Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T02:07:31.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New aspects of the interpretation of the loess magnetic fabric, Cérna Valley succession, Hungary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Balazs Bradák-Hayashi ,
Tamás Biró ,
Erzsébet Horváth ,
Tamás Végh  and
Gábor Csillag
Balazs Bradák-Hayashi
Affiliation:
Department of Planetology, Kobe University, 1-1, Rokkodai-cho, Nada-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 657-8501, Japan Geographical Institute, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences (HAS), 45 Budaörsi St., H-1112, Budapest, Hungary
Tamás Biró
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Geography, Eötvös Loránd University, 1/C Pázmány P. St, H-1117, Budapest, Hungary
Erzsébet Horváth
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Geography, Eötvös Loránd University, 1/C Pázmány P. St, H-1117, Budapest, Hungary
Tamás Végh
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Geography, Eötvös Loránd University, 1/C Pázmány P. St, H-1117, Budapest, Hungary
Gábor Csillag
Affiliation:
Geological and Geophysical Institute of Hungary, 14 Stefánia St., H-1143, Budapest, Hungary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) is a frequently applied method in sedimentology, especially in the determination of the orientation of transport processes. We present an analysis of magnetic fabric (MF) studies on loess. New aspects of fabric development reveal: i) The deposition of the aeolian sediments was controlled by gravity, low-energy transport and local geomorphology, hence no clarified wind direction can be defined. ii) The influence of phyllosilicates is also significant among the magnetic components. iii) While the primary MF is relatively well-defined, the secondary MF is influenced by several processes. The analysis of stereoplots combined with the q—β diagram and photostatistics showed encouraging results during the characterization of various secondary MF such as redeposited MF and pedogenic fabric. iv) Changes in processes from aeolian to water-lain deposition and the increasing transportation energy were reflected by the connection between AMS and observed micro-scale sedimentary features. v) A relationship was obvious between the degree of pedogenesis and the transformation of sedimentary MF into a vertical MF typical for paleosols. vi) The significant role of very fine grained magnetite on the formation of inverse MF could not be excluded.

Keywords

MicrofabricDirectional fabricPhotostatisticsImage analysisVisible grain fabricMicromorphologyMagnetic fabric
Type
Research Article
Information
Quaternary Research , Volume 86 , Issue 3 , November 2016 , pp. 348 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © University of Washington 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balsley, J.R., Buddington, A.F., 1960. Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy and fabric of some adirondack granites and orthogneisses. American Journal of Science 258, 6–20.Google Scholar
Begét, J.E., Stone, B.D., Hawkins, B.D., 1990. Paleoclimatic forcing of magnetic susceptibility variations in Alaskan loess during the late Quaternary. Geology 18, 40–43.Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, D.S., 1965. Orientation of mineral lineation along the flow direction in rocks. Tectonophysics 3, 29–33.Google Scholar
Bradák, B., 2009. Application of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) for the determination of paleo-wind directions during the accumulation period of Bag Tephra, Hungary. Quaternary International 198, 77–84.Google Scholar
Bradák, B., Kovács, J., 2014. Quaternary surface processes indicated by the magnetic fabric of undisturbed, reworked and fine-layered loess in Hungary. Quaternary International 319, 76–87.Google Scholar
Bradák, B., Thamó-Bozsó, E., Kovács, J., Márton, E., Csillag, G., Horváth, E., 2011. Characteristics of Pleistocene climate cycles identified in Cerna Valley loessepaleosol section (Vertesacsa, Hungary). Quaternary International 234, 86–97.Google Scholar
Budai, T., Császár, G., Csillag, G., Fodor, L., Gál, N., Kercsmár, Zs., Kordos, L., Pálfalvi, S., Selmeczi, I., 2008. Geology of the Vertes Hills. Explanatory Book to the Geological Map of the Vertes Hills (1: 50 000), p. 368. Budapest.Google Scholar
Bullock, P., Fedoroff, N., Jongerius, A., Stoops, G., Tursina, T., 1985. Handbook for Soil Thin Section Description. Waine Research Publications, Wolderhampton, p. 152.Google Scholar
Davis, J.C., 1986. Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology, second ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, E., Billard, A., Vliet-Lanoe, B.V., Lautridou, J.-P., Cremaschi, M., 1988. Loess and paleoenvironment some results of a European joint programme of research. Journal of Quaternary Science 3, 147–169 Google Scholar
Ge, J., Guo, Z., Zhao, D., Zhang, Y., Wang, T., Yi, L., Deng, C., 2014. Spatial variations in paleowind direction during the last glacial period in north China reconstructed from variations in the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of loess deposits. Tectonophysics 629, 353–361.Google Scholar
Granar, L., 1958. Magnetic measurements on Swedish varved sediments. Arkiv Geofysik 3, 1–40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Haase, D., Fink, J., Haase, G., Ruske, R., Pécsi, M., Richter, H., Altermann, M., Jäger, K.-D., 2007. Loess in Europedits spatial distribution based on a European loess map, scale 1:2,500,000. Quaternary Science Reviews 26, 1301–1312 Google Scholar
Hrouda, F., 1982. Magnetic anisotropy of rock and its application in geology and geophysics. Geophysical Survey 5, 37–82.Google Scholar
Hrouda, F., Jelinek, V., 1990. Resolution of ferromagnetic and paramagnetic anisotropies in rock, using combined low-field and high-field measurements. Geophysical Journal International 103, 75–84.Google Scholar
Hus, J.J., 2003. The magnetic fabric of some loess/paleosol deposits. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 28, 689–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, R.A., 1999. Micromorphology of loess-paleosol sequences: a record of paleoenvironmental change. Catena 35, 179–196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, R.A., Zarate, M., Toms, P., King, M., Sanabria, J., Arguello, G., 2006. Late Quaternary paleosol, stratigraphy and landscape evolution in the Northern Pampa, Argentina. Quaternary Research 66, 119–132 Google Scholar
Lagroix, F., Banerjee, S.K., 2002. Paleowind direction from the magnetic fabric of loess profile in central Alaska. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 195, 99–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagroix, F., Banerjee, S.K., 2004. Cryptic post-depositional reworking in aeolian sediments revealed by the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 224, 453–459.Google Scholar
Liu, W., Sun, J., 2012. High-resolution anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility record in the central Chinese Loess Plateau and its paleoenvironment implications. Science China, Earth Sciences 55, 488–494.Google Scholar
Magaldi, D., Tallini, M., 2000. A micromorphological index of soil development for the Quaternary geology research. Catena 41, 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martín-Hernández, F., Hirt, A.M., 2003. The anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility in biotite, muscovite and chlorite single crystals. Tectonophysics 367, 13–28 Google Scholar
Márton, E., Bradák, B., Rauch-Włodarska, M., Tokarski, A.K., 2010. Magnetic anisotropy of clayey and silty members of tertiary flysch from the Silesian and Skole Nappes (outher Carpathians). Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 54, 121–134.Google Scholar
Matasova, G., Kazansky, A.Y., 2004. Magnetic Properties and Magnetic Fabrics of Pleistocene Loess/Palaeosol Deposits along West-Central Siberian Transect and Their Palaeoclimatic Implications, vol. 238. Geological Society, London, pp. 145–173. Special Publications 2004.Google Scholar
Matasova, G., Petrovský, E., Jordanova, N., Zykina, V., Kapička, A., 2001. Magnetic study of late Pleistocene loess/palaeosol sections from Siberia: palaeoenvironmental implications. Geophysical Journal International 147, 367–380.Google Scholar
Nawrocki, J., Polechońska, O., Boguckij, A., Łanczont, M., 2006. Palaeowind directions recorded in the youngest loess in Poland and western Ukraine as derived from anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility measurements. Boreas 35, 266–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, A.I., 1966. The effect of depositional slopes on the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of laboratory deposited sands. Journal of Geology 74, 856–867.Google Scholar
Rees, A.I., 1968. The production of preferred orientation in a concentrated dispersion of elongated and flattened grains. Journal of Geology 76, 457–465.Google Scholar
Rees, A.I., 1971. The magnetic fabric of sedimentary rock deposited on slope. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 41 (1), 307–309.Google Scholar
Rees, A.I., 1979. The orientation of grains in a sheared dispersion. Tectonophysics 55, 275–287.Google Scholar
Rochette, P., 1987. Magnetic susceptibility of the rock matrix related to the magnetic fabric studies. Journal of Structural Geology 9, 1015–1020 Google Scholar
Rochette, P., 1988. Inverse magnetic fabric in carbonate-bearing rocks. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 90, 229–237.Google Scholar
Sebe, K., Csillag, G., Ruszkiczay-Rüdiger, Zs., Fodor, L., Thamo-Bozso, E., Müller, P., Braucher, R., 2011. Wind erosion under cold climate: a Pleistocene periglacial mega-yardang system in central Europe (western Pannonian basin, Hungary). Geomorphology 134, 470–482.Google Scholar
Stacey, F.D., Joplin, G., Lindsay, J., 1960. Magnetic anisotropy and fabric of some foliated rock from S.E. Australia. Geofisica Pura e Applicata 47, 30–40 Google Scholar
In: Hrouda, F. (Ed.), 1982: Magnetic anisotropy of rock and its application in geology and geophysics. Geophysical Survey 5, 37–82.Google Scholar
Stoops, G., Marcelino, V., Mees, F., 2010. Interpretation of Micro-morphological Features of Soils and Regoliths. Elsevier, p. 720.Google Scholar
Sun, J.M., Ding, Z.L., Liu, T.S., 1995. Primary application of magnetic fabric mensuration of loess and paleosols for reconstruction of winter monsoon direction. Chinese Science Bulletin 40 (21), 1976–1978 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
in: Tang, Y., Jia, J., Xia, X. 2003. Record of properties in Quaternary loess and its paleoclimatic significance: a brief review. Quaternary International 108, 33–50.Google Scholar
Taira, A., 1989. Magnetic fabrics and depositional processes. In: Taira, A., Masuda, F. (Eds.), Sedimentary Facies in the Active Plate Margin. Terra Scientific Publishing Company, Tokyo, pp. 43–77.Google Scholar
Tarling, D.H., Hrouda, F., 1993. The Magnetic Anisotropy of Rock. Chapman — Hall, London, Glasgow, New York, Tokyo, Melbourne, Madras, p. 217.Google Scholar
Tauxe, L., 1998. Paleomagnetic Principles and Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, p. 299.Google Scholar
Taylor, S.N., Lagroix, F., 2015. Magnetic anisotropy reveals the depositional and post-depositional history of a loess-paleosol sequence at Nussloch (Germany): AMS of Nussloch loess-paleosol sequence. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/.Google Scholar
Terhorst, B., Kühn, P., Dammc, B., Hambach, U., Meyer-Heintze, S., Sedov, S., 2014. Paleoenvironmental fluctuations as recorded in the loess-paleosol sequence of the Upper Paleolithic site Krems-Wachtberg. Quaternary International 351, 67–82 Google Scholar
Terhorst, B., Sedov, S., Sprafke, T., Peticzka, R., Meyer-Heintze, S., Kühn, P., Solleiro Rebolledo, E., 2015. Austrian MIS 3/2 loessepalaeosol recordsdkey sites along a westeeast transect. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 418, 43–56.Google Scholar
Thamó-Bozsó, E., Csillag, G., Fodor, L., Müller, P., Nagy, A., 2010. OSL-dating the Quaternary landscape evolution in the Vórtes Hills forelands (Hungary). Quaternary Geochronology 5, 120–124 Google Scholar
Thistlewood, L., Sun, J.A., 1991. Paleomagnetic and mineral magnetic study of loess sequence at Liujiapo, Xi’an, China. Journal of Quaternary Science 6, 13–26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsatskin, A., Heller, F., Hailwood, E.A., Gendler, T.S., Hus, J., Montgomery, P., Sartori, M., Virina, E.I., 1998. Pedosedimentary division, rock magnetism and chronology of the loess/palaeosol sequence at Roxolany (Ukraine). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 143, 111–133.Google Scholar
von Rad, U., 1970. Comparison between “magnetic” and sedimentary fabric in graded and cross-laminated sand layers, Southern California. Geologische Rundschau 60, 331–354.Google Scholar
Wang, R., Løvlie, R., 2010. Subaerial and subaqueous deposition of loess: experimental assessment of detrital remanent magnetization in Chinese loess. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 298, 394–404.Google Scholar
Wu, H.B., Chen, F.H., Wang, J.M., 1998. A study on the relationship between magnetic anisotropy of modern eolian sediments and wind direction. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (ACTA GeophysicaSinica) 41, 811–817 Google Scholar
(in Chinese) in: Tang, Y., Jia, J., Xia, X., 2003. Record of properties in Quaternary loess and its paleoclimatic significance: a brief review. Quaternary International 108, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeeden, C., Hambach, U., Handel, M., 2015. Loess magnetic fabric of the Krems-Wachtberg archaeological site. Quaternary International 372, 188–194 Google Scholar
Zhang, R., Kravchinsky, V.A., Zhu, R., Leping, Y., 2010. Paleomonsoon route reconstruction along a W-E transect in the Chinese Loess Plateau using the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility: summer monsoon model. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 299, 436–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, R., Liu, Q., Jackson, M.J., 2004. Paleoenvironmental significance of the magnetic fabric of Chinese loess-paleosols since the last interglacial (<130 ka). Earth and Planetary Science Letters 221, 55–69.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bradák-Hayashi et al. Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Bradák-Hayashi et al. Supplementary Material(File)
File 21.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Bradák-Hayashi et al. Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Bradák-Hayashi et al. Supplementary Material(File)
File 22.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Bradák-Hayashi et al. Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Bradák-Hayashi et al. Supplementary Material(File)
File 157 KB
Supplementary material: File

Bradák-Hayashi et al. Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Bradák-Hayashi et al. Supplementary Material(File)
File 103.9 KB