Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:34:05.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CAN THE 14C PRODUCTION IN 1055 CE BE AFFECTED BY SN1054?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2020

F Terrasi Open the ORCID record for F Terrasi [Opens in a new window] ,
F Marzaioli Open the ORCID record for F Marzaioli [Opens in a new window] ,
R Buompane ,
I Passariello ,
G Porzio ,
M Capano ,
S Helama ,
M Oinonen Open the ORCID record for M Oinonen [Opens in a new window] ,
P Nöjd  and
J Uusitalo
...Show all authors
F Terrasi*
Affiliation:
CIRCE, Department of Mathematics and Physics, Campania University “L. Vanvitelli”, Caserta, and INFN Napoli, Italy INNOVA SCaRL, Pozzuoli (NA), Italy
F Marzaioli
Affiliation:
CIRCE, Department of Mathematics and Physics, Campania University “L. Vanvitelli”, Caserta, and INFN Napoli, Italy INNOVA SCaRL, Pozzuoli (NA), Italy
R Buompane
Affiliation:
CIRCE, Department of Mathematics and Physics, Campania University “L. Vanvitelli”, Caserta, and INFN Napoli, Italy INNOVA SCaRL, Pozzuoli (NA), Italy
I Passariello
Affiliation:
INNOVA SCaRL, Pozzuoli (NA), Italy
G Porzio
Affiliation:
CIRCE, Department of Mathematics and Physics, Campania University “L. Vanvitelli”, Caserta, and INFN Napoli, Italy INNOVA SCaRL, Pozzuoli (NA), Italy
M Capano
Affiliation:
CEREGE, Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, IRD, INRA, Collège de France, Technopôle de l’Arbois, Aix-en-Provence, France
S Helama
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute Finland, Rovaniemi, Finland
M Oinonen
Affiliation:
Finnish Museum of Natural History–LUOMUS, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
P Nöjd
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute Finland, Espoo, Finland
J Uusitalo
Affiliation:
Finnish Museum of Natural History–LUOMUS, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
A J T Jull
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ85721, USA University of Arizona AMS Laboratory, Tucson, AZ85721, USA Hertelendi Laboratory of Environmental Studies, Isotope Climatology and Environmental Research Centre (ICER), Institute for Nuclear Research, Debrecen4026, Hungary
I P Panyushkina
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ85721, USA
C Baisan
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ85721, USA
M Molnar
Affiliation:
Hertelendi Laboratory of Environmental Studies, Isotope Climatology and Environmental Research Centre (ICER), Institute for Nuclear Research, Debrecen4026, Hungary
T Varga
Affiliation:
Hertelendi Laboratory of Environmental Studies, Isotope Climatology and Environmental Research Centre (ICER), Institute for Nuclear Research, Debrecen4026, Hungary
G Kovaltsov
Affiliation:
A.F. Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia
S Poluianov
Affiliation:
Space Climate Research Unit and Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
I Usoskin
Affiliation:
Space Climate Research Unit and Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
*
*Corresponding author. Email: filippo.terrasi@unicampania.it.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Annually resolved radiocarbon (14C) measurements on tree rings led to the discovery of abrupt variations in 14C production attributed to large solar flares. We present new results of annual and subannual 14C fluctuations in tree rings from a middle-latitude sequoia (California) and a high-latitude pine (Finland), analyzed for the period 1030–1080 CE, to trace a possible impact of the Crab supernova explosion, occurring during the Oort minimum of solar activity. Our results indicate an increase of Δ14C around 1054/55 CE, which we estimate is higher in magnitude than the cyclic variability due to solar activity at a 2σ significance level. The net signal appears to be synchronized in the studied locations. Several sources of this event are possible including γ-rays from the Crab supernova, an unusually weak solar minimum or a solar energetic particle incident. More data are needed to provide more insight into the origin of this 14C event.

Keywords

radiocarbon AMSsupernovatree rings
Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 62 , Issue 5 , October 2020 , pp. 1403 - 1418
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2020 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beer, J, McCracken, K, von Steiger, R. 2012. Cosmogenic radionuclides: Theory and applications in the terrestrial and space environments. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14651-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berezinskii, VS, Bulanov, SV, Dogiel, VA, Ginzburg, VL, Ptuskin, VS. 1990. Astrophysics of cosmic rays. Amsterdam: North-Holland. ISBN 0-444-88641-9. doi: 10.1002/asna.2113120620.Google Scholar
Brown, PM, Hughes, MK, Baisan, CH, Swetnam, TW, Caprio, C. 1992. Giant sequoia ring-width chronologies from the central Sierra Nevada, California. Tree-Ring Bulletin 52: 1–14.Google Scholar
Büntgen, U, et al. 2018. Tree rings reveal globally coherent signature of cosmogenic radiocarbon events in 774 and 993 CE. Nature Communications 9:3605. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06036-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damon, PE, Kaimei, D, Kocharov, GE, Mikheeva, IB, Peristykh, AN. 1995. Radiocarbon production by the gamma-ray component of supernova explosions. Radiocarbon 37(2):599–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dee, MW, Pope, B, Miles, D, Manning, S, Miyake, F. 2016. Supernovae and single-year anomalies in the atmospheric radiocarbon record. Radiocarbon 59(2):293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donahue, DJ, Linik, TW, Jull, AJT. 1990. Isotope ratio and background corrections for accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon measurements. Radiocarbon 32(2):135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eronen, M, Zetterberg, P, Briffa, KR, Lindholm, M, Meriläinen, J, Timonen, M. 2002. The supra-long Scots pine tree-ring record for Finnish Lapland: Part 1, chronology construction and initial inferences. The Holocene 12:673–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güttler, D, Wacker, L, Kromer, B, Friedrich, M, Synal, H-A. 2013. Evidence of 11-year solar cycles in tree rings from 1010 to 1110 AD—progress on high precision AMS measurements. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 294:459–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güttler, D, et al. 2015. Rapid increase in cosmogenic 14C in AD 775 measured in New Zealand kauri trees indicates short-lived increase in 14C production spanning both hemispheres. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 411:290–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambaryan, VV, Neuhäuser, R. 2013. A galactic short gamma-ray burst as cause for the 14C peak in AD 774/5. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 430:32–36. doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helama, S, et al. 2008. Finnish supra-long tree-ring chronology extended to 5634 BC. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift 62:271–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helama, S, et al. 2015. Age-related trends in subfossil tree-ring δ13C data. Chemical Geology 416:28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jull, AJT, Panyushkina, I, Miyake, F, Masuda, K. 2018. More rapid 14C excursions in the tree-ring record: A record of different kind of solar activity at about 800 BC? Radiocarbon 60(4):1237–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laumer, W, et al. 2009. A novel approach for the homogenization of cellulose to use micro-amounts for stable isotope analyses. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 23: 1934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lingenfelter, RE, Ramaty, R. 1970. Astrophysical and geophysical variations in C-14 production. In: Olsson, IU, editor. Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell. p. 513–535.Google Scholar
Marzaioli, F, et al. 2008. Zinc reduction as an alternative method for accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon dating: Process optimization at CIRCE. Radiocarbon 50(1):139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayall, NU. 1939. The Crab Nebula, a probable supernova. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Leaflets 3:145.Google Scholar
Mekhaldi, F, Muscheler, F, Adolphi, F, Aldahan, A, Beer, J, McConnell, JR, Possnert, G, Sigl, M, Svensson, A, Synal, HA, Welten, KC, Woodruff, TE. 2015. Multiradionuclide evidence for the solar origin of the cosmic-ray events of AD 774/5 and 993/4. Nature Communications 6:8611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menjo, H, Miyahara, H, Kuwana, K, Masuda, K, Muraki, Y, Nakamura, T. 2005. Possibility of the detection of past supernova explosion by radiocarbon measurement. International Cosmic Ray Conference 2:357.Google Scholar
Miyake, F, Nagaya, K, Masuda, K, Nakamura, T. 2012. A signature of cosmic-ray increase in AD 774–775 from tree rings in Japan. Nature 486:240–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyake, F, Masuda, K, Nakamura, T. 2013. Another rapid event in the carbon-14 content of tree rings. Nature Communications 4:1748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyake, F, et al. 2017. Large 14C excursion in 5480 BC indicates an abnormal sun in the mid-Holocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114:881–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molnar, M, et al. 2013. Status report of the new AMS 14C sample preparation lab of the Hertelendi Laboratory of Environmental Studies (Debrecen, Hungary). Radiocarbon 55(2):665–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Hare, P, Mekhaldi, F, Adolphi, F, Raisbeck, G, Aldahan, A, Anderberg, E, Beer, J, Christl, M, Fahrni, S, Synal, H-A, Park, J, Possnert, G, Southon, J, Bard, E, Team, ASTER, Muscheler, R. 2019. Multiradionuclide evidence for an extreme solar proton event around 2,610 B.P. (∼660 BC). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116: 5961–5966. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1815725116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J, Southon, J, Fahrni, S, Creasman, PP, Mewaldt, R. 2017. Relationship between solar activity and Δ14C peaks in AD 775, AD 994, and 660 BC. Radiocarbon 59(4):1147–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlov, AK, et al. 2013. AD 775 pulse of cosmogenic radionuclides production as imprint of a Galactic gamma-ray burst. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 435:2878–2884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, C, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatté, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):1869–1887. doi: 10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, FR, Green, DA. 2003. Was the supernova of AD 1054 reported in European history? Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage 6:46–52.Google Scholar
Stephenson, FR. 2015. Astronomical evidence relating to the observed 14C increases in A.D. 774–5 and 993–4 as determined from tree rings. Advances in Space Research 55:1537–1545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sukhodolov et al. 2017. Atmospheric impacts of the strongest known solar particle storm of 775 AD. Science Reports 7:45257.Google Scholar
Terrasi, F, et al. 2008. High precision 14C AMS at CIRCE. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268:2221–2224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usoskin, IG, et al. 2013. The AD775 cosmic event revisited: The Sun is to blame. Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters 552:L3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usoskin, I. 2017. A history of solar activity over millennia. Living Reviews in Solar Physics 14:3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uusitalo, J, et al. 2018. Solar superstorm of AD 774 recorded subannually by Arctic tree rings. Nature Communications 9:3495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wacker, L, Christl, M, Synal, A. 2010). Bats: A new tool for AMS data reduction. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268:976–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, FY, Yu, H, Zou, YC, Dai, ZG, Cheng, KS. 2017. A rapid cosmic-ray increase in BC 3372–3371 from ancient buried tree rings in China. Nature Communications 8:1487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, H, Chevalier, R.A. 2015. Evolution of the Crab Nebula in a low-energy supernova. Astrophysical Journal 806:153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar