes that were presumably provoked in the present tasks, like lexical access, or phonological encoding. The pattern of participants with aphasia may indicate effects of language impairment and recovery, but also consequences of the brain damage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2002 Society for Psychophysiological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)