Several organizations currently recommend that adults sleep for at least 7 h per night, including the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and Sleep Research Society, the National Sleep Foundation and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention( Reference Watson and Badr 1 – 3 ). Failing to meet this recommendation has been associated with poor physical health( Reference Cappuccio, Cooper and D’Elia 4 ), mental health( Reference Zhai, Zhang and Zhang 5 ) and quality of life( Reference Bayan-Bravo, Perez-Tasigchana and Sayon-Orea 6 – Reference Chen, Gelaye and Williams 8 ). National survey data indicate that young adults aged 25–34 years are particularly likely to get insufficient sleep; in 2014, 28 % reported sleeping fewer than 7 h per night( Reference Liu, Wheaton and Chapman 9 ). Although short sleep duration and its relationship to dietary intake has been examined in adolescents( Reference Weiss, Xu and Storfer-Isser 10 , Reference Bel, Michels and De Vriendt 11 ), there is scant research on this relationship in young adults, who are undergoing major life transitions and engaging in independent decision making for the first time.
Most research among adults has involved short-term experiments conducted in sleep labs( Reference Capers, Fobian and Kaiser 12 ), which do not provide information on habitual behaviours among free-living adults. The few observational studies of adults have examined how sleep duration may be related to obesity( Reference Patel and Hu 13 , Reference Magee and Hale 14 ) and energy intake, with inconsistent results, but the specific aspects and patterns of dietary intake correlated with short sleep duration have scarcely been explored( Reference Kant and Graubard 15 – Reference Quick, Byrd-Bredbenner and Shoff 17 ). Even less is known about the association of sleep quality, variability and timing with dietary factors( Reference Baron, Reid and Kern 18 ). Furthermore, most prior studies were conducted in predominantly white populations, despite previous research exposing racial/ethnic( Reference Hale and Do 19 – Reference Stamatakis, Kaplan and Roberts 21 ) and socio-economic differences in sleep duration( Reference Grandner, Petrov and Rattanaumpawan 22 , Reference Grandner, Patel and Gehrman 23 ). A recent American Heart Association scientific statement named the inclusion of more diverse populations a top sleep research priority( Reference St-Onge, Grandner and Brown 24 ).
The Project EAT (Eating and Activity in Teens and Young Adults) study provides an opportunity to investigate the potentially bidirectional relationship between several sleep indices and dietary factors in a racially, ethnically and socio-economically diverse population of young adults. A previous analysis of Project EAT data, which used data from the same ‘wave’ presented herein, found that short sleep duration was associated with higher BMI in men but not women( Reference Meyer, Wall and Larson 25 ). We hypothesized that young adults who reported inadequate v. recommended amounts of sleep would consume more caffeinated and sugar-sweetened beverages and report more frequent breakfast skipping and eating at fast-food restaurants.
Methods
Project EAT was designed to study dietary intake, physical activity and weight among young people. Baseline data were collected in 1998–1999, when 4746 middle- and high-school students aged 11–18 years from thirty-one socio-economically and racially/ethnically diverse schools in the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area of Minnesota (USA) completed questionnaires and anthropometric measures( Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Story and Hannan 26 ). A 10-year follow-up survey (EAT-III) was completed in 2008–2009 by mailing all original participants an invitation to complete questionnaires on paper or online. A total of 2287 young adults completed this third wave of data collection, representing 66·4 % of those who could be contacted( Reference Larson, Neumark-Sztainer and Harwood 27 ). At the time of EAT-III, participants were 20–30 years old. For the present analysis, we limited the sample to participants whose third-wave survey data included plausible reports of dietary intake and sleep (n 1854). The University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board approved all study protocols and participants provided informed consent.
The original Project EAT survey was modified for EAT-III to improve the relevance of items for young adults and to investigate new research areas. Focus groups tested an initial draft and feedback was used to alter problematic survey measures and to expand on areas of importance. A revised survey was tested in a different sample to examine test–retest reliability over 1 to 3 weeks. Additional details of the survey development process have been described elsewhere( Reference Larson, Neumark-Sztainer and Story 28 ).
Sleep variables
Participants were asked about their usual bedtime and wake time on both weekdays and weekends, which were used to calculate average weekday and weekend ‘time in bed’( Reference Meyer, Wall and Larson 25 ). These items were drawn from a questionnaire previously used in studies of adolescent sleep( Reference Pasch, Laska and Lytle 29 , Reference Lytle, Pasch and Farbakhsh 30 ), and similar questions have been significantly correlated with both sleep diaries and actigraphy( Reference Wolfson, Carskadon and Acebo 31 ). Average daily time in bed was calculated using the following formula: (weekday time in bed × 5/7) + (weekend time in bed × 2/7). The calculation of hours of sleep per day assumed that wake time occurred after bed time. To correct problems with am/pm, sleep times longer than 16 h were adjusted by subtracting by 12 to obtain the value if the correct am/pm designation had been selected. Times in bed less than 4 h were set to missing. Time in bed was modelled categorically (<7 h, 7–<8 h, 8–<9 h and ≥9 h per night).
We also examined ‘sleep variability’ by calculating the absolute value of the difference between weekday and weekend time in bed, which was modelled in quartiles (<0·5 h, 0·5–<1 h, 1–1·5 h, >1·5 h). ‘Sleep timing’ was measured by averaging weekend and weekday bedtimes and modelling them in four categories (before 22.30 hours, 22.30–23.30 hours, 23.30–00.30 hours and after 00.30 hours). ‘Sleep quality’ was measured using the following question on the Kandel and Davies depressive symptoms questionnaire( Reference Kandel and Davies 32 ): ‘During the past 12 months, how often have been bothered or troubled by having trouble going to sleep or staying asleep?’ (test–retest r=0·64). Possible responses to this question included ‘not at all’, ‘sometimes’ and ‘very much’.
Dietary variables
Questions on frequency of skipping breakfast and eating at a fast-food restaurant were assessed on the Project EAT-III survey. Breakfast was assessed with the following question: ‘During the past week, how many days did you eat breakfast?’ with five possible responses ranging from ‘never’ to ‘every day’ (test–retest r=0·82). Fast food was assessed with the following question: ‘In the past week, how often did you eat something from a fast food restaurant (like McDonald’s, Burger King, Hardee’s etc.)?’ (test–retest r=0·48). Six possible responses were given, ranging from ‘never’ to ‘more than 7 times’. Both variables were treated as continuous.
Questions on energy and sports drink consumption were also assessed on the Project EAT-III survey. Energy drink consumption was assessed with the following question: ‘In the past year, how many times did you usually drink an energy drink (such as Red Bull, Full Throttle, Rockstar, etc.)?’ Sports drink consumption was assessed with the following question: ‘In the past year how many times did you usually drink a sports drink (such as Gatorade, PowerAde, etc.)?’ Seven possible responses were given, ranging from ‘less than once per month’ to ‘2 or more per day’. Based on the distribution of the variables( Reference Larson, Laska and Story 33 ), energy and sports drinks were dichotomized into two categories: at least one drink per week and less than one drink per week (test–retest agreement=94 % for sports drinks, 97 % for energy drinks).
Information on beverages including sugar-sweetened beverages, sugar-free beverages and caffeinated beverages was taken from a semi-quantitative FFQ that was administered at the same time as the Project EAT-III survey. This FFQ measured multivitamins, dietary supplements and intakes of 151 foods. The reproducibility and validity compared with diet records for measuring beverages have been assessed, and moderate to high correlations have been found (mean r for reproducibility=0·59, mean r for validity=0·63)( Reference Feskanich, Rimm and Giovannucci 34 ). Sugar-sweetened, sugar-free and caffeinated beverages were assessed with nine response categories, ranging from ‘never or less than once a month’ to ‘6+ per day’. This was translated into daily servings with a single serving defined as one glass, bottle or can. The sugar-sweetened beverages variable was created by summing the responses to questions on carbonated beverages with caffeine and sugar (e.g. Coke, Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Dr. Pepper), other carbonated beverages with sugar (e.g. 7-Up, Root Beer, Ginger Ale, Caffeine-Free Coke) and other sugared beverages (punch, lemonade, sports drinks or sugared ice tea). The sugar-free beverages variable was created by summing responses to questions on low-calorie beverages with caffeine (e.g. Diet Coke, Diet Mountain Dew) and other low-calorie beverages without caffeine (e.g. Diet 7-Up). The caffeinated beverages variable was created by summing the responses to the questions on low-calorie beverages with caffeine and carbonated beverages with caffeine and sugar, along with additional items that assessed intake of tea with caffeine including green tea (8 fluid ounces (237 ml)), coffee with caffeine (8 fluid ounces (237 ml)) and dairy coffee drink (e.g. cappuccino, 16 fluid ounces (473 ml)). These variables were treated as continuous.
Covariates
Demographic characteristics including sex, ethnicity/race, age, education and marital status were self-reported. Depressive symptoms were assessed via a six-item scale validated for use in young people( Reference Kandel and Davies 32 ). These six items asked about tiredness, difficulty sleeping, sadness, hopelessness, nervousness and worry over the past year, and were scored from 1 to 3. For the present analysis, we excluded two items related to sleep in the calculation of depressive symptoms and summed and categorized into approximate quartiles the remaining items on sadness, hopelessness, nervousness and worry. Physical activity was assessed with via three items from the Godin Leisure-time Exercise questionnaire, which asked about hours of mild, moderate and strenuous exercise in a usual week( Reference Godin and Shephard 35 ). Responses to these questions were used to calculate moderate–vigorous leisure activity in hours, which was modelled continuously. BMI was calculated via self-reported height and weight, which was strongly correlated with anthropometric measurements in a validation study during an earlier wave of Project EAT( Reference Quick, Wall and Larson 36 ). Alcohol was measured in grams. These variables were included as covariates due to their bidirectional relationships with sleep( Reference Kline 37 , Reference Franzen and Buysse 38 ).
Analysis
Descriptive statistics were calculated to examine sociodemographic and behavioural characteristics by category of time in bed. Based on the outcome, either linear or logistic regression was used to model the cross-sectional relationship between each sleep exposure and each dietary outcome. Adjusted probabilities standardized to the total population were calculated for each sleep category in the logistic models, and these probabilities were used to calculate prevalence ratios for each outcome. Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education and marital status, while Model 2 added depressive symptoms and physical activity. For models with sleep variability, timing and quality as the exposure, Model 3 added time in bed. Effect modification was also examined by gender, as previous research has found different relationships between sleep habits and dietary intake for men and women( Reference Spaeth, Dinges and Goel 39 ). Two sensitivity analyses were performed: one where we utilized an additional time in bed category of <6 h per night and one where we adjusted for BMI. All analyses used inverse probability weighting to account for differential loss to follow-up( Reference Little 40 ).
Results
The mean age in the analytic sample was 25·4 (sd 1·7) years and 55·6 % were female. Participants self-reported sleeping a mean of 8·3 (sd 1·2) h per night. The distribution of sleep times was: 11·5 % slept <7 h per night, 26·6 % slept 7–<8 h, 36·2 % slept 8–<9 h and 25·8 % slept ≥9 h per night. Regarding daily dietary intake, on average, participants consumed 0·9 servings of sugar-sweetened beverages, 0·7 servings of caffeinated beverages and 0·4 servings of sugar-free beverages. Per week, participants consumed breakfast an average of 3·9 times and ate something from a fast-food restaurant on 1·6 occasions. The proportion of the sample that reported consuming at least one energy drink per week was 18·0 %, and consuming at least one sports drink per week was reported by 30·2 %.
Table 1 shows sociodemographic and behavioural characteristics by time in bed category. Those who slept <7 h per night were more likely to be male, non-white, have less formal education and have a higher mean score for depressive symptoms relative to those who slept longer. Those with later bedtimes were more likely to be male, have less formal education and report higher mean depressive symptoms. Good sleep quality was more common among men and those with more education (data not shown).
Table 1 Participant characteristics by sleep duration category: young adults aged 20–30 years, Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area of Minnesota, USA, 2008–2009, Project EAT (Eating and Activity in Teens and Young Adults)
GED, General Educational Development; MVPA, moderate–vigorous physical activity.
† Row percentages.
‡ Caffeinated beverages were defined as low-calorie beverages with caffeine (e.g. Diet Coke, Diet Mountain Dew), carbonated beverages with caffeine and sugar (e.g. Coke, Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Dr. Pepper), tea with caffeine including green tea, coffee with caffeine and dairy coffee drink (e.g. cappuccino).
§ Sugar-sweetened beverages were defined as carbonated beverages with caffeine and sugar, other carbonated beverages with sugar (e.g. 7-Up, Root Beer, Ginger Ale, Caffeine-Free Coke) and other sugared beverages (punch, lemonade, sports drinks or sugared ice tea).
║ Sugar-free beverages were defined as low-calorie beverages with caffeine and other low-calorie beverages without caffeine (e.g. Diet 7-Up).
¶ Energy and sports drink consumption defined as at least one drink per week v. less than one drink per week.
Table 2 shows the mean intakes of beverages and mean frequency of skipping breakfast and eating at a fast-food restaurant by categories of sleep variables (time in bed, variability, timing and quality). After adjustment for demographics, some associations were found between sleep indices and eating behaviours, particularly for sleep timing, although many associations were not significant. Those who went to bed after 00.30 hours consumed 0·3 more servings of sugar-sweetened beverages per day, skipped breakfast 1·8 more times per week and consumed fast food 0·3 more times per week compared with those who went to bed before 22.30 hours. No strong associations were found between sleep timing and caffeinated or sugar-free beverages. Results were similar after adjustment for depressive symptoms, physical activity, alcohol and time in bed.
Table 2 Adjusted mean dietary intakes (95 % CI) by categories of sleep duration, variability, timing and quality: young adults aged 20–30 years, Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area of Minnesota, USA, 2008–2009, Project EAT (Eating and Activity in Teens and Young Adults)
Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education and marital status.
Model 2 added depression and physical activity.
Model 3 added time in bed.
Beverages measured in servings per day; breakfast and fast food servings per week.
*P<0·05, **P<0·01, ***P<0·001 compared with the referent category.
† Caffeinated beverages were defined as low-calorie beverages with caffeine (e.g. Diet Coke, Diet Mountain Dew), carbonated beverages with caffeine and sugar (e.g. Coke, Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Dr. Pepper), tea with caffeine including green tea, coffee with caffeine and dairy coffee drink (e.g. cappuccino).
‡ Sugar-sweetened beverages were defined as carbonated beverages with caffeine and sugar, other carbonated beverages with sugar (e.g. 7-Up, Root Beer, Ginger Ale, Caffeine-Free Coke) and other sugared beverages (punch, lemonade, sports drinks or sugared ice tea).
§ Sugar-free beverages were defined as low-calorie beverages with caffeine and other low-calorie beverages without caffeine (e.g. Diet 7-Up).
║ Sleep quality was assessed via the following question: ‘During the past 12 months, how often have you been bothered or troubled by having trouble going to sleep or staying asleep?’
For the remaining sleep indices, there were few strong statistically significant associations with the continuous eating behaviours after adjustment for demographics. Compared with those who slept 7–<8 h per night, those who slept <7 h consumed an average of approximately 0·2 more servings of caffeinated beverages per day (0·87 (95 % CI 0·71, 1·04) servings v. 0·66 (95 % CI 0·57, 0·75) servings; P=0·03). Compared with those with low sleep variability, those in the highest sleep variability quartile consumed fast food 0·3 more times per week (P=0·02). As an indicator of sleep quality, those reporting ‘very much’ difficulty falling/staying asleep skipped breakfast approximately one additional time every 10 d compared to those who reported no trouble falling/staying asleep (P<0·001).
Effect modification by sex was also examined and stratified analyses for significant multiplicative interaction terms can be found in Table 3. Although the frequency with which men skipped breakfast was unrelated to time in bed, women who slept <7 h per night skipped breakfast nearly one additional time per week compared with women who slept 7–<8 h (P for interaction=0·01). Men who went to bed after 00.30 hours consumed 0·5 more caffeinated beverages and 0·25 more sugar-free beverages daily than men who went to bed before 22.30 hours, while women consumed approximately the same amount of those beverages regardless of bedtime (P for interaction <0·01).
Table 3 Mean dietary intakes (95 % CI) by sleep indices stratified by sex: young adults aged 20–30 years, Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area of Minnesota, USA, 2008–2009, Project EAT (Eating and Activity in Teens and Young Adults)
Model 1 adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, education and marital status.
Model 2 added depression, and physical activity.
Model 3 added time in bed.
Breakfast consumption measured in servings per week; beverages in servings per day.
*P<0·05, **P<0·01, ***P<0·001 compared with the referent category.
† Caffeinated beverages were defined as low-calorie beverages with caffeine (e.g. Diet Coke, Diet Mountain Dew), carbonated beverages with caffeine and sugar (e.g. Coke, Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Dr. Pepper), tea with caffeine including green tea, coffee with caffeine and dairy coffee drink (e.g. cappuccino).
‡ Sugar-free beverages were defined as low-calorie beverages with caffeine and other low-calorie beverages without caffeine (e.g. Diet 7-Up).
Table 4 shows prevalence ratios (PR) for intakes of energy and sports drinks (modelled dichotomously: at least one drink per week and less than one drink per week) by sleep exposure category. After adjustment for demographics, those who slept fewer hours, had more sleep variability, reported later bedtimes and reported ‘very much’ difficulty falling/staying asleep were more likely to consume energy drinks, although the associations were not statistically significant across all models. For sleep timing, those who reported going to bed after 00.30 hours were 1·83 (95 % CI 1·10, 2·55) times more likely to consume at least one energy drink per week than those who went to bed at 22.30 hours or earlier. Those who reported ≥8 h of sleep were less likely to consume sports drinks than those who slept 7–<8 h per night, while those who reported ‘very much’ difficulty falling/staying asleep were more likely to consume sports drinks than those who reported no difficulty (PR =1·24 (95 % CI 0·99, 1·49)).
Table 4 Prevalence ratios (95 % CI) for intakes of energy drinks and sports drinks by sleep duration, variability, timing and quality: young adults aged 20–30 years, Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area of Minnesota, USA, 2008–2009, Project EAT (Eating and Activity in Teens and Young Adults)
PR, prevalence ratio; Ref., referent category.
Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education and marital status.
Model 2 added depression and physical activity.
Model 3 added sleep duration.
*P<0·05, **P<0·01, ***P <0·001.
† Energy and sports drink consumption defined as at least one drink per week v. less than one drink per week.
‡ Sleep quality was assessed via the following question: ‘During the past 12 months, how often have you been bothered or troubled by having trouble going to sleep or staying asleep?’
Sensitivity analyses were also performed for all outcomes with an additional time in bed category: <6 h (see online supplementary material, Supplemental Tables 1 and 2). Although precision was poor, those who slept for <6 h per night drank approximately 0·35 more daily servings of caffeinated drinks, 0·45 more daily servings of sugar-sweetened beverages and skipped breakfast one additional time every 10 d compared with those who slept 7–<8 h. Those who slept <6 h were also more likely to consume energy drinks (PR=1·55 (95 % CI 0·59, 2·50)). No statistically significant associations were found for sugar-free beverages, fast food or sports drinks. In the second sensitivity analysis which adjusted for BMI in an additional model, no appreciable changes in the estimates were detected (online supplementary material, Supplemental Tables 3 and 4).
Discussion
In this population-based study of young adults, we provide new evidence that sleep characteristics beyond time in bed are associated with selected eating and drinking behaviours. Late sleep timing was most consistently associated with poor eating and drinking behaviours, including consumption of energy drinks, sugar-sweetened beverages, fast food and breakfast skipping. Fewer associations were found for other sleep indices.
In the present study, going to sleep late was directly associated with four of the seven poor eating and drinking behaviours, including more frequent consumption of energy drinks and sugar-sweetened beverages, and frequency of eating at fast-food restaurants, as well as breakfast skipping. These findings are consistent with another small cross-sectional study, where actigraphy-measured late sleep timing was associated with more servings of full-calorie soda and fast food per week, although results were not adjusted for confounders( Reference Baron, Reid and Kern 18 ). Previous research also found that delaying bedtime was not associated with more caffeine use( Reference Regestein, Natarajan and Pavlova 41 ), while we found a small association between sleep timing and caffeinated beverages that was no longer significant after adjustments for depressive symptoms, alcohol and physical activity. Research on other dietary measures has found actigraphy-measured sleep timing was not associated with the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 or any of its components( Reference Mossavar-Rahmani, Weng and Wang 42 ). An alternative explanation for these findings may be night eating syndrome, which is characterized by ‘recurrent episodes of night eating, as manifested by eating after awakening from sleep or by excessive food consumption after the evening meal’( 43 ). However, this syndrome requires that sleep–wake changes not be the best explanation for the night eating.
Less time in bed, an approximation of sleep duration, was associated with more caffeinated beverage consumption, while more time in bed was associated with less sports drink consumption. The relationship between sleep duration (or time in bed) and eating and drinking behaviours has been examined more frequently in previous literature than the relationships between other sleep indices and eating and drinking behaviours. Observational studies on time in bed or sleep duration and caffeinated beverages have similarly found inverse associations( Reference Kant and Graubard 15 , Reference Regestein, Natarajan and Pavlova 41 , Reference Watson, Coates and Kohler 44 , Reference Sanchez-Ortuno, Moore and Taillard 45 ), although one found no association( Reference Sanchez-Ortuno, Moore and Taillard 45 ). Additionally, those who slept fewer than 6 h per night were more likely to skip breakfast( Reference Kant and Graubard 15 ) and consume sugar-sweetened beverages, including caffeinated beverages, than those who slept 7–8 h per night( Reference Prather, Leung and Adler 46 ). In the current study, the proportion sleeping at least 7 h per night was 88·5 %, which contrasts with national survey data where only 67·8 % of 18–24-year-olds and 62·1 % of 25–34-year-olds reported sleeping at least 7 h per night, although the self-report methods of these two studies were different( Reference Liu, Wheaton and Chapman 9 ). Because of the narrow distribution of sleep in our sample, we did not have sufficient precision to consider more extreme categories of shorter sleep duration as the primary exposure, although in sensitivity analyses we showed that those who slept fewer than 6 h per night skipped more breakfast and consumed more sugar-sweetened beverages than those sleeping 7–8 h per night. Studies of adults and adolescents have reported that those with short sleep duration ate fast food more often than those meeting sleep recommendations( Reference Stamatakis and Brownson 16 , Reference Kruger, Reither and Peppard 47 ), a finding not replicated in our study.
In the present study, poor sleep quality was significantly associated with six of the seven poor eating and drinking behaviours, but associations remained only for energy drinks, sports drinks and skipping breakfast after adjustment for depressive symptoms, alcohol and physical activity. Previous research on sleep quality and intake of caffeine/energy drinks has been mixed, with studies finding null( Reference Watson, Coates and Kohler 44 , Reference Lund, Reider and Whiting 48 ) or inverse associations( Reference Reid and Baker 49 – Reference Sanchez, Martinez and Oriol 52 ). However, a study of Japanese female workers found that poor sleep quality was associated with greater sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and breakfast skipping( Reference Katagiri, Asakura and Kobayashi 53 ). Studies involving other dietary and eating measures have found associations between poor sleep quality and low intake of vegetables and fish( Reference Katagiri, Asakura and Kobayashi 53 ), as well as lower adherence to the Mediterranean diet.
Sleep variability has been rarely measured in population-based studies, especially in relation to diet. In the present study high sleep variability was associated with greater fast-food and energy drink consumption. Previous studies have found positive associations between sleep variability and obesity( Reference Patel, Hayes and Blackwell 54 , Reference Ogilvie, Redline and Bertoni 55 ), including a mediating influence of diet variables( Reference He, Bixler and Liao 56 ), although no association was found in a previous Project EAT analysis( Reference Meyer, Wall and Larson 25 ).
Overall, in the present study, associations between sleep and eating and drinking behaviours were not consistent across indices. This may reflect measurement error, as described below, or may indicate unique dimensions of sleep. While some aspects of sleep, like duration, can be measured objectively, self-reported sleep quality is inherently subjective, and thus may capture a different aspect of the sleep process or reflect differences in self-reporting. In the present study, the four sleep indices used were weakly correlated (r<0·2). Future research should continue to focus on multiple dimensions to obtain a complete picture of sleep. Prospective data are also needed to further elucidate the relationship between sleep and dietary intake.
We observed effect modification by sex for some exposure–outcome combinations. Previous laboratory research also found differences, where men consumed more daily energy than women after sleep restriction( Reference Spaeth, Dinges and Goel 39 ). Differences could be due to gender biology (e.g. levels of hormones), differences in social desirability that impact self-reporting, or ways that society influences coping during sleep restriction periods differentially by gender( Reference Dzaja, Arber and Hislop 57 ). In general, sleep duration is longer in women than men( Reference Chen, Wang and Zee 58 , Reference Lauderdale, Knutson and Yan 59 ).
The relationship between sleep and diet is likely complex, and potentially bidirectional. Caffeinated drinks, such as soda and energy drinks, block adenosine receptors, which prevent the sleep-promoting effects of adenosine and thus reduce sleep duration. However, people who are sleep deprived may consume more caffeinated drinks to feel more alert( Reference Roehrs and Roth 60 ). Short sleep duration may also influence diet by providing more time and opportunities for eating and drinking, allowing people to be more sensitive to food rewards, decreasing restraint and changing concentrations of hormones that influence appetite, such as leptin and ghrelin( Reference Chaput 61 ). However, limited evidence also suggests that nutrients that help synthesize serotonin may also promote sleep( Reference Peuhkuri, Sihvola and Korpela 62 ).
Other sleep indices likely act through similar pathways. Although the mechanisms for associations between sleep timing and diet are not fully elucidated, possible mechanisms include circadian disruption and greater exposure to light at night( Reference Obayashi, Saeki and Iwamoto 63 , Reference Ramsey and Bass 64 ). People with high sleep variability may also have irregular eating patterns due to variation in their sleep–wake pattern, which may contribute to irregularity in the synchronization of eating and sleep timing( Reference Patel, Hayes and Blackwell 54 ).
The present study has several limitations, including measurement error in the sleep and dietary variables, which were both assessed via survey. Self-reported and objectively measured sleep are moderately correlated( Reference Cespedes, Hu and Redline 65 – Reference Patel, Blackwell and Ancoli-Israel 67 ), but the degree of correlation varies by important confounders such as obesity and depression. Dietary intake was self-reported and likely represents an underestimation of intake. Previous research has found moderate to high reproducibility and validity of FFQ compared with diet records, although both measures are self-reported( Reference Feskanich, Rimm and Giovannucci 34 ). Combined, these errors in measurement may have biased the estimates towards (likely) or away from the null (less likely). Additionally, the present cross-sectional study inherently offers no information on temporality and the causal pathway between sleep and diet is at times unclear, particularly for caffeine and energy drinks. These associations between sleep and diet may also be due to a shared cause. We also performed many statistical tests, so it is possible that some of the results may be due to chance.
Despite these limitations, our study has several strengths. Quality observational studies on sleep duration and dietary intake are limited, due to an emphasis on short-term experiments conducted in sleep labs, which do not provide information on habitual behaviours among free-living adults. Another strength of the present study is the diverse and population-based sample of young adults. Use of this sample aligns with the 2016 American Heart Association Scientific Statement that highlighted the need for sleep studies to include diverse populations( Reference St-Onge, Grandner and Brown 24 ). Additionally, the measurement instruments used in the study employed multiple indices of sleep and diet, which allowed the capture of these behaviours in several different dimensions.
Sleep and diet are both inherently vital health behaviours. Short sleep duration is highly prevalent, especially among young adults( Reference Liu, Wheaton and Chapman 9 ). Dietary quality may be improving( Reference Rehm, Penalvo and Afshin 68 ), but the vast majority of the US population is still not meeting dietary recommendations. Although the present study found some cross-sectional associations between sleep and eating behaviours, particularly as related to sleep timing, many associations were not significant, and further longitudinal and randomized studies with objective measures of sleep are needed to clarify the directionality of the sleep–diet relationship. Young adults often experience significant changes in their establishment of an independent life, including attainment of higher education, new employment, getting married and having children. As such, if the relationships found between sleep and eating behaviours herein are causal, sleep-friendly interventions and policies may have the potential, along with other risk factors, to reduce obesity in this population. Identifying effective obesity prevention measures for young adults is particularly important, as at this age range there is the potential to set long-term health habits. Additionally, nutrition professionals could informally screen for poor sleep or a sleep disorder and make referrals to a sleep specialist as necessary( Reference Golem, Martin-Biggers and Koenings 69 ).
Acknowledgements
Financial support: This research was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (grant numbers R01-HL-084064, T32-HL-007779 and T32-HL-082610). The NHLBI had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article. Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. Authorship: R.P.O. formulated the research question, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. P.L.L. helped formulated the research, provided input on the analysis, and read and reviewed the manuscript. R.W. and M.N.L. helped formulate the research question and read and reviewed the manuscript. N.L. read and reviewed the manuscript. D.N.-S. designed and obtained grant funding for the study and read and reviewed the manuscript. Ethics of human subject participation: The University of Minnesota IRB approved all study protocols and participants provided informed consent.
Supplementary material
To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980017003536
