Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wjfd9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T22:53:58.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discontinuity in the Fijian Archaeological Record Supported by a Bayesian Radiocarbon Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2016

David V Burley  and
Kevan Edinborough
David V Burley*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
Kevan Edinborough
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31-34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, United Kingdom. Email: k.edinborough@ucl.ac.uk
*
Corresponding author. Email: burley@sfu.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Fijian archaeological record is segmented into a series of phases based on distinctive transformations in ceramic forms. Interpretations of the mid-sequence (∼1500–1300 cal BP) transition between the Fijian Plainware phase and the Navatu phase are contentious, with alternative explanations of population replacement versus internal processes of culture change. We present and analyze a series of Fijian Plainware and Navatu phase AMS radiocarbon dates acquired from superimposed but stratigraphically separated occupation floors at the Sigatoka Sand Dunes site on the southwest coast of Viti Levu. Employing an OxCal Bayesian sequential model, we seek to date the temporal span for each occupation as well as the interval of time occurring between occupation floors. The latter is estimated to be 0–43 calendar years at 2σ probability. The magnitude of ceramic and other differences between the Fijian Plainware and Navatu phase occupations at Sigatoka is substantive. We conclude that the abruptness of this change can be explained only by exogenous replacement at the Sigatoka site.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , 2014 , pp. 295 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bayliss, A. 2009. Rolling out revolution: using radiocarbon dating in archaeology. Radiocarbon 51(1):138–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, S. 2002. Lapita: A View from the East. Auckland: New Zealand Archaeological Association Monograph 24.Google Scholar
Birks, L. 1973. Archaeological Excavations at Sigatoka Dune Site, Fiji. Suva: Bulletin of the Fiji Museum 1.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–60.Google Scholar
Burley, DV. 2003. Dynamic landscapes and episodic occupations: archaeological interpretation and implications in the prehistory of the Sigatoka Sand Dunes. In: Sand, C, editor. Pacific Archaeology: Assessments and Prospects. Noumea: Le Cahiers de l'Archeologie en Nouvelle Caledonie 15. p 327–35.Google Scholar
Burley, DV. 2005. Mid-sequence archaeology at the Sigatoka Sand Dunes with interpretive implications for Fijian and Oceanic culture history. Asian Perspectives 44(2):320–48.Google Scholar
Burley, DV. 2010. Archaeological surveys of Kadavu, Vanua Levu and Viti Levu – 2009 project [unpublished report]. Suva: Fiji Museum.Google Scholar
Burley, DV. 2013. Fijian polygenesis and the Melanesian/Polynesian divide. Current Anthropology 35(4):436–62.Google Scholar
Burley, DV, Balenaivalu, J. 2012. Kadavu archaeology: first insights from a preliminary survey. Domodomo 25(1–2):13–36.Google Scholar
Burley, DV, Taché, K, Purser, M, Naucabalavu, J. 2011. An archaeology of salt production in Fiji. Antiquity 85(327):187–200.Google Scholar
Clark, GR. 2009. Post Lapita ceramic change in Fiji. In: Clark, G, Anderson, A, editors. The Early Prehistory of Fiji. Terra Australis 31. Canberra: Australian National University. p 307–20.Google Scholar
Collard, M, Edinborough, K, Shennan, SJ, Thomas, MG. 2010. Radiocarbon evidence indicates that migrants introduced farming to Britain. Journal of Archaeological Science 37(4):866–70.Google Scholar
Dickinson, WR, Burley, DV, Nunn, PD, Anderson, A, Hope, G, de Biran, A, Burke, C, Matararaba, S. 1998. Geomorphic and archaeological landscapes of the Sigatoka Dune Site, Viti Levu, Fiji: interdisciplinary investigations. Asian Perspectives 37(1):1–31.Google Scholar
Frost, EL. 1979. Fiji. In: Jennings, JD, editor. The Prehistory of Polynesia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. p 61–81.Google Scholar
Gifford, EW. 1951. Archaeological Excavations in Fiji. Anthropological Records 13(3). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Green, RC. 1963. A suggested revision of the Fijian sequence. Journal of the Polynesian Society 72:235–53.Google Scholar
Horrocks, M. 2011. Plant microfossil analysis of pot sherds from Sigatoka Sand Dunes, Viti Levu, Fiji. [unpublished report]. On file with DV Burley, Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Hunt, TL. 1986. Conceptual and substantive issues in Fijian prehistory. In: Kirch, PV, editor. Island Societies: Archaeological Approaches to Evolution and Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 20–32.Google Scholar
Marshall, M, Crosby, A, Matararaba, S, Wood, S. 2000. Sigatoka: The Shifting Sands of Fijian Prehistory. Southampton: Department of Archaeology Monograph 1.Google Scholar
McCormac, FG, Hogg, AG, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Higham, TF, Reimer, PJ. 2004. SHCal04 Southern Hemisphere calibration, 0–11.0 kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46(3):1087–92.Google Scholar
Rechtman, R. 1992. The evolution of sociopolitical complexity in the Fiji Islands [PhD dissertation]. Los Angeles: Department of Anthropology, University of California.Google Scholar
Riede, F, Edinborough, K. 2012. Bayesian radiocarbon models for the cultural transition during the Allerød in southern Scandinavia. Journal of Archaeological Science 39(3):744–56.Google Scholar
Rieth, TM, Hunt, TL, Lipo, C, Wilmshurst, JM. 2011. The 13th century Polynesian colonization of Hawai'i Island. Journal of Archaeological Science 38(10):2740–9.Google Scholar
Sand, C, Valentin, F, Sorovi-Vunidilo, T, Bole, J, Ouetcho, A, Matararaba, S, Naucabalavu, J, Baret, D, Lagarde, L. 1999 Cikobia-i-Ra: Archaeology of a Fijian Island. Noumea: Les Cahiers de l'Archéologie en Nouvelle-Calédonie, Volume 9.Google Scholar
Whittle, A, Healy, F, Bayliss, A. 2011. Gathering Time: Dating the Early Neolithic Enclosures of Southern Britain and Ireland. Oxford: Oxbow Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilmshurst, JM, Hunt, TL, Lipo, CP, Anderson, AJ. 2011. High-precision radiocarbon dating shows recent and rapid colonization of East Polynesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 108(5):1815–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed