Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:50:25.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Workday communication and ambulatory blood pressure: Implications for the reactivity hypothesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1999

ELIZABETH BRONDOLO
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, St. John's University, Jamaica, NY, USA
WILLIAM KARLIN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, St. John's University, Jamaica, NY, USA
KWAME ALEXANDER
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, St. John's University, Jamaica, NY, USA
AMY BOBROW
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, St. John's University, Jamaica, NY, USA
JOSEPH SCHWARTZ
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, State University of New York, Stonybrook, USA
Get access

Abstract

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was used to investigate the cardiovascular correlates of naturally occurring interpersonal interactions. Participants were New York City traffic agents, who routinely engage in conflict-prone communication with the public under relatively fixed conditions. Talking with the public, supervisors, or coworkers was associated with levels of systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate that exceeded a resting baseline. Blood pressure was higher when agents were talking to the public than when they were talking to coworkers or engaged in a noncommunicative work task. Systolic blood pressure response during communication was associated with the agent's mood. Blood pressure effects associated with communication appear to persist after the communication has ceased. Implications of these data for the reactivity hypothesis of the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
1999 Society for Psychophysiological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)