Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:16:05.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Age and Thermal Stability of Particulate Organic Matter Fractions Indicate the Presence of Black Carbon in Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2016

Jens Leifeld*
Affiliation:
Climate/Air Pollution Group, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland
Maria Heiling
Affiliation:
Soil and Water Management & Crop Nutrition Subprogram, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, IAEA, Austria
Irka Hajdas
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, ETH, Otto Stern Weg 5, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
*
Corresponding author. Email: jcns.leifeld@agroscope.admin.ch.

Abstract

Black carbon (BC) from incomplete combustion of organic materials is abundant in many soils. Its age is often higher than that of thermally unaltered soil organic carbon (SOC) owing to the presence of BC from fossil sources or to a high recalcitrance against microbial decomposition compared to that of plant residues. For a meaningful application of radiocarbon as an indicator for soil carbon age and turnover, the relative contribution of BC needs to be quantified, but BC is difficult to separate physically from soil. However, BC is thermally more stable than SOC, and hence thermal stability may provide a quantitative BC indicator. Here, we analyzed 30 light particulate organic carbon (POC) soil fractions for their thermal stability and for their 14C signature. POC is particularly sensitive to “contamination” with BC, because it is obtained by combined size and density fractionation. A steady-state “bomb” 14C model was used to derive mean POC ages. Soils from four sample sets, each consisting of six to eight individual POC samples and representing different field sites and POC types, were analyzed. Samples from one of the sets were virtually BC free, and their mean POC ages ranged from 60 to 100 yr. The 14C signature of samples from the other three sets indicated the presence of very old carbon, with mean POC ages of several hundred and up to 3500 yr. Two indicators for thermal stability—(1) the amount of heat released at temperatures >450°C and (2) the amount of heat released at 500°C (the latter representing the peak temperature of heat released from charcoal isolated from soil)—correlated both significantly and nonlinearly with POC age, indicating that samples with high BC content were older than those with low BC content. It can be concluded that at an individual site with increasing abundance of BC, both the age and the thermal stability of POC increase. However, thermal stability proved to be a reliable predictor for BC in only one sample set, whereas thermal signals of the other two BC-containing sample sets were not significantly different from those of BC-free samples. Thermal stability thus gives no unequivocal indication for the presence of BC in POC across different sites.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarwal, T. Bucheli, TD. 2011. Adaptation, validation and application of the chemo-thermal oxidation method to quantify black carbon in soils. Environmental Pollution 159:532–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baisden, WT, Amundson, R, Cook, AC, Brenner, DL. 2002. Turnover and storage of C and N in five density fractions from California annual grassland surface soils. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16(4):GB001822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carcaillet, C. 2001. Soil particles reworking evidences by AMS 14C dating of charcoal. Earth and Planetary Sciences 332(1):21–8.Google Scholar
Felber, R, Leifeld, J, Horák, J, Neftel, A. 2014. N2O emission reduction with greenwaste biochar: comparison of laboratory and field experiment. European Journal of Soil Science 65:128–38.Google Scholar
Glaser, B, Balashov, E, Haumaier, L, Guggenberger, G, Zech, W. 2000. Black carbon in density fractions of anthropogenic soils of the Brazilian Amazon region. Organic Geochemistry 31(7–8):669–78.Google Scholar
Hammes, K, Schmidt, MWI, Smernik, RJ. 2007. Comparison of quantification methods to measure fire-derived (black/elemental) carbon in soils and sediments using reference materials from soil, water, sediment and the atmosphere. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 21(3):GB3016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harkness, DD, Harrison, AF, Bacon, PJ. 1986. The temporal distribution of ‘bomb’ 14C in a forest soil. Radiocarbon 28(2A):328–37.Google Scholar
Harvey, OR, Kuo, L-J, Zimmerman, AR, Louchouarn, P, Amonette, JE, Herbert, BE. 2012. An index-based approach to assessing recalcitrance and soil carbon sequestration potential of engineered black carbons (biochars). Environmental Science & Technology 46(3):1415–21.Google Scholar
Jenkinson, DS, Poulton, PR, Bryant, C. 2008. The turnover of organic carbon in subsoils. Part 1. Natural and bomb radiocarbon in soil profiles from the Rothamsted long-term field experiments. European Journal of Soil Science 59(2):391–9.Google Scholar
Krull, ES, Swanston, CW, Skjemstad, JO, McGowan, JA. 2006. Importance of charcoal in determining the age and chemistry of organic carbon in surface soils. Journal of Geophysical Research 111:G04001.Google Scholar
Lehmann, J, Gaunt, J, Rondon, M. 2006. Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems - a review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11:403–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leifeld, J. 2007. Thermal stability of black carbon characterised by oxidative differential scanning calorimetry. Organic Geochemistry 38(1):112–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leifeld, J. 2008. Biased 14C-derived organic carbon turnover estimates following black carbon input to soil: an exploration with RothC. Biogeochemistry 88(3):205–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leifeld, J, Franko, U, Schulz, E. 2006. Thermal stability responses of soil organic matter to long-term fertilization practices. Biogeosciences 3(3):371–4Google Scholar
Leifeld, J, Zimmermann, M, Fuhrer, J, Conen, F. 2009. Storage and turnover of carbon in grassland soils along an elevation gradient in the Swiss Alps. Global Change Biology 15(3):668–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, I, Kromer, B. 2004. The tropospheric (CO2)-14C level in mid-latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere (1959–2003). Radiocarbon 46(3):1261–72.Google Scholar
Levin, I, Kromer, B, Hammer, S. 2013. Atmospheric delta (CO2)-14C trend in Western European background air from 2000 to 2012. Tellus B 65:20092.Google Scholar
Liang, B, Lehmann, J, Solomon, D, Sohi, S, Thies, JE, Skjemstad, JO, Luizao, FJ, Engelhard, MH, Neves, EG, Wirick, S. 2008. Stability of biomass-derived black carbon in soils. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 72(24):6069–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maharaj, S, Barton, CD, Karatkanasis, TAD, Rowe, HD, Rimmer, SM. 2007. Distinguishing “new” from “old” organic carbon on reclaimed coal mine sites using thermogravimetry: I. Method development. Soil Science 172(4):292301.Google Scholar
Marschner, B, Brodowski, S, Dreves, A, Gleixner, G, Gude, A, Grootes, PM, Wiesenberg, GLB. 2008. How relevant is recalcitrance for the stabilization of organic matter in soils? Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 171(1):91110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plante, AF, Fernandez, JM, Leifeld, J. 2009. Application of thermal analysis techniques in soil science. Geoderma 153(1–2):110.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatté, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine 13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):1869–87.Google Scholar
Rethemeyer, J, Kramer, C, Gleixner, G, John, B, Yamashita, T, Flessa, H, Andersen, N, Nadeau, M-J, Grootes, PM. 2005. Transformation of organic matter in agricultural soils: radiocarbon concentration versus soil depth. Geoderma 128(1–2):94105.Google Scholar
Rovira, P, Kurz-Besson, C, Couteaux, MM, Vallejo, VR. 2008. Changes in litter properties during decomposition: a study by differential thermogravimetry and scanning calorimetry. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 40(1):172–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, MWI, Knicker, H, Hatcher, PG, Kögel-Knabner, I. 1996. Impact of brown coal dust on the organic matter in particle-size fractions of a Mollisol. Organic Geochemistry 25(1–2):2939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, MWI, Noack, AG. 2000. Black carbon in soils and sediments: analysis, distribution, implications, and current challenges. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 14(3):777–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, MWI, Skjemstad, JO, Jager, C. 2002. Carbon isotope geochemistry and nanomorphology of soil black carbon: black chernozemic soils in central Europe originate from ancient biomass burning. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16(4):1123.Google Scholar
Six, J, Elliott, ET, Paustian, K. 1999. Aggregate and soil organic matter dynamics under conventional and no-tillage systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63(5):1350–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steier, P, Dellinger, F, Kutschera, W, Priller, A, Rom, W, Wild, EM. 2004. Pushing the precision limit of 14C AMS. Radiocarbon 46(1):516.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–63.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ, Braziunas, TF. 1998. High-precision radiocarbon age calibration for terrestrial and marine samples. Radiocarbon 40(3):1127–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Synal, H-A, Stocker, M, Suter, M. 2007. MICADAS: a new compact radiocarbon AMS system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259:713.Google Scholar
World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB). 2006. 2nd edition. International Society of Soil Science, International Soil Reference and Information Centre, and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar