Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:52:08.057Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transfer functions Under no-Analog Conditions: Experiments With Indian Ocean Planktonic Foraminifera

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

William Halsey Hutson
William Halsey Hutson*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912 USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper documents and investigates an important source of inaccuracy when paleoecological equations calibrated on modern biological data are applied downcore: fossil assemblages for which there are no modern analogs. Algebraic experiments with five calibration techniques are used to evaluate the sensitivity of the methods with respect to no-analog conditions. The five techniques are: species regression; principal-components regression [e.g., Imbrie, J., and Kipp, N. G. (1971). In “The Late Cenozoic Ages,” 71–181]; distance-index regression [Hecht, A. D. (1973). Micropaleontology 19 , 68–77]; diversity-index regression (Williams, D. F., and Johnson, W. C. (1975). Quaternary Research 5 , 237–250]; weighted-average method [Jones, J. I. (1964). Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. of Wisconsin]. The experiments indicate that the four regression techniques extrapolate under no-analog conditions, yielding erroneous estimates. The weighted-average technique, however, does not extrapolate under no-analog conditions and consequently is more accurate than the other techniques. Methods for recognizing no-analog conditions downcore are discussed, and ways to minimize inaccuracy are suggested. Using several equations based on different calibration techniques is recommended. Divergent estimates suggest that no-analog conditions occur and that estimates are unreliable. The value determined by the weighted-average technique, however, may well be the most accurate.

Type
Research Article
Information
Quaternary Research , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , November 1977 , pp. 355 - 367
Copyright
University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bé, A. W. H., and Hutson, W. H. (in press). Ecologic and biogeographic patterns of planktonic foraminif era1 life and fossil assemblages. Micropa/eontology 23.Google Scholar
Berger, W.H., (1968). Planktonic Foraminifera: Selective solution and paleoclimatic interpretation. Bé, A. W. H., and Hutson, W. H. (in press). Ecologic and biogeographic patterns of planktonic formainiferal life and fossil assemblages. Micropaleontology Deepsea Research. 15, 31-43.Google Scholar
Berger, W.H., (1969). Ecologic patterns of living planktonic Foraminifera. Deep-sea Research. 16, 1-24.Google Scholar
Berger, W.H., Gardner, J.69., (1975). On the determination of Pleistocene temperatures from planktonic Foraminifera. Journal of Foraminiferal Research. 5, 102-113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecht, A.D., (1973). A model for determining Pleistocene paleotemperatures from planktonic foraminiferal assemblages. Micropaleontology. 19, 68-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutson, W.H., (1976). The ecology and paleoecology of Indian Ocean planktonic Formainifera. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Brown University. Google Scholar
Hutson, W.H., Lott, L., (1972). Plankton-sediment relationships: A quantitative model and its application to Indian Ocean planktonic Foraminifera. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. 4, 549-550.Google Scholar
Imbrie, J., Kipp, N.G., (1971). A new micropaleontological method for paleoclimatology: Application to a Late Pleistocene Caribbean core. Turekian, K.K., The Late Cenozoic Glacial Ages. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, 71-181.Google Scholar
Imbrie, J., van Donk, J., Kipp, N.G., (1973). Paleoclimatic investigation of a Late Pleistocene Caribbean deep-sea core: Comparison of isotopic and faunal methods. Quaternary Research. 3, 10-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J.I., (1964). Distribution of living planktonic Foraminifera of the West Indies and adjacent waters. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University of Wisconsin. Google Scholar
Kellogg, T.B., (1975). Late Quaternary climatic changes in the Norwegian and Greenland Seas. Weller, G., Bowling, S.A., Climate of the Arctic. Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska, 3-36.Google Scholar
Kipp, N.G., (1976). New transfer function for estimating past sea-surface conditions from sea-bed distributions of planktonic foraminiferal assemblages in the North Atlantic. Investigation of Late Quaternary Paleoecology and Paleoclimatology. Geological Society of America Memoir 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luz, B., (1973). Stratigraphic and paleoclimatologic analysis of Late Pleistocene tropical South Pacific cores. Quaternary Research. 3, 56-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynts, G.W., Judd, J.B., (1971). Late Pleistocene paleotemperatures at Tongue of the Ocean, Bahamas. Science. 171, 1143-1144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, F.L., Berger, W.H., (1971). Faunal and solution patterns of planktonic Foraminifera in surface sediments of the South Pacific. Deep-sea Research. 18, 73-707.Google Scholar
Sachs, H.M., (1973). North Pacific radiolarian assemblages and their relationship to oceanographic parameters. Quaternary Research. 3, 73-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sancetta, C.A., Imbrie, J., Kipp, N.G., Ruddiman, W.F., McIntyre, A., (1973). Climatic record in North Atlantic deep-sea core V2382: Comparison of the last and present interglacials based on quantitative time series. Quaternary Research. 2, 363-367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D.F., Johnson, W.C., (1975). Diversity of Recent planktonic Foraminifera in the southern Indian Ocean and Late Pleistocene paleotemperatures. Quaternary Research. 5, 237-250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar