Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:49:09.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Correlates of fruit and vegetable intake among Norwegian schoolchildren: parental and self-reports

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Elling Bere  and
Knut-Inge Klepp
Elling Bere*
Affiliation:
Institute for Nutrition Research, University of Oslo, Box 1046 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway
Knut-Inge Klepp
Affiliation:
Institute for Nutrition Research, University of Oslo, Box 1046 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway
*
*Corresponding author: Email elling.bere@basalmed.uio.no
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives:

To identify correlates of 6th and 7th graders' (age 10–12 years) fruit and vegetable intake, to investigate parent–child correlations of fruit and vegetable intake, and to compare parents' and children's reports of children's accessibility, skills and preferences with respect to fruit and vegetables.

Design:

The results presented are based on the baseline survey of the ‘Fruits and Vegetables Make the Marks Project’, where 38 schools participated.

Setting:

Fruit and vegetable intake was measured by food frequency questions. Theoretical factors, based on Social Cognitive Theory, potentially correlated to intake were measured, including behavioural skills, accessibility, modelling, intention, preferences, self-efficacy and awareness of 5-a-day recommendations.

Subjects:

In total, 1950 (participation rate 85%) 6th and 7th graders and 1647 of their parents participated.

Results:

Overall, 34% of the variance in the pupils' reported fruit and vegetable intake was explained by the measured factors. The strongest correlates to fruit and vegetable intake were preferences and accessibility. The correlation between the children's and their parents' fruit and vegetable intake was 0.23. The parents perceived their children's accessibility to be better than what was reported by the children (P<0.01), while the children reported their skills to be better than what was perceived by their parents (P<0.01).

Conclusion:

The results from this study clearly point to a need for nutrition interventions aimed at parents. An important next step will be to investigate whether the identified correlates predict future fruit and vegetable intake, and whether they mediate any changes in intake in an intervention study.

Keywords

FruitVegetablesCorrelatesSchoolchildrenNorway
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 7 , Issue 8 , December 2004 , pp. 991 - 998
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2004

References

1World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF)/American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR). Food, Nutrition and the Prevention of Cancer. Washington, DC: WCRF/AICR, 1997.Google Scholar
2National Nutrition Council. Recommendations for Increased Intake of Fruits and Vegetables. Oslo: National Nutrition Council, 1996 [in Norwegian].Google Scholar
3Johansson, L, Andersen, LF. Who eats 5 a day? Intake of fruits and vegetables among Norwegians in relation to gender and lifestyle. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1998; 98: 689–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Øverby, NC, Andersen, LF. Ungkost-2000: Nationwide Dietary Survey among 4th and 8th graders in Norway. Oslo: National Nutrition Council, 2002 [in Norwegian].Google Scholar
5Baranowski, T, Lin, LS, Wetter, DW, Resnicow, K, Hearn, MD. Theory as mediating variables: why aren't community interventions working as desired?. Annals of Epidemiology 1997; (Suppl.7): 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Reynolds, KD, Hinton, AW, Shewchuk, RM, Hickey, CA. Social cognitive model of fruit and vegetable consumption in elementary school children. Journal of Nutrition Education 1999; 31: 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Osler, M, Hansen, ET. Dietary knowledge and behaviour among schoolchildren in Copenhagen, Denmark. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine 1993; 21: 135–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Domel, SB, Baranowski, T, Davis, HC, Thompson, WO, Leonard, SB, Baranowski, J. A measure of outcome expectations for fruit and vegetable consumption among 4th and 5th grade children – reliability and validity. Health Education Research 1995; 10: 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Baranowski, T, Cullen, KW, Baranowski, J. Psychosocial correlates of dietary intake: advancing dietary intervention. Annual Review of Nutrition 1999; 19: 17–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Resnicow, K, Hearn, MD, Smith, M, Baranowski, T, Lin, LS, Baranowski, J. Social–cognitive predictors of fruit and vegetable intake in children. Health Psychology 1997; 16: 272–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Birch, LL, Fisher, JO. Development of eating behaviours among children and adolescents. Pediatrics 1998; 101: 539–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Domel, SB, Thompson, WO, Davis, HC, Baranowski, T, Leonard, SB, Baranowski, J. Psychosocial predictors of fruit and vegetable consumption among elementary school children. Health Education Research 1996; 11: 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Domel, SB, Baranowski, T, Davis, H, Leonard, SB, Riley, P, Baranowski, J. Measuring fruit and vegetable preferences among 4th- and 5th-grade students. Preventive Medicine 1993; 22: 866–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Woodward, DR, Boon, JA, Cumming, FJ, Ball, PJ, Williams, HM, Hornsby, H. Adolescents' reported usage of selected foods in relation to their perceptions and social norms for those foods. Appetite 1996; 27: 109–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Heatey, KR, Thombs, DL. Fruit–vegetable consumption self-efficacy in youth. American Journal of Health Behavior 1997; 21: 172–7.Google Scholar
16Lien, N, Lytle, LA, Komro, KA. Applying theory of planned behaviour to fruit and vegetable consumption of young adolescents. American Journal of Health Promotion 2002; 16: 189–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Cullen, KW, Baranowski, T, Rittenberry, L, Cosart, C, Hebert, D, deMoor, C. Child-reported family and peer influences on fruit, juice and vegetable consumption: reliability and validity of measures. Health Education Research 2001; 16: 187–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Gibson, EL, Wardle, J, Watts, CJ. Fruit and vegetable consumption, nutritional knowledge and beliefs in mothers and children. Appetite 1998; 31: 205–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19French, SA, Story, M, Jeffery, RW. Environmental influences on eating and physical activity. Annual Review of Public Health 2001; 22: 309–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Hearn, MD, Baranowski, T, Baranowski, J, Doyle, C, Smith, M, Lin, LS. Environmental influences on dietary behaviour among children: availability and accessibility of fruits and vegetables enable consumption. Journal of Health Education 1998; 29: 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Kratt, P, Reynolds, K, Shewchuk, R. The role of availability as a moderator of family fruit and vegetable consumption. Health Education & Behavior 2000; 27: 471–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Story, M, Neumark-Sztainer, D, French, S. Individual and environmental influences on adolescent eating behaviours. Journal of the American Dietetic Associatio 2002; (Suppl. 102): 40–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Roos, EB, Hirvonen, T, Mikkila, V, Karvonen, S, Rimpela, M. Household educational level as a determinant of consumption of raw vegetables among male and female adolescents. Preventive Medicine 2001; 33: 282–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Lien, N, Jacobs, DR, Klepp, K-I. Exploring predictors of eating behaviour among adolescents by gender and socio-economic status. Public Health Nutrition 2002; 5: 671–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Baranowski, T, Perry, CL, Parcel, GS. How individuals, environments, and health behaviour interacts. In: Glanz, K, Lewis, FM, Rimer, BK, eds. Health Behaviour and Health Education: Theory Research, and Practice. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1997; 153–78.Google Scholar
26Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.Google Scholar
27Wardle, J. Parental influences on children's diet. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 1995; 54: 747–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Bere, E, Klepp, K-I. Reliability of parental and self-reported determinants of fruit and vegetable intake among 6th graders. Public Health Nutrition 2004; 7: 353–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Andersen, LF, Bere, E, Kolbjørnsen, N, Klepp, K-I. Validity and reproducibility of self-reported intake of fruit and vegetables among 6th graders. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2004; 58: 771–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Hankins, M, French, D, Horne, R. Statistical guidelines for studies of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behaviour. Psychology & Health 2000; 15: 151–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Tabachnick, BG, Fidell, LS. Multiple regression. In: Tabachnick, BG, Fiedell, LS, eds. Using Multivariate Statistics, 4th ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2001; 111–76.Google Scholar
32Reynolds, KD, Yaroch, AL, Franklin, FA, Maloy, J. Testing mediating variables in a school-based nutrition intervention program. Health Psychology 2002; 21: 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar