Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:16:59.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stimulus modality and Go/NoGo effects on P3 during parallel visual and auditory continuous performance tasks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2001

AYDA TEKOK-KILIC
Affiliation:
Division of Developmental and Behavioral Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA Behavioral Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA
JANET L. SHUCARD
Affiliation:
Division of Developmental and Behavioral Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA
DAVID W. SHUCARD
Affiliation:
Division of Developmental and Behavioral Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA Behavioral Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA
Get access

Abstract

Task and modality effects on P3 latency, amplitude, and scalp topography were studied during parallel versions of visual (VCPT) and auditory (ACPT) continuous performance tasks using a Go/NoGo paradigm (A-X CPT). Both the ACPT and VCPT incorporated five conditions including Go and NoGo stimulus sequences as well as three other nontarget conditions. The goal was to evaluate the functional significance and modality specificity of the P300 response and the NoGo P3. Analyses were performed using both raw and normalized data to make comparisons across modalities. For both modalities, the Target X (Go) and three nontarget conditions elicited maximum P3 amplitudes over the posterior scalp sites and qualified as classical P300 responses. The NoGo condition was associated with an increase in central-frontal amplitude compared to the Target X condition. The scalp topography of the P300/P3 for Go and NoGo conditions, as well as all other conditions, was the same for both modalities, supporting the modality independent nature of both P300 and the NoGo P3. Min-Max normalization of P3 amplitudes did not change the condition-topography relationships.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2001 Society for Psychophysiological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)