Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T07:47:37.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Advances in the Radiocarbon Analysis of Carbon dioxide at the NERC Radiocarbon Facility (East Kilbride) using Molecular sieve Cartridges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2019

M H Garnett Open the ORCID record for M H Garnett [Opens in a new window] ,
Josephine-Anne Newton  and
P L Ascough
M H Garnett*
Affiliation:
NERC Radiocarbon Facility, Rankine Avenue, East Kilbride, G75 0QF, UK
Josephine-Anne Newton
Affiliation:
NERC Radiocarbon Facility, Rankine Avenue, East Kilbride, G75 0QF, UK
P L Ascough
Affiliation:
NERC Radiocarbon Facility, Rankine Avenue, East Kilbride, G75 0QF, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: mark.garnett@glasgow.ac.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Radiocarbon (14C) analysis of carbon dioxide (CO2) provides unique information on the age, turnover and source of this important greenhouse gas, raising the prospect of novel scientific investigations into a range of natural and anthropogenic processes. To achieve these measurements, cartridges containing zeolite molecular sieves are a reliable and convenient method for collecting CO2 samples. At the NERC Radiocarbon Facility (East Kilbride) we have been refining our molecular sieve methods for over twenty years to achieve high-quality, reproducible and precise measurements. At the same time, we have been developing novel field sampling methods to expand the possibilities in collecting gas from the atmosphere, soil respiration and aquatic environments. Here, we present our latest improvements to cartridge design and procedures. We provide the results of tests used to verify the methods using known 14C content standards, demonstrating reliability for sample volumes of 3 mL CO2 (STP; 1.6 mg C) collected in cartridges that had been prepared at least three months earlier. We also report the results of quality assurance standards processed over the last two years, with results for 22 out of 23 international 14C standards being within measurement uncertainty of consensus values. We describe our latest automated procedures for the preparation of cartridges prior to use.

Keywords

automationcarbon dioxidemolecular sieveradiocarbonZeolite
Type
Conference Paper
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 61 , Issue 6: Radiocarbon 2018 Conference Proceedings Trondheim, Norway, June 17–22, 2018 Part 2 of 2 , December 2019 , pp. 1855 - 1865
Copyright
© 2019 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 23rd International Radiocarbon Conference, Trondheim, Norway, 17–22 June, 2018

References

REFERENCES

Boaretto, E, Bryant, C, Carmi, I, Cook, G, Gulliksen, S, Harkness, D, Heinemeier, J, McClure, J, McGee, E, Naysmith, P, Possnert, G, Scott, M, van der Plicht, H, van Strydonck, M. 2002. Summary findings of the fourth international radiocarbon intercomparison (FIRI)(1998–2001). Journal of Quaternary Science 17(7):633–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bol, RA, Harkness, DD. 1995. The use of zeolite molecular sieves for trapping low concentrations of CO2 from environmental atmospheres. Radiocarbon 37(1):643–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breck, DW. 1974. Zeolite molecular sieves: structure, chemistry and use. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Campeau, A, Bishop, K, Billett, MF, Garnett, MH, Laudon, H, Leach, JA, Nilsson, MB, Öquist, MG, Wallin, MB. 2017. Aquatic export of young dissolved and gaseous carbon from a pristine boreal fen: implications for peat carbon stock stability. Global Change Biology 23(12):5523–5536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garnett, MH, Dinsmore, KJ, Billett, MF. 2012. Annual variability in the radiocarbon age and source of dissolved CO2 in a peatland stream. Science of the Total Environment 427–428:277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnett, MH, Hartley, IP. 2010. A passive sampling method for radiocarbon analysis of atmospheric CO2 using molecular sieve. Atmospheric Environment 44(7):877–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnett, MH, Murray, C. 2013. Processing of CO2 samples collected using zeolite molecular sieve for 14C analysis at the NERC Radiocarbon Facility (East Kilbride, UK). Radiocarbon 55(2–3):410–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, H, Willis, E. 1964. Cambridge University natural radiocarbon measurements VI. Radiocarbon 6:116–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulliksen, S, Scott, M. 1995. Report of the TIRI workshop, Saturday 13 August, 1994. Radiocarbon 37(2):820–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hämäläinen, K, Fritze, H, Jungner, H, Karhu, K, Oinonen, M, Sonninen, E, Spetz, P, Tuomi, M, Vanhala, P, Liski, J. 2010. Molecular sieve sampling of CO2 from decomposition of soil organic matter for AMS radiocarbon measurements. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7):1067–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, SML, Garnett, MH, Fallick, AE, Rowland, AP, Ostle, NJ. 2005. Carbon dioxide capture using a zeolite molecular sieve sampling system for isotopic studies (13C and 14C) of respiration. Radiocarbon 47(3):441–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC. 2013. Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, I, Hesshaimer, V. 2000. Radiocarbon—a unique tracer of global carbon cycle dynamics. Radiocarbon 42(1):69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newsham, KK, Garnett, MH, Robinson, CH, Cox, F. 2018. Discrete taxa of saprotrophic fungi respire different ages of carbon from Antarctic soils. Scientific Reports 8(1):7866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palonen, V. 2015. A portable molecular-sieve-based CO2 sampling system for radiocarbon measurements. Review of Scientific Instruments 86(12):125101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slota, PJ, Jull, AT, Linick, TW, Toolin, LJ. 1987. Preparation of small samples for 14C accelerator targets by catalytic reduction of CO. Radiocarbon 29(2):303–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, JC, Xu, X, Fahrni, SM, Lupascu, M, Czimczik, CI. 2015. Developing a passive trap for diffusive atmospheric 14CO2 sampling. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 361:632–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, TN, Garnett, MH, Ward, SE, Oakley, S, Bardgett, RD, Ostle, NJ. 2016. Vascular plants promote ancient peatland carbon loss with climate warming. Global Change Biology 22(5):1880–1889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wotte, A, Wischhöfer, P, Wacker, L, Rethemeyer, J. 2017a. 14CO2 analysis of soil gas: Evaluation of sample size limits and sampling devices. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 413:51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wotte, A, Wordell-Dietrich, P, Wacker, L, Don, A, Rethemeyer, J. 2017b. 14CO2 processing using an improved and robust molecular sieve cartridge. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 400:65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar