Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:45:13.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Solar Neutrino Problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

D.J. Faulkner
D.J. Faulkner*
Affiliation:
Mount Stromlo and Siding Spring Observatory, Research School of Physical Sciences, Australian National University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A few years ago Fowler (1972) published a paper in which he proposed two ‘desperate explanations’ for the solar neutrino problem. Desperation continues to be characteristic of the subject, for, in spite of many investigations over recent years, there is still no unambiguously successful model satisfying all the observational features of the Sun and giving a predicted neutrino count rate below the Davis (1972) experimental limit.

Type
Invited Papers
Information
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , Volume 2 , Issue 6 , October 1975 , pp. 318 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, Z., and Iben, I. Jr., Astrophys. J., 170, 157 (1971).Google Scholar
Bancall, J.N., Cabibbo, N., and Yahil, A., Phys. Rev. Lett., 28, 316 (1972).Google Scholar
Bancall, J.N., Huebner, W.F., Magee, N.H., Merts, A.L., and Ulrich, R.K., Astrophys. J., 184, 1 (1973).Google Scholar
Bancall, J.N., and Ulrich, R.K., Astrophys. J., 170, 593 (1971).Google Scholar
Bartenwerfer, D., Astron. and Astrophys., 25, 455 (1973).Google Scholar
Carson, T.R., Ezer, D., and Stothers, R., Astrophys. J., 194, 743 (1974).Google Scholar
Chapman, G. A., Phys Rev. Lett., 34, 755 (1975).Google Scholar
Chitre, S.M., Ezer, D., and Stothers, R., Astrophys. Lett., 14, 37 (1973).Google Scholar
Clayton, D.D., Nature, 249, 131 (1974).Google Scholar
Davis, R. Jr., Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc, 17, 527 (1972).Google Scholar
Demarque, P., Mengel, J.G., and Sweigart, A.V., Astrophys. J., 183, 997 (1973a).Google Scholar
Demarque, P., Mengel, J.G., and Sweigart, A.V., Nature Phys. Sci., 246, 33 (1973b).Google Scholar
Demarque, P., Mengel, J.G., and Sweigart, A.V., Nature, 252, 368 (1974).Google Scholar
Dicke, R. H.,Ann. Rev. Astron. and Astrophys., 8, 297 (1970).Google Scholar
Dicke, R.H., and Goldenberg, H.M., Astrophys. J. Suppl., 27, 131, (1974).Google Scholar
Dilke, F.W.W., and Gough, D.O., Nature, 240, 262 (1972).Google Scholar
Ezer, D., and Cameron, A.G.W., Nature Phys. Sci, 240, 180 (1972).Google Scholar
Faulkner, D.J., Da Costa, G.S., and Prentice, A.J.R., Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc, 170, 589 (1975).Google Scholar
Fowler, W.A., Nature, 238, 24 (1972).Google Scholar
Hill, H.A., Clayton, P.D., Patz, D.L., Healy, A.W., Stebbins, R.T.,Oleson, J.R., and Zanoni, C.A., Rhys. Rev. Lett., 33, 1497 (1974).Google Scholar
Joss, P.C., Astrophys. J., 191, 771 (1974).Google Scholar
Newman, M.J., Clayton, D.D., Talbot, R.J., and Dwek, E., Bull. A.A.S., 6, 464 (1974).Google Scholar
Parker, P.D., Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc, 18, 49 (1973).Google Scholar
Prentice, A.J.R., Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc, 163, 331 (1973a).Google Scholar
Prentice, A.J.R., Proc A.S.A., 2, 226 (1973b).Google Scholar
Rood, R.T., Nature Phys. Sci., 240, 178 (1972).Google Scholar
Rood, R.T., and Ulrich, R.K., Nature, 252, 366 (1974).Google Scholar
Roxburgh, I.W., Nature, 248, 209 (1974).Google Scholar
Ulrich, R.K., Astrophys. J., 188, 369 (1974).Google Scholar
Ulrich, R.K., and Rood, R.T., Nature Phys. Sci., 241, 111 (1973).Google Scholar
Wheeler, J.C., and Cameron, A.G.W., Astrophys. J., 196, 601(1975).Google Scholar