Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:40:04.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studying Galactic Chemical Properties by using Cosmological Numerical Simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Patricia B. Tissera*
Affiliation:
Institute for Astronomy and Space Physics, CONICET, Argentina
Cecilia Scannapieco
Affiliation:
Institute for Astronomy and Space Physics, CONICET, Argentina
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We developed a chemical code within gadget2 which allows the description of the enrichment of the Universe as a function of redshift, taking into account detailed metal production by supernovae Ia and II, and metal-dependent cooling. This is the first numerical code that includes both chemical production and metal-dependent cooling in a cosmological context. By analysing the cosmic star formation rate, we found that the effects of considering a metal-dependent cooling are important, principally, for z ≤ 3. In simulations where primordial cooling functions are used, the comoving star formation rate could be up to 20%; lower than those obtained in runs with metal-dependent cooling functions. Within galaxy-like objects, the presence of chemical elements changes the star-formation rates and, consequently, the chemical production and patterns of stars. However, owing to non-linear evolution of the structure, the effects depend on the evolutionary history path of each galaxy-like object.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 2004

References

Barton, E. J., Geller, M. J., & Kenyon, S. J. 2000, ApJ, 530, 660 Google Scholar
Freeman, K., & Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2002, ARA&A, 40, 487 Google Scholar
Lambas, D. G., Tissera, P. B., Alonso, M. S., & Coldwell, G. 2003, MNRAS, in pressGoogle Scholar
Lia, C., Portinari, L., & Carraro, G. 2002, MNRAS, 330, 821 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosconi, M. B., Tissera, P. B., Lambas, D. G., & Cora, S. A. 2001, MNRAS, 325, 34 Google Scholar
Springel, V., & Hernquist, L. 2002, MNRAS, 333, 649 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, R. S., & Dopita, M. A. 1993, ApJS, 88, 253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thielemann, F. K., Nomoto, K., & Hashimoto, M. 1993, in Origin and Evolution of the Elements, eds. N. Prantzos, E. Vangoni-Flam, & N. Cassé (Cambridge: CUP), p. 299 Google Scholar
Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. 1995, ApJS, 101, 181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yepes, G., Elizondo, D., & Ascasibar, Y. 1998, Ap&SS, 263, 31 Google Scholar