Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:12:01.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chiral discrimination in NMR spectroscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2015

A. David Buckingham*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK
*
* Author for correspondence: A. David Buckingham, Department of Chemistry, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK. Tel.: +44-1223-336458; Fax: +44-1223-336362; Email: adb1000@cam.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nuclear magnetic resonance is the most important form of molecular spectroscopy in chemistry and biochemistry but it is normally blind to chirality. It was predicted in 2004 that precessing nuclear spins in chiral molecules in a liquid in a strong magnetic field induce a rotating electric polarization that is of opposite sign for enantiomers. This polarization arises from the distortion of the electronic structure by the nuclear magnetic moment in the presence of the strong magnetic field and is equivalent to the linear effect of an electric field on the nuclear shielding tensor. The polarization is strongly enhanced in dipolar molecules through the partial orientation of the permanent dipole through the antisymmetric part of the nuclear magnetic shielding tensor. Alternatively, an applied electric field will induce a chirally sensitive magnetization perpendicular to the field and to the nuclear spin. Progress towards the experimental realization of chiral discrimination by NMR is assessed.

Type
Perspective
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015

Introduction

High-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy is an important technique for determining the structure of molecules in solution. The molecular properties that determine an NMR spectrum, namely the chemical shift and the nuclear spin–spin coupling constant, are identical for a molecule and its mirror image. These second-rank tensor properties $\sigma _{\alpha \beta} ^{({\rm N})} $ and $J_{\alpha \beta} ^{({\rm NN}{\rm ^{\prime}})} $ , where N and N′ are two nuclei with spin, are even under the parity operator $\hat P$ that inverts the coordinates of all particles in the molecule and therefore converts one enantiomer of a chiral molecule into the other. For chiral sensitivity one looks for properties that are even under time-reversal $\hat T$ and odd under $\hat P$ , like the optical rotational strength, which is the imaginary part of the scalar product of electric and magnetic transition dipole moments (Barron, Reference Barron2004). The linear dependence of $\sigma _{\alpha \beta} ^{({\rm N})} $ on an electric field E is determined by the third-rank tensor $\sigma _{\alpha \beta \gamma} ^{(1)({\rm N})} $ which is odd under $\hat P$ and even under $\hat T$ . It has been shown (Buckingham, Reference Buckingham2004; Buckingham & Fischer, Reference Buckingham and Fischer2006) that the isotropic part of $\sigma _{\alpha \beta \gamma} ^{(1)({\rm N})} $ , viz. ${\bar \sigma ^{(1)({\rm N})}}{\varepsilon _{\alpha \beta \gamma}} $ , where ε α βγ is the third-rank skew-symmetric unit tensor and ${\bar \sigma ^{(1)({\rm N})}} = (1/6){\varepsilon _{\alpha \beta \gamma}} \sigma _{\alpha \beta \gamma} ^{(1)({\rm N})} $ is a pseudoscalar which vanishes for achiral molecules, leads to a rotating electric polarization perpendicular to the precessing nuclear magnetic moment and to the applied magnetic field B (0). Each line in the NMR spectrum of a chiral molecule has an associated positive or negative signal at the same frequency, as occurs in circular dichroism and vibrational circular dichroism (Stephens et al. Reference Stephens, Devlin and Cheeseman2012) but these chirally sensitive spectral lines are yet to be observed in NMR.

Computations of ${\bar \sigma ^{(1)({\rm N})}}$ (Buckingham & Fischer, Reference Buckingham and Fischer2006; Lazzeretti et al. Reference Lazzeretti, Soncini and Zanasi2008; Monaco & Zanasi Reference Monaco and Zanasi2011; Pelloni et al. Reference Pelloni, Faglioni and Lazzeretti2013; Zanasi et al. Reference Zanasi, Pelloni and Lazzeretti2007) have shown that its contribution to the electric polarization is likely to be too small for easy detection, even for heavier nuclei such as 13C and 19F. However, a recent Communication (Buckingham, Reference Buckingham2014) showed that there is an additional contribution to the rotating polarization in the case of dipolar molecules; the permanent electric dipole moment μ (0) contributes a temperature-dependent orientation polarization through the torque exerted on the dipole by the precessing nuclear magnetic moment through the antisymmetric part of $\sigma _{\alpha \beta} ^{({\rm N})} $ . The molecular properties that give the rotating electric polarization associated with precessing nuclear spins following a π/2 pulse are ${\bar \sigma ^{(1)({\rm N})}} + {\bar P^{({\rm N})}}/kT$ , where k is the Boltzmann constant, T the absolute temperature, and the pseudoscalar ${\bar P^{({\rm N})}}$ for nucleus N is (a repeated Greek suffix implies a sum over all three Cartesian components)

(1) $$\eqalign{&\displaystyle{{{{\bar P}^{({\rm N})}} = {1\over 6}{\Big (}{\varepsilon _{\alpha \beta \gamma }}\mu _\alpha ^{(0)} \sigma _{\beta \gamma }^{({\rm N})} \Big)} } \cr & \hskip 6pt \quad = {1\over 6}\displaystyle{\matrix{\left[ {\mu _z^{(0)} (\sigma _{xy}^{({\rm N})} - \sigma _{yx}^{({\rm N})} ) + \mu _x^{(0)} (\sigma _{yz}^{({\rm N})} - \sigma _{zy}^{({\rm N})} )} \right. \cr \left. {\quad + \mu _y^{(0)} (\sigma _{zx}^{({\rm N})} - \sigma _{xz}^{({\rm N})} )} \right]} }} $$

Computations on the HOOF molecule (Buckingham, Reference Buckingham2014) indicate that at room temperature this orientation polarization is two or three orders of magnitude larger than the distortion polarization due to ${\bar \sigma ^{(1)}}$ , thus improving the prospects of achieving chiral discrimination in NMR spectroscopy.

A recent paper (Buckingham et al. Reference Buckingham, Lazzeretti and Pelloni2015) reports results of computations of ${\bar \sigma ^{(1)}}$ and $\bar P/kT$ for nine small chiral molecules containing heavier atoms such as 13C, 15N, 17O, 19F, 33S, 77Se and 125Te as well as protons; it confirms the large enhancement due to dipolar orientation.

An alternative approach (Buckingham & Fischer, Reference Buckingham and Fischer2006) to the detection of chirally sensitive NMR signals is through the precessing magnetization induced by an applied electric field E . In an isotropic sample, this magnetization is proportional to the vector product of the nuclear magnetization and E . Like the induced electric polarization, it is dependent on ${\bar \sigma ^{(1)}} + \bar P/kT$ , but the temperature-dependent term now arises from the orientation of the permanent dipole by the electric field; if E is a low-frequency field, then even large molecules will be able to respond to its oscillations. In the case of the precessing electric polarization arising from the torque exerted on the molecules through the antisymmetric part of the nuclear magnetic shielding tensor, the molecules need to be able to respond to the precessing nuclear magnetization, i.e. to the NMR frequency. This would be a problem for very large molecules.

Discussion

Chiral discrimination in high-resolution NMR spectroscopy could be observed through the rotating electric polarization generated by magnetic nuclei precessing in the plane perpendicular to the magnetic field B (0) following a π/2 pulse (Buckingham, Reference Buckingham2004; Buckingham & Fischer, Reference Buckingham and Fischer2006) or through the magnetization induced by an electric field E (Buckingham & Fischer, Reference Buckingham and Fischer2006). In both cases, the signal is determined by $\left\vert{\bar \sigma ^{(1)}} + \bar P/kT \right\vert$ (Buckingham, Reference Buckingham2014; Buckingham & Fischer, Reference Buckingham and Fischer2006). For dipolar molecules – and that includes all chiral molecules except those of D n symmetry – computations show that at room temperature the magnitude of   $\bar P/kT$ is normally much greater than that of ${\bar \sigma ^{(1)}}$ (Buckingham, Reference Buckingham2014; Buckingham et al. Reference Buckingham, Lazzeretti and Pelloni2015). The nature of the torque orienting the molecule through the antisymmetric components of $\sigma _{\alpha \beta} ^{({\rm N})} $ can be understood as follows: the antisymmetric part of   $\sigma _{\alpha \beta} ^{({\rm N})} $ can be represented as ${\varepsilon _{\alpha \beta \gamma}} \,\,\sigma _\gamma ^{\ast ({\rm N})} $ where $\sigma _{}^{\ast ({\rm N})} $ is a polar vector (Buckingham, Reference Buckingham2014; Jeffreys, Reference Jeffreys1931). Thus for a nucleus N on the symmetry axis of a chiral molecule of C 3 symmetry, there is one non-zero component of $\sigma _{}^{\ast ({\rm N})} $ (Birss, Reference Birss1966), namely $\sigma _z^{\ast ({\rm N})} = (\sigma _{xy}^{({\rm N})} - \sigma _{yx}^{({\rm N})} )/2$ where x, y and z are molecule-fixed axes. The antisymmetric shielding contribution to the nuclear shielding spin Hamiltonian $\sigma _{\alpha \beta} ^{({\rm N})} {\rm m}_\alpha ^{({\rm N})} B_\beta ^{({\rm 0})} $ is ${\varepsilon _{\alpha \beta \gamma}} \,\,\sigma _\gamma ^{\ast ({\rm N})} \,{\rm m}_\alpha ^{({\rm N})} B_\beta ^{({\rm 0})} = {\sigma ^{\ast ({\rm N})}}\cdot ({{\bf m}^{(N)}} \times {{\bi B}^{{\rm (0)}}})$ ; if $\sigma _z^{\ast ({\rm N})} $ is negative there is a lowering of energy when the molecular z-axis is in the direction of the vector product of the nuclear magnetic moment m (N)and the magnetic field B (0), causing the molecule, with its dipole $\mu _z^{(0)} $ , to favour this direction and leading to electric polarization precessing in the plane perpendicular to B (0) at right angles to the nuclear magnetization.

In the case of the nuclear magnetization induced by an applied electric field E , the energy of the molecule is changed by − μ (0)· E , causing the antisymmetric part of the nuclear shielding tensor to induce magnetization in the direction m (N) ×  E (Buckingham & Fischer, Reference Buckingham and Fischer2006).

The results of computations of ${\bar \sigma ^{(1)}}$ and $\bar P/kT$ (Buckingham, Reference Buckingham2014; Buckingham et al. Reference Buckingham, Lazzeretti and Pelloni2015) give hope that NMR experiments will soon provide chiral discrimination as in other forms of spectroscopy. Estimates of alternating voltages of the order of 1 nV for signals from protons in pure chiral liquids (Buckingham & Fischer, Reference Buckingham and Fischer2006) increase to 1 μV and substantially higher for heavier nuclei because of the dominance of $\bar P/kT$ . The contribution of the rotating dipole depends on the polar molecule being able to follow the precessing nuclear spins, but this should not be a problem for small polar molecules for which dielectric loss occurs at frequencies from 3 to 300 GHz (Hill et al. Reference Hill, Vaughan, Price and Davies1969) but will be a factor for large molecules. Application of a low-frequency electric field E and detection of the induced magnetization could obviate this problem as well as providing potentially valuable discrimination through the modulation of E .

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to express his indebtedness to Professor Dr Peer Fischer, Dr Piotr Garbacz, Dr Steffen Krämer and Dr Geert Rikken for their involvement with him in the experimental search for chirally sensitive NMR signals.

References

Barron, L. D. (2004). Molecular Light Scattering and Optical Activity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 33 and 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birss, R. R. (1966). Symmetry and Magnetism. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Buckingham, A. D. (2004). Chirality in NMR spectroscopy. Chemical Physics Letters 398, 15.Google Scholar
Buckingham, A. D. (2014). Communication: permanent dipoles contribute to electric polarization in chiral NMR spectra. Journal of Chemical Physics 140, 011103-1-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckingham, A. D. & Fischer, P. (2006). Direct chiral discrimination in NMR spectroscopy. Chemical Physics 324, 111116.Google Scholar
Buckingham, A. D., Lazzeretti, P. & Pelloni, S. (2015). Chiral discrimination in NMR spectroscopy: computation of the relevant molecular pseudoscalars. Molecular Physics (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, N. E., Vaughan, W. E., Price, A. H. & Davies, M. (1969). Dielectric Properties and Molecular Behaviour. London: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, p. 303.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, H. (1931). Cartesian Tensors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, chapter VII.Google Scholar
Lazzeretti, P., Soncini, A. & Zanasi, R. (2008). Response tensors for chiral discrimination in NMR spectroscopy. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts 119, 99106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monaco, G. & Zanasi, R. (2011). Searching for a good candidate to perform a chiral nuclear magnetic resonance experiment in disordered phase: a study of 8,9-difluoro-P-hexahelicene. Chirality 23, 752755.Google Scholar
Pelloni, S., Faglioni, F. & Lazzeretti, P. (2013). Chiral discrimination via nuclear magnetic resonsnce spectroscopy. Rendiconti Fiz. Acc. Lincei 24, 283289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, P. J., Devlin, F. J. & Cheeseman, J. R. (2012). VCD Spectroscopy for Organic Chemists. London: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Zanasi, R., Pelloni, S. & Lazzeretti, P. (2007). Chiral discrimination via nuclear magnetic shielding polarizabilities from NMR spectroscopy: theoretical study of (R a)-1,3-dimethylallene, (2R)-2-methyloxirane, and (2R)-N-methyloxaziridine. Journal of Computational Chemistry 28, 21592163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar