Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:36:49.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is ‘five-a-day’ an effective way of increasing fruit and vegetable intakes?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

PAL Ashfield-Watt ,
AA Welch ,
NE Day  and
SA Bingham
PAL Ashfield-Watt
Affiliation:
EPIC, University of Cambridge, Institute of Public Health and Strangeways Research Laboratories, Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
AA Welch
Affiliation:
EPIC, University of Cambridge, Institute of Public Health and Strangeways Research Laboratories, Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
NE Day
Affiliation:
EPIC, University of Cambridge, Institute of Public Health and Strangeways Research Laboratories, Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
SA Bingham*
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council, Dunn Nutrition Unit, Wellcome Trust MRC Building, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2XY, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Email sab@mrc-dunn.cam.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives:

To assess whether the amount of fruits and vegetables consumed depends on the serving size or on how often fruits and vegetables are eaten.

Design:

Estimation of the weight of serving sizes and the number of fruits and vegetables eaten daily, using a validated food diary method.

Setting:

Free-living men and women participating in the Norfolk arm of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).

Subjects:

Two hundred and sixty-nine men and women sampled from EPIC–Norfolk to participate in a study of simple methods of assessing fruit and vegetable intakes.

Results:

The average portion of all fruits and vegetables measured was 87 g, close to the standard portion size of 80 g used as the basis of ‘5-a-day’ recommendations. There was a wide variation; the average portion size for baked beans was 147 g while for lettuce it was 26 g. The 20th and 80th percentiles also showed a large range, e.g. 39–72 g for carrots and 60–150 g for strawberries. Women ate more fruit than did men but fewer vegetables, so the total amount of fruit and vegetables eaten by men and women was the same. High consumers of fruits and vegetables (≥400 g day-1) ate them ~5 times a day whilst low consumers (<400 g day-1) ate them less often (~3 servings per day, P<0.01). Portion size differed little between high and low consumers.

Conclusions:

Frequency of intake is more important than portion size when distinguishing between high and low consumption of fruits and vegetables. Therefore, to increase intakes, low consumers should eat fruits and vegetables more often. This endorses the ‘5-a-day’ healthy eating message.

Keywords

5-a-dayFruits and vegetablesIntake frequencyPortion size
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 257 - 261
Copyright
Copyright © CAB International 2004

References

1Great Britain National Food Survey Committee. National Food Survey: 2000. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. London: The Stationery Office, 2001.Google Scholar
2Agudo, A, Amiano, P, Barcos, A, Barricarte, A, Beguiristain, JM, Chirlaque, MD, et al. Dietary intake of vegetables and fruits among adults in five regions of Spain. EPIC Group of Spain. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1999; 53: 174–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Naska, A, Vasdekis, VG, Trichopoulou, A, Friel, S, Leonhauser, IU, Moreiras, O, et al. Fruit and vegetable availability among ten European countries: how does it compare with the ‘five-a-day’ recommendation? DAFNE I and II projects of the European Commission. British Journal of Nutrition 2000; 84: 549–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4World Health Organization (WHO). Diet, Nutrition and The Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Technical Report Series No. 797. Geneva: WHO, 1990.Google Scholar
5Bingham, SA, Welch, AA, McTaggart, A, Mulligan, AA, Runswick, SA, Luben, R, et al. Nutritional methods in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer in Norfolk. Public Health Nutrition 2001; 4(3): 847–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Welch, AA, McTaggart, A, Mulligan, AA, Luben, R, Walker, N, Khaw, KT, et al. DINER (Data Into Nutrients for Epidemiological Research) – a new data-entry program for nutritional analysis in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort and the 7-day diary method. Public Health Nutrition 2001; 4(6): 1253–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Crawley, H. Food Portion Sizes, 2nd ed. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. London: HMSO, 1993.Google Scholar
8Williams, C. Healthy eating: clarifying advice about fruit and vegetables. British Medical Journal 1995; 310: 1453–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. The Dietary and Nutritional Survey of British Adults – Further Analysis. London: HMSO, 1994.Google Scholar