Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:24:43.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Status Report on the Sample Preparation Laboratory for Radiocarbon Dating at the New Bucharest Roams Center

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2018

Tiberiu B Sava*
Affiliation:
RoAMS Laboratory, Horia Hulubei National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering Reactorului 30, 077125, Măgurele-Bucharest, Romania
Corina A Simion
Affiliation:
RoAMS Laboratory, Horia Hulubei National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering Reactorului 30, 077125, Măgurele-Bucharest, Romania
Oana Gâza
Affiliation:
RoAMS Laboratory, Horia Hulubei National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering Reactorului 30, 077125, Măgurele-Bucharest, Romania
Iuliana M Stanciu
Affiliation:
RoAMS Laboratory, Horia Hulubei National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering Reactorului 30, 077125, Măgurele-Bucharest, Romania
Doru G Păceșilă
Affiliation:
RoAMS Laboratory, Horia Hulubei National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering Reactorului 30, 077125, Măgurele-Bucharest, Romania
Gabriela O Sava
Affiliation:
RoAMS Laboratory, Horia Hulubei National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering Reactorului 30, 077125, Măgurele-Bucharest, Romania
Lukas Wacker
Affiliation:
Labor für Ionenstrahlphysik, ETH Zürich Otto Stern Weg 5, 8093, Zürich, Switzerland
Bianca Ștefan
Affiliation:
RoAMS Laboratory, Horia Hulubei National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering Reactorului 30, 077125, Măgurele-Bucharest, Romania
Vasile D Moșu
Affiliation:
RoAMS Laboratory, Horia Hulubei National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering Reactorului 30, 077125, Măgurele-Bucharest, Romania
Dan G Ghiță
Affiliation:
RoAMS Laboratory, Horia Hulubei National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering Reactorului 30, 077125, Măgurele-Bucharest, Romania
Alexandru Vasiliu
Affiliation:
RoAMS Laboratory, Horia Hulubei National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering Reactorului 30, 077125, Măgurele-Bucharest, Romania
*
*Corresponding author. Email: tiberiu.sava@nipne.ro.

Abstract

The accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) center at Horia Hulubei National Institute for R&D in Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest, is based on the latest-generation 1 MV Tandetron® accelerator, produced by High Voltage Engineering Europa (HVEE), The Netherlands. The AMS center became fully functional at the start of 2013, and at the end of 2015 the laboratory established the RoAMS international code and it was added to the list of AMS laboratories maintained by Radiocarbon journal. An important aspect in the establishment of a new AMS laboratory is the declaration and documentation of the adopted protocols and to demonstrate the reliability and reproducibility of the measurements in comparison to internationally recognized reference materials. In this paper, we present the dating results on the Sixth International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (SIRI) samples that were pretreated, graphitized, and measured in our laboratory. The newly developed sample preparation laboratory can handle sample materials as (1) organic materials, (2) wood, (3) bones, and (4) carbonates. The results of our measurements are in very good agreement with the SIRI consensus values and confirm the reliability of our sample preparation laboratory and also the good performance of the HVEE AMS system. The blank levels for the SIRI materials are 0.277±0.045/0.333±0.046 percent modern carbon (pMC) for wood samples, 0.441±0.038 pMC for bone collagen, and 0.239±0.030 pMC for carbonate materials, considering an average mass of 1 mg sample graphite.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© 2018 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, TA, Nelson, D, Vogel, J, Southon, J. 1988. Improved collagen extraction by modified Longin method. Radiocarbon 30(2):171177.Google Scholar
DeNiro, MJ. 1985. Postmortem preservation and alteration of in vivo bone collagen isotope ratios in relation to palaeodietary reconstruction. Nature 317(6040):806809.Google Scholar
Fülöp, RH, Heinze, S, John, S, Rethemeyer, J. 2013. Ultrafiltration of bone samples is neither the problem nor the solution. Radiocarbon 55(2):491500.Google Scholar
Hajdas, I, Michczyński, A, Bonani, G, Wacker, L, Furrer, H. 2009. Dating Bones near the limit of the radiocarbon dating method: study case mammoth from Niederweningen, ZH Switzerland. Radiocarbon 51(2):675680.Google Scholar
Hajdas, I, Cristi, C, Bonani, G, Maurer, M. 2014. Textiles and radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 56(2):637643.Google Scholar
IAEA. RS IAEA-C1 to IAEA-C9 Rev.01. 2014. Reference sheet for quality control materials.Google Scholar
Jull, AJT, Burr, GS, Beck, JW, Hodgins, GWL, Biddulph, DL, Gann, J, Hatheway, AL, Lange, TE, Lifton, NA. 2006. Application of accelerator mass spectrometry to environmental and paleoclimate studies at the University of Arizona. Radioactivity in the Environment 8:323.Google Scholar
Klein, MG, Mous, DJW, Gottdang, A. 2006. A compact 1MV multi-element AMS system, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 249(1–2):764767.Google Scholar
Longin, R. 1971. New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating. Nature 230(5292):241242.Google Scholar
Klein, MG, van Staveren, HJ, Mous, DJW, Gottdang, A. 2007. Performance of the compact HVE 1 MV multi-element AMS system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259:184187.Google Scholar
Němec, M, Wacker, L, Hajdas, I, Gäggeler, H. 2010. Alternative methods for cellulose preparation for AMS measurement. Radiocarbon 52(3):13581370.Google Scholar
NIST SRM 4990C. 1983. International Standard Reference Material for Contemporary Carbon-14.Google Scholar
Scott, EM. 2003. The Third International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (TIRI) and the Fourth International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (FIRI). Radiocarbon 45(2):135408.Google Scholar
Scott, EM, Cook, G, Naysmith, P. 2010. The fifth international radiocarbon intercomparison (VIRI): An assessment of laboratory performance in stage 3. Radiocarbon 53(2-3):859865.Google Scholar
Scott, EM, Naysmith, P and Cook, GT. 2017, Should archaeologists care about 14C inter-comparison? Why? A summary report on SIRI. Radiocarbon 59(5):15891596.Google Scholar
Stan-Sion, C, Enăchescu, M, Petre, AR, Simion, CA, Călinescu, CI, Ghiță, DG. 2015. A new and compact system at the AMS laboratory in Bucharest. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 361:105109.Google Scholar
Stan-Sion, C, Enăchescu, M. 2017. AMS with light nuclei at small accelerators. AIP Conference Proceedings 1852:060004.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, H. 1977. Discussion: Reporting of 14C Data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355363.Google Scholar
Wacker, L, Němec, M, Bourquin, J. 2010a. A revolutionary graphitization system: Fully automated, compact and simple. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7–8):931934.Google Scholar
Wacker, L, Christl, M, Synal, H-A. 2010b. Bats: A new tool for AMS data reduction. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7–8):976979.Google Scholar
Wacker, L, Fülöp, RH, Hajdas, I, Molnar, M, Rethemeyer, J. 2013. A novel approach to process carbonate samples for radiocarbon measurements with helium carrier gas. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 294:214217.Google Scholar