Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:01:15.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Fauna and Overall Interpretation of the “Cutting 10” Acheulean Site at Elandsfontein (Hopefield), Southwestern Cape Province, South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Richard G. Klein
Richard G. Klein*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago, 1126 East 59th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637 USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Cutting 10 site at Elandsfontein (Hopefield), southwestern Cape Province, South Africa, is one of only three sites in southern Africa where bones and Acheulean artifacts have been documented together in primary or near primary context and the only such site where the association is in the open air. The Cutting 10 bones belong to a minimum of 15 mammalian species, which together suggest both a mid-Pleistocene age for the site and a vegetational setting in which grasses played a much more important role than they did historically. The absence of evidence for hearths, windbreaks, and other features, the composition of the artifact assemblage, the relatively sparse scatter of bones and artifacts, the relatively high bone to artifact ratio, the species composition of the fauna, and the numbers of different kinds of skeletal elements represented all indicate that the Cutting 10 occurrence was more a butchering site than a campsite. Although people are probably responsible for most of the bones, some of them probably come from animals that were killed by large carnivores or that died naturally.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Quaternary Research , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , July 1978 , pp. 69 - 83
Copyright
University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butzer, K.W., 1973. Re-evaluation of the geology of the Elandsfontein (Hopefield) site, south-western Cape, South Africa. South African Journal of Science. 69, 234-238.Google Scholar
Churcher, C.S., 1970. The fossil Equidae from the Krugersdorp Caves. Annals of the Transvaal Museum. 26, 145-168.Google Scholar
Cooke, C.K., 1963. Report on excavations at Pomongwe and Tshangula Caves, Matopos Hills, Southern Rhodesia. South African Archaeological Bulletin. 18, 73-151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon , H. J., (n.d.).The stratigraphy of the Hopefield fossil site. . Unpublished manuscript. ..Google Scholar
Drennan, M.R., 1953. The Saldanha Skull and its associations. Nature (London). 172, 791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drennan, M.R., 1955. The special features and status of the Saldanha Skull. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 13, 625-634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ewer, R.F., Singer, R., 1956. Fossil Carnivora from Hopefield. Annals of the South African Museum. 42, 335-347.Google Scholar
Freeman, L.G., 1975. Acheulean sites and stratigraphy in Iberia and the Maghreb. Butzer, K.W., Isaac, G.Ll., After the Australopithecines. Mouton, The Hague, 661-744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, L.G., 1978. The analysis of some occupation floor distributions from earlier and middle Paleolithic sites in Spain. Freeman, L.G., Views of the Past. Mouton, The Hague, In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendey, Q.B., 1974a. The Lake Cenozoic Carnivora of the South-Western Cape Province. Annals of the South African Museum. 63, 1-369.Google Scholar
Hendey, Q.B., 1974b. Faunal dating of the Late Cenozoic of southern Africa, with special reference to the Carnivora. Quaternary Research. 4, 149-161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendey, Q.B., Hendey, H., 1968. New Quaternary fossil sites near Swartklip, Cape Province. Annals of the South African Museum. 52, 43-73.Google Scholar
Hooijer, D.A., Singer, R., 1960. Fossil rhinoceroses from Hopefield, South Africa. Zoologische Mededelingen (Rijksmuseum van natuurlijke historie te Leiden). 37, 113-128.Google Scholar
Hooijer, D.A., Singer, R., 1961. The fossil hippopotamus from Hopefield, South Africa. Zoologische Mededelingen (Rijksmuseum van natuurlijke historie te Leiden). 37, 157-165.Google Scholar
Howell, F.C., 1966. Observations on the earlier phases of the European Lower Paleolithic. American Anthropologist. 68, 88-201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inskeep, R.R., Hendey, Q.B., 1966. An interesting association of bones from the Elandsfontein fossil site. Actes du 129e Congrès Panafricain de Préhistoire et de l'Etude du Quaternaire. Museo Arqueológico, Tenerife, 109-124.Google Scholar
Isaac, G.Ll., 1971. The diet of early man: Aspects of archaeological evidence from Lower and Middle Pleisitocene sites in Africa. World Archaeology. 2, 278-298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isaac, G.Ll., 1975. Stratigraphy and cultural patterns in East Africa during the middle ranges of Pleistocene time. Butzer, K.W., Isaac, G.Ll., After the Australopithecines. Mouton, The Hague, 495-542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, G.Ll., 1977 Olorgesailie: Archaeological Studies of a Middle Pleistocene Lake Basin in Kenya. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Google Scholar
Keen, E.N., Singer, R., 1956. Further fossil Suidae from Hopefield. Annals of the South African Museum. 42, 350-360.Google Scholar
Klein, R.G., 1973. Geological antiquity of Rhodesian Man. Nature (London). 244, 311-312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, R.G., 1975a. Middle Stone Age man-animal relationships in southern Africa: Evidence from Die Kelders and Klasies River Mouth. Science. 190, 265-267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, R.G., 1975b. Paleoanthropological implications of the nonarcheological bone assemblage from Swartklip 1, south-western Cape Province, South Africa. Quaternary Research. 5, 275-288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, R.G., 1976a. The mammalian fauna of the Klasies River Mouth sites, southern Cape Province, South Africa. South African Archaeological Bulletin. 31, 75-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, R.G., 1976b. A preliminary report on the Middle Stone Age open-air site of Duinefontein 2 (Melkbosstrand, south-western Cape Province, South Africa). South African Archaeological Bulletin. 31, 12-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, R.G., 1977. The ecology of early man in southern Africa. Science. 197, 115-126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, R.G., 1978. Stone Age predation on large African bovids. Joural of Archaeological Science. in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleindienst, M.R., 1961. Variability within the Late Acheulean assemblage in Eastern Africa. South African Archaeological Bulletin. 62, 35-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mabbutt, J.A., 1956. The physiography and surface geology of the Hopefield fossil site. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. 35, 21-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mabbutt, J.A., 1957. The physical background to the Hopefield discoveries. Clark, J.D., The Proceedings of the Third Pan-African Congress on Prehistory. Chatto and Windhus, London, 68-75.Google Scholar
Maglio, 130.J., 1973. Origin and evolution of the Elephantidae. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society. 63, 1-149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, R.J., 1962 Prehistory of the Transvaal. University of the Witwatersrand Press, Johannesburg. Google Scholar
Mason, R.J., 1967. Prehistory as a science of change—New research in the South African interior. Occasional Papers of the Archaeological Research Unit of the University of the Witwatersrand. 1, 1-19.Google Scholar
Mason, R.J., Dart, R.A., Kitching, J.W., 1958. Bone tools at the Kalkbank Middle Stone Age site and the Makapansgat Australopithecine locality, central Transvaal. South African Archaeological Bulletin. 51, 85-116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, H.D., 1962. Aspects of the Quaternary Geology of the Sandveld with Particular Reference to the Hopefield Fossil Site. Unpublished Honours thesis. University of Cape Town. Google Scholar
Oakley, K.P., 1957. The dating of the Broken Hill, Florisbad, and Saldanha skulls. Clark, J.D., The Proceedings of the Third Pan-African Congress on Prehistory. Chatto and Windhus, London, 76-79.Google Scholar
Perkins, D., Daly, P., 1968. A hunters' village in Neolithic Turkey. Scientific American. 219, 97-106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rightmire, G.P., 1976. Relationships of Middle and Upper Pleistocene hominids from sub-Saharan Africa. Nature (London). 260, 238-240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, C.G., 1974 The Stone Age Archaeology of Southern Africa. Academic Press, New York. Google Scholar
Shipman, P., Phillips, J.E., 1976. On scavenging by hominids and other carnivores. Current Anthropology. 17, 170-172.Google Scholar
Singer, R., 1954. The Saldanha skull from Hopefield, South Africa. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 12, 345-362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, R., 1958. The Rhodesian, Florisbad and Saldanha skulls. von Koenigswald, G.H.E., Neanderthal Centenary. Kemink en Zoon, Utrecht, 52-62.Google Scholar
Singer, R., 1962. Simopithecus from Hopefield, South Africa. Bibliotheca Primatologica. 1, 43-70.Google Scholar
Singer, R., Crawford, J.R., 1957. The significance of the archaeological discoveries at Hopefield, South Africa. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 88, 11-19.Google Scholar
Singer, R., Keen, E.N., 1955. Fossil suiformes from Hopefield. Annals of the South African Museum. 42, 169-179.Google Scholar
Singer, R., Wymer, J.J., 1968. Archaeological investigations at the Saldanha skull site in South Africa. South African Archaeological Bulletin. 25, 63-74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welbourne, R.G., 1971. A Study of Prehistoric Relationships between Environment, Animals and Man at One Earlier Stone Age site, One Middle Stone Age site, and Eight Iron Age sites in the Vaal-Limpopo Basins. Unpublished M. A. Thesis. University of the Witwatersrand. Google Scholar