Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:51:12.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electron spin resonance optical dating of marine, estuarine, and aeolian sediments in Florida, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kevin E. Burdette ,
William J. Rink ,
David J. Mallinson ,
Guy H. Means  and
Peter R. Parham
Kevin E. Burdette*
Affiliation:
School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4K1
William J. Rink
Affiliation:
School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4K1
David J. Mallinson
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
Guy H. Means
Affiliation:
Florida Geological Survey, 903 W. Tennessee Street, Tallahassee, FL 32304-7716, USA
Peter R. Parham
Affiliation:
Institute of Oceanography, University Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Terengganu 21300, Malaysia
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail address:keb1003@gmail.com (K.E. Burdette).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For the first time, electron spin resonance optical dating (ESROD) has been conducted on littorally transported and aeolian siliciclastic sediments in Florida. ESROD utilizes light-sensitive radiation-sensitive defects at silicon sites that have been replaced by aluminum and titanium atoms to give rise to a time-dependant signal. These defects saturate at higher levels of radiation dose, compared to optically stimulated luminescence, and therefore extend the optical dating range back into the millions of years. Our results show that the Trail Ridge Sequence is a multi-depositional unit that began deposition around 2.2 Ma and continued until 6 ka. The Osceola Cape, of the Effingham Sequence, was deposited around 1.5 Ma, and the Chatham Sequence was a multi-depositional terrace with at least three events preserved.

Keywords

Electron spin resonance optical datingOptically stimulated luminescenceFloridaCenozoic sea level
Type
Research Article
Information
Quaternary Research , Volume 79 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 66 - 74
Copyright
University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, P.N., Opdyke, N.D., and Jaeger, J.M. Isostatic uplift driven by karstification and sea-level oscillation: modeling landscape evolution in north Florida. Geology 38, (2010). 531–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beerten, K., Lomax, J., Clemer, K., Stesmans, A., and Radtke, U. On the use of Ti centers for estimating burial ages of Pleistocene sedimentary quartz; multiple-grain data from Australia. Quaternary Geochronology 1, (2006). 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumby, S. Regression analysis of ESR/TL dose response data. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurement 20, (1992). 595–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burdette, K., (2010). Pleistocene Stratigraphy and Optical Dating of Surficial Sands in Florida's Coastal Plain and Central Highlands: Implications for Sea-Level and Shoreline Ages. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario., 128 pp.Google Scholar
Burdette, K., Rink, W.J., Means, G.H., Portell, R.W. Optical Dating of the Anastasia Formation 46, (2009). Southeastern Geology, Northeastern Florida, USA. 173–185.Google Scholar
Burdette, K., Rink, W.J., Mallinson, D., Parham, P., Reinhardt, E. Geologic Investigation and Optical Dating of the Merritt Island Sand Ridge Sequence 47, (2010). Southeastern Geology, Eastern Florida, USA. 175–190.Google Scholar
Colquhoun, D.J., and Johnson, H.S. Tertiary sea-level fluctuations in South Carolina. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 5, (1968). 105–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DuBar, J.R. Summary of Neogene stratigraphy of southern Florida. Oaks, R.Q., and DuBar, J.R. Post-Miocene Stratigraphy, Central and Southern Atlantic Coast Plain. (1974). Utah State University, Logan, Utah. 206–231.Google Scholar
DuBar, J.R. Quaternary geology of the Gulf of Mexico Coastal Plain — Florida Peninsula. Morrison, R.B. Quaternary nonglacial geology K-2, (1991). Geological Society of America, The Geology of North America, Boulder, Colorado. 595–604.Google Scholar
Force, E.R., and Garnar, T.E. High-angle aeolian crossbedding at Trail Ridge, Florida. Industrial Minerals. (1985). 55–59. (August) Google Scholar
Force, E.R., and Rich, F.J. Geologic evolution of Trail Ridge eolian heavy-mineral sand and underlying peat. Northern Florida: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1499. (1989). (16 pp.)Google Scholar
Healy, H.G., (1975). Terraces and Shorelines of Florida: Florida Department of Natural Resources. Bureau of Geology, Map Series Number 71.Google Scholar
Kane, B.C., (1984). Origin of the Grandin (Plio-Pleistocene) Sands, Western Putnam County. Florida [Masters thesis], Gainesville, University of Florida., 87 pp.Google Scholar
Laurent, M., Falgueres, C., Bahain, J.J., Ropusseau, L., and Van Vliet Lanoe, B. ESR dating of quartz extracted from Quaternary and Neogene sediments: method, potential and actual limits. Quaternary Science Reviews (Quaternary Geochronology) 17, (1998). 1057–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, M., Yin, G., Ding, Y., Cui, Y., Chen, K., Wu, C., and Xu, L. Reliability study on ESR dating of the aluminum center in quartz. Radiation Measurements 41, (2006). 1045–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddox, G.L., Scott, T.M., and Means, G.H. Rucks' Pit Okechobee County, Florida, USA. Southeastern Geological Society Guidebook Number 45. (2005). (24 pp.)Google Scholar
Murray, A.S., and Wintle, A.G. Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose procedure. Radiation Measurements 32, (2000). 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olley, J.M., Pietsch, T., and Roberts, R.G. Optical dating of Holocene sediments from a variety of geomorphic settings using single grains of quartz. Geomorphology 60, (2004). 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirkle, W.A, (1972). Trail Ridge, a relic shoreline feature of Florida and Georgia. [Ph.D. thesis]: Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina., 85 pp.Google Scholar
Pirkle, F.L. Evaluation of possible source regions of Trail Ridge sands. Southeastern Geology 17, (1975). 93–114.Google Scholar
Pirkle, F.L., and Czel, L.J. Marine fossils from region of Trail Ridge. A Georgia–Florida Landform: Southeastern Geology 24, (1983). 31–38.Google Scholar
Pirkle, E.C., and Yoho, W.H. The heavy mineral ore body of Trail Ridge, Florida. Economic Geology 65, (1970). 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, J.R., and Hutton, J.T. Cosmic ray and gamma ray dosimetry for TL and ESR. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements 14, (1988). 223–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randazzo, A.F. The sedimentary platform of Florida: Mesozoic to Cenozoic. Randazzo, A.F., and Jones, D.S. The Geology of Florida: Gainesville. (1997). University Press of Florida, Florida. 39–56.Google Scholar
Rees-Jones, J. Optical dating of young sediments using fine-grain quartz. Ancient TL 13, (1995). 9–14.Google Scholar
Rich, F.J. Palynology and paleoecology of a lignitic peat from Trail Ridge, Florida. Florida Geological Survey Information Circulation No. 100. (1985). (15 pp.)Google Scholar
Riggs, S.R. Paleoceanographic model of Neogene phosphorite deposition, U.S., Atlantic continental margin. Science 223, (1984). 123–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rink, W.J., and Odom, A.L. Natural alpha recoil particle radiation and ionizing radiation sensitivities in quartz detected with EPR: implication for geochronometry. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements 18, (1991). 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rink, W.J., Bartoll, J., Schwarcz, H.P., Shane, P., and Bar-Yosef, O. Testing the reliability of ESR dating of optically exposed buried quartz sediments. Radiation Measurements 42, (2007). 1618–1626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, T.M. The lithostratigraphy of the Hawthorn Group (Miocene) of Florida. Florida Geological Survey Bulletin 59, (1988). (148 pp.)Google Scholar
Scott, T.M. Miocene to Holocene history of Florida. Randazzo, A.F., and Jones, D.S. The Geology of Florida. (1997). University Press of Florida, Gainseville, Florida. 57–67.Google Scholar
Scott, T.M., Campbell, K.M., Rupert, F.R., Arthur, J.D., Green, R.C., Means, G.H., Missimer, T.M., Lloyd, J.M., Yon, J.W., and Duncan, J.G., (2001). Geologic Map of the State of Florida: Florida Geological Survey Map Series 146. 1 plate.Google Scholar
Tiedemann, R., Sarnthein, M., and Shackleton, N.J. Astronomic timescale for the Pliocene Atlantic δ18O and dust flux records of Ocean Drilling Program site 659. Paleoceanography 9, (1994). 619–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tissoux, H., Falgueres, C., Voinchet, P., Toyoda, S., Bahain, J.J., and Despriee, J. Potential use of Ti-center in ESR dating of fluvial sediments. Quaternary Geochronology 2, (2007). 367–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toyoda, S., Voinchet, P., Falgueres, C., Dolo, J.M., and Laurent, M. Bleaching of ESR signals by sunlight: a laboratory experiment for establishing the ESR dating of sediments. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 52, (2000). 1357–1362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voinchet, P., Falgueres, C., Tissoux, H., Bahain, J.-J., Despriee, J., and Pirouelle, F. ESR dating of fluvial quartz: estimate of the minimal distance transport required for getting a maximum optical bleaching. Quaternary Geochronology 2, (2007). 363–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weil, J.A., Bolton, J.R., and Wertz, J.E. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: Elementary Theory and Practical Applications. (1994). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Google Scholar
White, W.A. The geomorphology of the Florida peninsula. Florida Geological Survey Bulletin 51, (1970). (164 pp.)Google Scholar
Winker, C.D., and Howard, J.D. Correlation of tectonically deformed shorelines on the southern Atlantic coastal plain. Geology 5, (1977). 123–127.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yokoyama, Y., Falgueres, C., and Quaegebeur, J.P. ESR dating of quartz from Quaternary sediments: first attempt. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements 10, (1985). 921–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar