Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:38:30.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Propagation Effects on the Cyclotron Maser Mechanism for Solar Microwave Spike Bursts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

Z. Kuncic
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical Physics and Research Center for Theoretical Astrophysics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006
P.A. Robinson
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical Physics and Research Center for Theoretical Astrophysics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006

Abstract

The loss-cone-driven electron cyclotron maser instability is widely believed to be responsible for millisecond bursts of intense microwave emission often observed during solar flares. However, the maser radiation is strongly absorbed as it propagates outward from the corona and existing analytical models predict that this absorption should be sufficiently strong to prevent observable levels of the radiation from escaping, except under highly restrictive conditions. In order to address the problem of how microwave spike bursts can be observed at all, we present a numerical ray-tracing analysis which incorporates emission, propagation and absorption of fundamental cyclotron maser radiation in a realistic model of a coronal flux loop. It is found that the radiation can escape to a potential observer and that the physical conditions under which escape occurs are more restrictive for fundamental emission in the extraordinary (x)-mode than in the ordinary (0)-mode. Escaping radiation in the x-mode is found to be highly directional and chiefly observable toward the center of the solar disk, while escaping 0-mode radiation is found to emerge from the corona over a much wider range of directions, with some cases corresponding to observable radiation near the solar limb.

Type
Solar and Solar System
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crannell, C.J., Dulk, G.A., Kosugi, T. and Magun, A., 1988, Solar Phys, 118, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulk, G.A., 1985, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys, 23, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güdel, M. and Zlobec, P., 1991, Astron. Astrophys, 245, 299.Google Scholar
Hewitt, R.G., Melrose, D.B. and Rönnmark, K.G., 1982, Aust. J. Phys., 35, 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, G.D., Eichler, D. and Kundu, M.R., 1980, in IAU Symp. 86,Radio Physics of the Sun, Kundu, M.R. and Gergely, T.E. (eds), Dordrecht, Reidel, p. 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuncic, Z. and Robinson, P.A., 1993, Solar Phys. (in press).Google Scholar
McKean, M.E., Winglee, R.M. and Dulk, G.A., 1989, Solar Phys, 122, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melrose, D.B., 1986, Instabilities in Space and Laboratory Plasmas, CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melrose, D.B. and Dulk, G.A., 1982a, Astrophys. J, 259, L41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melrose, D.B. and Dulk, G.A., 1982b, Astrophys. J, 259, 844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melrose, D.B. and Dulk, G.A., 1984, Astrophys. J, 282, 308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melrose, D.B., Hewitt, R.G. and Duil, G.A., 1984, J. Geophys. Res, 89, 897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.A., 1991a, Solar Phys, 134, 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.A., 1991b, Solar Phys, 136, 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slottje, C., 1978, Nature, 275, 520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slottje, C., 1980, in IAU Symp. 86, Radio Physics of the Sun, Kundu, M.R. and Gergely, T.E. (eds), Dordrecht, Reidel, p. 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C.S. and Lee, L.C., 1979, Astrophys. J, 230, 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar