Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:25:34.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of patterns of food intake in nutritional epidemiology: food classification in principal components analysis and the subsequent impact on estimates for endometrial cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Susan E McCann*
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, 270 Farber Hall, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA
James R Marshall
Affiliation:
Arizona Cancer Center, 1515 N. Campbell Avenue, PO Box 245024, Tucson, AZ 85724-5024, USA
John R Brasure
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, 270 Farber Hall, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA
Saxon Graham
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, 270 Farber Hall, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA
Jo L Freudenheim
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, 270 Farber Hall, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Email mccann@acsu.buffalo.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To assess the effect of different methods of classifying food use on principal components analysis (PCA)-derived dietary patterns, and the subsequent impact on estimation of cancer risk associated with the different patterns.

Methods:

Dietary data were obtained from 232 endometrial cancer cases and 639 controls (Western New York Diet Study) using a 190-item semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire. Dietary patterns were generated using PCA and three methods of classifying food use: 168 single foods and beverages; 56 detailed food groups, foods and beverages; and 36 less-detailed groups and single food items.

Results:

Classification method affected neither the number nor character of the patterns identified. However, total variance explained in food use increased as the detail included in the PCA decreased (~8%, 168 items to ~17%, 36 items). Conversely, reduced detail in PCA tended to attenuate the odds ratio (OR) associated with the healthy patterns (OR 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35–0.84 and OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.49–1.20, 168 and 36 items, respectively) but not the high-fat patterns (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.57–1.58 and OR 0.85, 0.51–1.40, 168 and 36 items, respectively).

Conclusions:

Greater detail in food-use information may be desirable in determination of dietary patterns for more precise estimates of disease risk.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 2001

References

1Randall, E, Marshall, JR, Graham, S, Brasure, J. Frequency of food use data and the multidimensionality of diet. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1989; 89: 1070–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Randall, E, Marshall, JR, Graham, S, Brasure, J. High risk health behaviors associated with various dietary patterns. Nutr. Cancer. 1991; 16: 135–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Ursin, G, Ziegler, RG, Subar, AF, Graubard, BI, Haile, RW, Hoover, R. Dietary patterns associated with a low-fat diet in the national health examination follow-up study: identification of potential confounders for epidemiologic analyses. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1993; 137(8): 916–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Randall, E, Marshall, JR, Graham, S, Brasure, J. Patterns in food use and their associations with nutrient intakes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1990; 52: 739–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Randall, E, Marshall, JR, Brasure, J, Graham, S. Patterns in food use and compliance with NCI dietary guidelines. Nutr. Cancer. 1991; 15: 141–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Hu, FB, Rimm, E, Smith-Warner, SA, Feskanich, D, Stampfer, MJ, Ascherio, A, Sampson, L, Willett, WC. Reproducibility and validity of dietary patterns assessed with a food-frequency questionnaire. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999; 69: 243–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Randall, E, Marshall, JR, Brasure, J, Graham, S. Dietary patterns and colon cancer in western New York. Nutr. Cancer. 1992; 18: 265–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Slattery, ML, Boucher, KM, Caan, BJ, Potter, JD, Ma, KN. Eating patterns and risk of colon cancer. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1998; 148(1): 416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Hu, FB, Rimm, EB, Stampfer, MJ, Ascherio, A, Spiegelman, D, Willett, WC. A prospective study of major dietary patterns and risk of coronary heart disease in men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000; 72(4): 912–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Johnson, DE. Principal components analysis. Applied Multivariate Methods for Data Analysts. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxberry Press, 1998; chapter 5.Google Scholar
11Martinez, ME, Marshall, JR, Sechrest, L. Invited commentary: factor analysis and the search for objectivity. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1998; 148(1): 17–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Slattery, ML, Boucher, KM. The senior authors' response: factor analysis as a tool for evaluating eating patterns. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1998; 148(1): 20–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13McCann, SE, Freudenheim, JL, Marshall, JR, Vena, JE, Laughlin, R, Brasure, JR, Swanson, MK, Graham, S. Diet in the epidemiology of endometrial cancer in Western New York. Cancer Causes Control. 2000; 11(10): 965–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14US Department of Agriculture. Composition of Foods. Agriculture Handbook 8, revisions 8.1–8.17, 8.21. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 19761989.Google Scholar
15US Department of Agriculture. Nutritive Value of American Foods in Common Units. Agriculture Handbook 456. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1975.Google Scholar
16Mangels, AR, Holden, JM, Beecher, GR, Forman, MR, Lanza, E. Carotenoid content of fruits and vegetables: an evaluation of analytic data [published erratum appears in. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1993; 93: 527]. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1993; 93: 284–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Chug-Ahuja, JK, Holden, JM, Forman, MR, Mangels, AR, Beecher, GR, Lanza, E. The development and application of a carotenoid database for fruits, vegetables, and selected multicomponent foods. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1993; 93: 318–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed