Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:41:59.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Riparian Plants Fix CO2 Lost by Evasion from Surface Waters? An Investigation Using Carbon Isotopes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

M H Garnett  and
M F Billett
M H Garnett*
Affiliation:
NERC Radiocarbon Laboratory, Rankine Avenue, Scottish Enterprise Technology Park, East Kilbride, G75 0QF, United Kingdom
M F Billett
Affiliation:
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Edinburgh Research Station, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0QB, United Kingdom. Email: mbill@ceh.ac.uk
*
Corresponding author. Email: M.Garnett@nercrcl.gla.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Rivers and streams in many parts of the world contain high concentrations of dissolved carbon dioxide, which is lost to the atmosphere by evasion (outgassing). Recent methodological advances now enable the carbon isotopic composition of this evaded CO2 to be measured directly, with early results from peatland streams showing it to be depleted in 13C relative to the atmosphere. The first direct measurements of the radiocarbon age of evaded CO2 for a stream draining a peatland site in the United Kingdom covered a large range, ranging from modern to >1400 yr BP. We investigated whether a proportion of the carbon fixed by plants growing adjacent to the stream was derived from evasion; this would have implications for the cycling of carbon in such streams, and lead to riparian plants having older, rather than contemporary, 14C ages.

13C analysis of riparian plants at the site suggested that up to 20% of the carbon they fixed was derived from evasion. Although the 14C content of the same samples suggested a similar proportion of plant carbon was derived from evaded CO2, the uncertainty in these estimates was greater. Fixation of evaded CO2 was greatest in plants growing within 1 m of the stream. Although the results for this site suggest a small amount of CO2 lost by evasion from the stream surface is incorporated in plant material, it may be a more important factor at other sites characterized by higher evasion rates, lower wind speeds, and different stream bank morphology.

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , 2007 , pp. 993 - 1001
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Arens, NC, Jahren, AH, Amundson, R. 2000. Can C3 plants faithfully record the carbon isotopic composition of atmospheric carbon dioxide? Paleobiology 26(1):137–64.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billett, MF, Palmer, SM, Hope, D, Deacon, C, Storeton-West, R, Hargreaves, KJ, Flechard, C, Fowler, D. 2004. Linking land-atmosphere-stream carbon fluxes in a lowland peatland system. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 18: GB1024, doi:10.1029/2003GB002058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billett, MF, Garnett, MH, Hardie, SML. 2006. A direct method to measure 14CO2 lost by evasion from surface waters. Radiocarbon 48(1):61–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farquhar, GD, Ehleringer, JR, Hubick, KT. 1989. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 40:503–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flechard, CR, Fowler, D. 1998. Atmospheric ammonia at a moorland site II: long-term surface-atmosphere micrometeorological flux measurements. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 124(A):759–91.Google Scholar
Fontugne, M, Maro, D, Baron, Y, Hatté, C, Hebert, D, Douville, E. 2004. 14C sources and distribution in the vicinity of La Hague nuclear reprocessing plant: part I— terrestrial environment. Radiocarbon 46(2):827–30.Google Scholar
Fowler, D, Hargreaves, KJ, MacDonald, JA, Gardiner, B. 1995. Methane and CO2 exchange over peatland and the effects of afforestation. Forestry 68(4):327–34.Google Scholar
Fowler, D, Flechard, CR, Sutton, MA, Storeton-West, RL. 1998. Long term measurements of the land-atmosphere exchange of ammonia over moorland. Atmospheric Environment 32(3):453–9.Google Scholar
Freeman, S, Bishop, P, Bryant, C, Cook, G, Fallick, A, Harkness, D, Metcalfe, S, Scott, M, Scott, R, Summerfield, M. 2004. A new environmental sciences AMS laboratory in Scotland. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:31–4.Google Scholar
Hardie, SML, Garnett, MH, Fallick, AE, Rowland, AP, Ostle, NJ. 2005. Carbon dioxide capture using a zeolite molecular sieve sampling system for isotopic studies (13C and 14C) of respiration. Radiocarbon 47(3):441–51.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, KJ, Milne, R, Cannell, MGR. 2003. Carbon balance of afforested peatland in Scotland. Forestry 76(3):299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemming, D, Yakir, D, Ambus, P, Aurela, M, Besson, C, Black, K, Buchmann, N, Burlett, R, Cescatti, A, Clement, R, Gross, P, Granier, A, Grünwald, T, Havrankova, K, Janous, D, Janssens, IA, Knohl, A, Östner, BK, Kowalski, A, Laurila, T, Mata, C, Marcolla, B, Matteucci, G, Moncrieff, J, Moors, EJ, Osborne, B, Pereira, JS, Pihlatie, M, Pilegaard, K, Ponti, F, Rosova, Z, Rossi, F, Scartazza, A, Vesala, T. 2005. Pan-European δ13C values of air and organic matter from forest ecosystems. Global Change Biology 11(7):1065–93.Google Scholar
Hope, D, Palmer, SM, Billett, MF, Dawson, JJC. 2001. Carbon dioxide and methane evasion from a temperate peatland stream. Limnology and Oceanography 46(4):847–57.Google Scholar
Levin, I, Kromer, B. 2004. The tropospheric 14CO2 level in mid-latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere (1959–2003). Radiocarbon 46(3):1261–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtfouse, E, Lichtfouse, M, Jaffrezic, A. 2003. δ13C values of grasses as a novel indicator of pollution by fossil-fuel-derived greenhouse gas CO2 in urban areas. Environmental Science & Technology 37(1):87–9.Google Scholar
Lichtfouse, E, Lichtfouse, M, Kashgarian, M, Bol, R. 2005. 14C of grasses as an indicator of fossil fuel CO2 production. Environmental Chemistry Letters 3(1):78–81.Google Scholar
Marzaioli, F, Lubritto, C, Battipaglia, G, Passariello, I, Rubino, M, Rogalla, D, Strumia, S, Miglietta, F, D'Onofrio, A, Cotrufo, MF, Terrasi, F. 2005. Reconstruction of past CO2 concentration at a natural CO2 vent site using radiocarbon dating of tree rings. Radiocarbon 47(2):257–63.Google Scholar
Mayorga, E, Aufdenkampe, AK, Masiello, CA, Krusche, AV, Hedges, JI, Quay, PD, Richey, JE, Brown, TA. 2005. Young organic matter as a source of carbon dioxide outgassing from Amazonian rivers. Nature 436(7050):538–41.Google Scholar
Pasquier-Cardin, A, Allard, P, Ferreira, T, Hatté, C, Coutinho, R, Fontugne, M, Jaudon, M. 1999. Magma-derived CO2 emissions recorded in C-14 and C-13 content of plants growing in Furnas caldera, Azores. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 92(1–2):195–207.Google Scholar
Richey, JE, Melack, JM, Aufdenkampe, AK, Ballester, VM, Hess, LL. 2002. Outgassing from Amazonian rivers and wetlands as a large tropical source of atmospheric CO2 . Nature 416(6881):617–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slota, PJ Jr, Jull, AJT, Linick, TW, Toolin, LJ. 1987. Preparation of small samples for 14C accelerator targets by catalytic reduction of CO. Radiocarbon 29(2):303–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–63.Google Scholar
Trumbore, S. 2000. Age of soil organic matter and soil respiration: radiocarbon constraints on belowground C dynamics. Ecological Applications 10(2):399–411.Google Scholar
Xu, S, Anderson, R, Bryant, C, Cook, GT, Dougans, A. Freeman, S, Naysmith, P, Schnabel, C, Scott, EM. 2004. Capabilities of the new SUERC 5MV AMS facility for 14C dating. Radiocarbon 46(1):59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar