Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T23:03:33.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Age and Growth Rate of Giant Cacti: Radiocarbon Dating of the Spines of Cardon (Pachycereus Pringlei)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

Mariana Delgado-Fernández*
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, Instituto Politécnico Nacional 195, La Paz, Baja California Sur 23096, México
Pedro P Garcillán
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, Instituto Politécnico Nacional 195, La Paz, Baja California Sur 23096, México
Exequiel Ezcurra
Affiliation:
University of California-Riverside, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, California 92521, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: mdelgado@pg.cibnor.mx.

Abstract

Age estimation has been a limiting factor in the study of giant columnar cacti. In order to test the feasibility of using radiocarbon methods to estimate the age of the giant cardon cacti (Pachycereus pringlei), we selected six sites spanning the latitudinal and precipitation range of the species in the Baja California peninsula. In each site, we selected four individuals of different heights and sampled a spine from the lowest areole in the stem. The age of the spine was estimated using 14C dating, and the mean annual growth rate of the plant was calculated dividing the height of the lead shoot by the plant’s age. Mean annual growth rate was 0.098 m/yr, with values varying between 0.03 and 0.23 m/yr. Within the range of plants sampled, mean annual growth rates were significantly correlated with the height of the plant (r 2=0.82, P<0.0001), and no other site-specific variable such as precipitation or latitude was a significant predictor of mean annual growth rates. A model integrating mean growth rate versus height showed that relatively small differences in growth rates between plants accumulate during the plants’ lifetime, so that plants of similar size may have very different ages. We conclude that 14C dating provides a robust method to explore the growth and demography of columnar cacti.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2016 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bacilio, M, Vazquez, P, Bashan, Y. 2011. Water versus spacing: a possible growth preference among young individuals of the giant cardon cactus of the Baja California Peninsula. Environmental and Experimental Botany 70:2936.Google Scholar
Bashan, Y, Toledo, G, Holguin, G. 1995. Flat top decay syndrome of the giant cardon cactus (Pachycereus pringlei): description and distribution in Baja California Sur, México. Canadian Journal of Botany 73:683692.Google Scholar
Bullock, SH, Turner, RM, Hastings, JR, Escoto-Rodríguez, M, Ramírez, Z, López, A, Rodríguez-Navarro, JL. 2004. Variance of size–age curves: bootstrapping with autocorrelation. Ecology 85(8):21142117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, SH, Martijena, NE, Webb, RH, Turner, RM. 2005. Twentieth century demographic changes in cirio and cardon in Baja California, México. Journal of Biogeography 32:127143.Google Scholar
CONAGUA (Comisión Nacional del Agua). 2010. Normales Climatológicas por Estación. Online database. Available at http://smn.cna.gob.mx/climatologia/normales/estacion/EstacionesClimatologicas.kmz, Mexico City. Accessed 1 September 2014.Google Scholar
Danzer, S, Drezner, TD. 2010. Demographics of more than 12,000 individuals of keystone species in the northern Sonoran Desert since the mid-1800s. International Journal of Plant Sciences 171(5):538546.Google Scholar
Drezner, TD. 2003. Saguaro (Carnegiea gigantea, Cactaceae) age-height relationship and growth: the development of a general growth curve. American Journal of Botany 90(6):911914.Google Scholar
Drezner, TD. 2014. How long does the giant saguaro live? Life, death and reproduction in the desert. Journal of Arid Enviroments 104:3437.Google Scholar
English, NB, Dettman, DL, Sandquist, DR, Williams, DG. 2007. Past climate changes and ecophysiological responses recorded in the isotope ratios of saguaro cactus spines. Oecologia 154:247258.Google Scholar
English, N, Dettman, D, Sandquist, D, Willams, DG. 2010. Daily to decadal patterns of precipitation, humidity, and photosynthetic physiology recorded in the spines of the columnar cactus, Carnegiea gigantea . Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences 115(2):112.Google Scholar
Hua, Q, Barbetti, M, Rakowski, AZ. 2013. Atmospheric radiocarbon for the period 1950–2010. Radiocarbon 55(4):20592072.Google Scholar
López-Medellín, X, Ezcurra, E, González-Abraham, C, Hak, J, Santiago, LS, Sickman, JO. 2011. Oceanographic anomalies and sea-level rise drive mangroves inland in the Pacific coast of Mexico. Journal of Vegetation Science 22(1):143151.Google Scholar
Mauseth, JD. 2006. Structure–function relationships in highly modified shoots of Cactaceae. Annals of Botany 98(5):901926.Google Scholar
Medel-Narváez, A, de-la-Luz, JL, Freaner-Martinez, F, Molina-Freaner, F. 2006. Patterns of abundance and population structure of Pachycereus pringlei (Cactaceae), a columnar cactus of the Sonoran Desert. Plant Ecology 187:114.Google Scholar
Nerd, A, Raveh, E, Mizrahi, Y. 1993. Adaptations of five columnar cactus species to various conditions in the Negev desert of Israel. Economic Botany 47(3):304311.Google Scholar
Pierson, EA, Turner, RM, Betancourt, JL. 2013. Regional demographic trends from long-term studies of saguaro (Carnegiea gigantea) across the northern Sonoran Desert. Journal of Arid Enviroments 88:5769.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2015. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at https://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Reimer, P, Brown, T, Reimer, R. 2004. Discussion: reporting and calibration of post-bomb 14C data. Radiocarbon 46(3):12991304.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Brown, DM, Buck, CE, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatté, C, Heaton, TJ, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. Selection and treatment of data for radiocarbon calibration: an update to the International Calibration (IntCal) criteria. Radiocarbon 55(4):19231945.Google Scholar
Southon, J, Santos, G. 2004. Ion source development at the KCCAMS Facility, University of California, Irvine. Radiocarbon 46(1):3339.Google Scholar
Steenbergh, WF, Lowe, Ch. 1977. Ecology of Saguaro: Reproduction, Germination, Establishment, Growth and Survival of the Young Plant. National Park Service Scientific Monograph Series. Washington, DC: Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
Suzán-Azpiri, H, Sosa, V. 2006. Comparative performance of the giant cardon cactus (Pachycereus pringlei) seedlings under two leguminous nurse plant species. Journal of Arid Environments 65:351362.Google Scholar
Turner, RM, Bowers, JE, Burgess, TL. 1995. Sonoran Desert Plants: An Ecological Atlas. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Turner, RM, Webb, RH, Bowers, JE, Hastings, JR. 2003. The Changing Mile Revisited: An Ecological Study of Vegetation Change with Time in the Lower Mile of an Arid and Semiarid Region. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. 334 p.Google Scholar