Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:01:19.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Late Pleistocene Environments of the Central Ukraine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Denis-Didier Rousseau ,
Natalia Gerasimenko ,
Zhanna Matviischina  and
George Kukla
Denis-Didier Rousseau
Affiliation:
Paléoenvironnements et Palynologie, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution (UMR CNRS 5554), Université Montpellier II, case 61, place E. Bataillon, Montpellier Cedex 05, 34095, France Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York, 10964, E-mail: denis@dstu.univ-montp2.fr
Natalia Gerasimenko
Affiliation:
Paleogeography, Institute of Geography of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Volodymyrska, 44, Kyiv, 01034, Ukraine
Zhanna Matviischina
Affiliation:
Paleogeography, Institute of Geography of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Volodymyrska, 44, Kyiv, 01034, Ukraine
George Kukla
Affiliation:
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York, 10964
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Vyazivok loess sequence from the Dnieper Plain, Ukraine, documents regional environmental changes during the late Pleistocene and Holocene. Pedological and palynological analyses and low-field magnetic susceptibility document changes from dense temperate forest during the last interglacial maximum to open, harsh, loess–steppe during the latest Pleistocene. The Vyazivok section overlies hillwash derived from a lower Pleistocene terrace and consists of two stratified soil complexes (Kaydaky and Pryluky; marine isotope stage [MIS] 5 equivalent) separated by a layer of eolian dust (Tyasmyn silt). The lower soils in both complexes formed within forest. These soils are overlain by the Uday (MIS4) and Bug (MIS2) loess units, which are separated by boreal soils of the Vytachiv (MIS3) complex. The coldest conditions within the record occurred in the youngest loess. Holocene soils cap the Bug loess. The Vyazivok section shows remarkable similarities with other classical loess sequences in western Europe, the Czech Republic, and Austria. The Kaydaky, Pryluky, and Vytachiv deposits, correlate with the PKIII, PKII, and PKI soil complexes, respectively, of the Czech Republic. The Tyasmyn and Prylyky silt layers correspond to marker horizons from central Europe.

Keywords

loessUkrainepedologypollenmagnetic susceptibilitylast climatic cycleupper Pleistocene
Type
Research Article
Information
Quaternary Research , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , November 2001 , pp. 349 - 356
Copyright
University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antoine, P, Rousseau, D.D, Lautridou, J.P, and Hatté, C Last interglacial-glacial climatic cycle in loess-paleosol successions of north-western France. Boreas 28, (1999). 551 563.Google Scholar
Antoine, P, Rousseau, D.D, Zöller, L, Lang, A, Munaut, A.V, Hatté, C, and Fontugne, M High-resolution record of the last interglacial-glacial cycle in the loess palaeosol sequences of Nussloch (Rhine Valley-Germany). Quaternary International 76/77, (2001). 211 229.Google Scholar
Bolikhovskaya, N.S Evolutsia lessovo-pochvennoy formatsii Severnoy Evrazii (Evolution of loess-soil formation of Northern Eurasia). (1995). Moscow Univ. Press, Moscow.Google Scholar
Frechen, M, Zander, A, Cilek, V, and Lozek, V Loess chronology of the last interglacial/glacial cycle in Bohemia and Moravia, Czech Republic. Quaternary Science Reviews 18, (1999). 1467 1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenzel, B Zur Pollenanalyse von Lössen. Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart 15, (1964). 5 39.Google Scholar
Gerasimenko, N Paleolandshafty pravoberezhya Kievskogo Pridneprovya v Pleistotsene (Paleoenvironment of the Kyiv Dnieper Region in the Pleistocene). (1988). VINITI, Moscow.Google Scholar
Gerasimenko, N Ukrainsky botanichny zhurnal 45, (1988). 43 48.Google Scholar
Grichuk, V.P “Osnovnye etapy razvitia rastitel'nosti yugo-zapada Russkoy ravniny v pozdnem Pleistotsene (Main Stages of Vegetational History of the South-west of the Russian Plain during the Late Pleistocene).”. Grichuk, V.P Palinologia Pleistotsena. (1972). Nauka, Moscow. 9 53.Google Scholar
Klima, B, Kukla, J, Lozek, V, and DeVries, H Stratigraphie des Pleistozäns und Alter des palaeolithischen Rastplatzes in der Ziegelei von Dolni Vestonice (Unter-Wisternitz). Anthropozoikum 11, (1962). 93 145.Google Scholar
Kubiena, W.L Zur Micromorphologie, Systematik und Entwicklung der rezenten und fossilen Lossboden. Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart 7, (1956). 102 112.Google Scholar
Kukla, J Lithologische Leithorizonte der tschechoslowakischen Lössprofile. Vestnik Ustredniho Ustava Geologickeho XXXVI, (1961). 369 372.Google Scholar
Kukla, G Loess stratigraphy of Central Europe. Butzer, K.W, and Isaac, G.L After the Australopithecines. (1975). Mouton, The Hague. 99 188.Google Scholar
Kukla, G Pleistocene land-sea correlations. 1. Europe. Earth-Science Review 13, (1977). 307 374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukla, G, and Briskin, M The age of the 4/5 isotopic stage boundary on land and in the oceans. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 42, (1983). 35 45.Google Scholar
Kukla, G, and Cilek, V Plio-Pleistocene megacycle: Record of climate and tectonics. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 120, (1996). 171 194.Google Scholar
Krokos, V.I Instruktsia do vyvchennya chetvertynnyh pokladiv Ukrainy (Directions on studies of Quaternary deposits in Ukraine). Chetvertynny Period 3, (1932). 17 55.Google Scholar
Lozek, V Mittelund JungPleistozäne Löss-serien in der Tschechoslowakei und ihre Bedeutung für die Löss-stratigraphie Mitteleuropas. VI INQUA Congress Warsaw 1961 4, (1964). 525 549.Google Scholar
Lozek, V Le loess et les formations assimilées: Corrélation entre l'Europe centrale et la France par la faune de mollusques. Études sur le Quaternaire dans le monde,. (1969). VIII Congrès INQUA, Paris. p. 597–606.Google Scholar
Martinson, D.G, Pisias, N.G, Hays, J.D, Imbrie, J, Moore, T.C, and Shackleton, N.J Age dating and the orbital theory of the ice ages: Development of a high-resolution 0 to 300,000 year chronostratigraphy. Quaternary Research 27, (1987). 1 29.Google Scholar
Matviishina, Z Micromorphologia pleistocenovych pochv Ukrainy. (1982). Naukova dumka, Kiev.Google Scholar
Musson, F.M, and Wintle, A.G Luminescence dating of the loess profile at Dolni Vestonice, Czech Republic. Quaternary Science Reviews 13, (1994). 411 416.Google Scholar
Oches, E.A, McCoy, W.D, and Gneisser, D.N Aminostratigraphic correlation of loess/paleosol sequences across Europe. Goodfriend, G, Collins, M, Fogel, M, Macko, S, and Wehmiller, J.F Perspectives in Amino Acid and Protein Geochemistry. (2000). Oxford Univ. Press, New York. 331 348.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D.D Paleoclimatology of the Achenheim series (middle and upper Pleistocene, Alsace, France). A malacological analysis. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 59, (1987). 293 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, D.D Climatic transfer function from Quaternary molluscs in European loess deposits. Quaternary Research 36, (1991). 195 209.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D.D, and Kukla, G Abrupt paleomonsoon decline at the S1/L1 boundary in China?. Global and Planetary Change 26, (2000). 189 198.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D.D, Kukla, G, Zöller, L, and Hradilova, J Early Weichselian dust storm layer at Achenheim in Alsace, France. Boreas 27, (1998). 200 207.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D.D, Zöller, L, and Valet, J.P Climatic variations in the Upper Pleistocene loess sequence at Achenheim (Alsace, France). Analysis of the magnetic susceptibility and thermoluminescence chronology. Quaternary Research 49, (1998). 255 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelkoplyas, V.N, Gozhik, P.F, Khristoforova, T.F, Matsuy, V.M, Chugunny, Y.G, Palatnaya, N.N, Shevchenko, A.I, Morozov, G.V, and Lysenko, O.B Antropogenovye otlozhenia Ukrainy. (1986). Naukova dumka, Kiev.Google Scholar
Sirenko, N.A, and Turlo, S.I Razvitie pochv i rastitel'nosti Ukrainy v pliotsene i pleistocene. (1986). Naukova dumka, Kiev.Google Scholar
Smolikova, L Fossilni pudy ve sprasovych seriich (Fossil soils in loess series). Kvarter Brnenske kotliny. Stranska skala IV. Studia Geographica 80, (1982). Google Scholar
Urban, B Palynology of central European loess-soil sequences. Pecsi, M Lithology and Stratigraphy of Loess and Paleosols. (1984). Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest. 229 248.Google Scholar
Veklitch, M. F. (1968). Stratigrafia lessovoy formatsii Ukrainy i sosednih stran. (Stratigraphy of Loess Series of Ukraine and Adjacent Areas), Naukova dumka, Kiev. [In Russian] Google Scholar
Veklitch, M.F Pleistocene loesses and fossil soils of the Ukraine. Acta Geologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 22, (1979). 35 62.Google Scholar
Veklitch, M.F Paleoetapnost' i stratotipy pochvennyh formatsiy Ukrainy. (1982). Naukova dumka, Kiev.Google Scholar
Veklitch, M.F Stratigraficheskaya shema chetvertichnyh otlozheniy Ukrainy. (1993). State Committee for Geology of Ukraine, Kiev.Google Scholar
Veklitch, M.F, Artyushenko, A.T, Sirenko, N.A, Dubnyak, V.A, Mel'nichuk, I.V, and Parishkura, S.I Opornye geologicheskie razrezy antropogena Ukrainy. (1967). Naukova dumka, Kiev.Google Scholar
Veklitch, M.F, Sirenko, N.A, Volkov, N.G, Shovkoplyas, I.G, Dubnyak, V.A, Korniets, N.L, Lavrushin, Y.A, Matviishina, Z.N, Mel'nichuk, I.V, Nagirhy, V.N, Peredery, V.I, Solovitsky, V.N, Turlo, S.I, Chugunny, Y.G, Barshchevsky, N.E, Vozgrin, B.D, Gerasimenko, N.P, Gladkikh, M.I, and Kolomiets, G.D Quaternary geology of the Dnieper area. International Geological Congress XXVII Session, (1984). 64 81.Google Scholar
Velichko, A.A Prirodny protses v pleistotsene. (1973). Moscow, Nauka.Google Scholar
Zöller, L, Oches, E.A, and McCoy, W Towards a revised chronostratigraphy of loess in Austria with respect to key sections in the Czech Republic and in Hungary. Quaternary Geochronology 13, (1994). 465 472.Google Scholar