Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:25:24.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bayesian Modeling of an Early Bronze Age Cemetery at Armadale, Isle of Skye, Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2016

Anthony M Krus  and
Mary Peteranna
Anthony M Krus*
Affiliation:
SUERC, Scottish Enterprise Technology Park, Rankine Avenue, East Kilbride, G75 0QF, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Mary Peteranna
Affiliation:
AOC Archaeology Group, Inverness Office, Bank Street, Cromarty, Ross-shire, IV11 8YE, Scotland, United Kingdom.
*
*Corresponding author. Email: tony.krus@glasgow.ac.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Excavations from 2009–2010 in Armadale, Isle of Skye, Scotland, encountered a burial site with seven cists, pits containing cremation burials, a kerbed cairn, and a small stone and post circle. Twenty-one radiocarbon measurements were taken from single entities of wood charcoal, carbonized residue on pottery, and cremated human bone. A site chronology has been constructed using a Bayesian approach that considers the stratigraphic contexts and feature formation processes. The site was host to thousands of years of discontinuous human activity beginning with little understood Mesolithic and Neolithic components. Modeling estimates that mortuary activity at the site began in the Early Bronze Age in 2220–1985 cal BC (95% probability) and to have ended in 1880–1660 cal BC (95% probability). The span of activity during this burial component is estimated to be 140–520 yr (95% probability) in the primary Bayesian model and 50–470 yr (95% probability) in an alternative model. These modeling results demonstrate that human burial at Armadale was an infrequent event and further suggest that the memory of the location and social role of Armadale as a burial ground persisted throughout much of the Early Bronze Age.

Keywords

Bayesian modelingScotlandBronze Age
Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 693 - 708
Copyright
© 2016 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armit, I. 2005. Celtic Scotland: Iron Age Scotland in its European Context. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Bayliss, A. 2009. Rolling out revolution: using radiocarbon dating in archaeology. Radiocarbon 51(1):123–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayliss, A Bronk Ramsey, C, van der Plicht, J, Whittle, A. 2007. Bradshaw and Bayes: towards a timetable for the Neolithic. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 17(S1):1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayliss, A, van der Plicht, J, Bronk Ramsey, C, McCormac, G, Healy, F, Whittle, A. 2011. Towards generational time-scales: the quantitative interpretation of archaeological chronologies. In: Whittle A, Healy F, Bayliss A, editors. Gathering Time: Dating the Early Neolithic Enclosures of Southern Britain and Ireland. Oxford: Oxbow Books. p 17–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 2003. The transition of time. In: Van Dyke RM, Alcock SE, editors. Archaeologies of Memory. Chichester: Wiley. p 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, M. 1984. Ritual and prestige in the prehistory of Wessex c. 2,200–1,400 BC: a new dimension to the archaeological evidence. In: Miller D, Tilley C, editors. Ideology, Power and Prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995. Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program. Radiocarbon 37(2):425–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1998. Probability and dating. Radiocarbon 40(1):461–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001. Development of the radiocarbon calibration program. Radiocarbon 43(2A):355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, CE, Kenworthy, JB, Litton, CD, Smith, AFM. 1991. Combining archaeological and radiocarbon information: a Bayesian approach to calibration. Antiquity 65(249):808–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, CE, Cavanagh, WG, Litton, CD. 1996. Bayesian Approach to Interpreting Archaeological Data. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. 1994. The living, the dead and the ancestors: time, life cycles and mortuary domain in later European prehistory. In: Davies J, editor. Ritual and Remembrance: Responses to Death in Human Societies. Sheffield: Sheffield University Press. p 40–85.Google Scholar
Cooney, G. 2014. Role of cremation in mortuary practices in the Irish Neolithic. In: Kuijt I, Quinn CP, Cooney G, editors. Transformation by Fire: The Archaeology of Cremation in Cultural Context. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. p 189–206.Google Scholar
Dunbar, E, Cook, GT, Naysmith, P, Tripney, BG, Xu, S. 2016. AMS 14C dating at the Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (SUERC) Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory. Radiocarbon 58(1):9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrow, D, Meadows, J, Evans, C, Tabor, J. 2014. Dating the dead: a high-resolution radiocarbon chronology of burial within an Early Bronze Age barrow cemetery at Over, Cambridgeshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 80:207–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garwood, P. 2007. Before the hills in order stood: chronology, time and history in the interpretation of Early Bronze Age round barrows. In: Last J, editor. Beyond the Grave: New Perspectives on Barrows. Oxford: Oxbow Books. p 30–52.Google Scholar
Gosden, C, Lock, G. 1998. Prehistoric histories. World Archaeology 30:2–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggarty, A. 1991. Machrie Moor, Arran: recent excavations at two stone circles. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 121:51–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, WD, Kenney, J. 2015. Multiple Bayesian modelling approaches to a suite of radiocarbon dates from ovens excavated at Ysgol yr Hendre, Caernarfon, North Wales. Quaternary Geochronology 25:75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higginbottom, G, Smith, AGK, Tonner, P. 2013. A recreation of visual engagement and the revelation of world views in Bronze Age Scotland. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22(2):584–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtorf, CJ. 1998. The life-histories of megaliths in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany). World Archaeology 30:23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, JD. 2010. Making the huaca: memory and praxis in prehispanic far northern Peru. Journal of Social Archaeology 10:398–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naysmith, P, Cook, G, Freeman, S, Scott, EM, Anderson, R, Dunbar, E, Muir, G, Dougans, A, Wilcken, K, Schnabel, C, Russell, N, Ascough, P, Maden, C. 2010. 14C AMS at SUERC: improving QA data from the 5MV tandem AMS and 250kV SSAMS. Radiocarbon 52(2):263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, G. 2006. Neolithic Scotland: Timber, Stone, Earth and Fire. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peteranna, M. 2011. Excavation of a Bronze Age Burial Site at Pier Road, Armadale, Isle of Skye: Interim Report. Cromarty, Scotland: Ross and Cromarty Archaeological Services.Google Scholar
Piggott, S. 1949. The excavations at Cairnpapple Hill, West Lothian 1947–8. Antiquity 23(89):32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitts, M. 2000. Hengeworld. London: Random House.Google Scholar
Quinn, CP. 2015. Returning and reuse: diachronic perspectives on multi-component cemeteries and mortuary politics at Middle Neolithic and Early Bronze Age Tara, Ireland. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 37:1–18.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatte, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):1869–1887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, AJ. 2013. The afterlife of monuments in the English Peak District: the evidence of Early Bronze Age burials. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 32(1):39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowlands, M. 1993. The role of memory in the transmission of culture. World Archaeology 25:141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saville, A. 2011. Struck lithic artefacts [unpublished report]. Edinburgh: National Museums Scotland.Google Scholar
Scott, EM. 2003. The Third International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (TIRI) and the Fourth International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (FIRI) 1990–2002: results, analysis, and conclusions. Radiocarbon 45(2):135–408.Google Scholar
Scott, JG. 1988–1989. The stone circles at Temple Wood, Kilmartin, Argyll. Glasgow Archaeological Journal 15:53–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, A. 2004. Going round in circles? Understanding the Irish Grooved Ware ‘complex’ in its wider context. In: Roche H, Grogan E, Coles J, Raftery B, editors. From Megaliths to Metal. Essays in Honour of George Eogan. Oxford: Oxbow Books. p 26–37.Google Scholar
Sheridan, A. 2011a. Pottery from the Early Bronze Age cemetery at Armadale, Skye [unpublished report]. Edinburgh: National Museums Scotland.Google Scholar
Sheridan, A. 2011b. The wristguard fragment from Cist 4, Armadale [unpublished report]. Edinburgh: National Museums Scotland.Google Scholar
Simpson, DDA. 1968. Food vessels: associations and chronology. In: Coles JM, Simpson DDA, editors. Studies in Ancient Europe: Essays Presented to Stuart Piggott. Leicester: Leicester University Press. p 197–211.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Kra, RS. 1986. Editorial comment. Radiocarbon 28(2B):ii.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ. 1986. A computer program for radiocarbon age calibration. Radiocarbon 28(2B):1022–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ. 1993. Extended 14C data base and revised CALIB 3.0 14C calibration program. Radiocarbon 35(1):215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, IJ, Richards, C. 1984. The decline of ritual authority and the introduction of Beakers into Britain. In: Bradley R, Gardiner J, editors. Neolithic Studies: A Review of Some Current Research, BAR British Archaeological Report 133. Oxford: Archaeopress. p 67–84.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. 1994. A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths and Monuments. Oxford: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Vandeputte, K, Moens, L, Dams, R. 1996. Improved sealed-tube combustion of organic samples to CO2 for stable isotope analysis, radiocarbon dating and percent carbon determinations. Analytical Letters 29(15):215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, A, Barclay, A, Bayliss, A, McFadyen, L, Schulting, R, Wysocki, M. 2007. Building for the dead: events, processes and changing world-views from the thirty-eighth to the thirty-fourth centuries cal. BC in southern Britain. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 17(S1):123–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, A, Healy, F, Bayliss, A. editors. 2011. Gathering Time: Dating the Early Neolithic Enclosures of Southern Britain and Ireland. Oxford: Oxbow Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar