Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:45:14.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preparation of Graphite Targets from Small Marine Samples for AMS Radiocarbon Measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Laval Liong Wee Kwong
Affiliation:
International Atomic Energy Agency, Marine Environment Laboratory, MC 98000 Monaco.
Pavel P Povinec*
Affiliation:
International Atomic Energy Agency, Marine Environment Laboratory, MC 98000 Monaco.
J A Timothy Jull
Affiliation:
NSF Arizona AMS Facility, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA.
*
Corresponding author. Email address: p.povinec@iaea.org.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A vacuum sample processing line was set up and methods were developed for the determination of radiocarbon in small-volume seawater and biota samples. Seawater samples (500 mL per borosilicate glass bottle and poisoned with HgCl2) were acidified with 5 mL concentrated hydrochloric acid. Pure N2 was used as a carrier gas to strip CO2 from the samples for 10 min in a circulation mode. After purification through several water traps, the CO2 was isolated cryogenically. Using Na2CO3 standard solutions, recovery yields were calculated superior to 95 ± 5%. Freeze-dried marine biota samples were thoroughly mixed with Cu(II)O and combusted at 900°. The CO2 was purified by passing through Ag wool and Cu granules at 450° before reduction to graphite. Finally, graphite was synthesized using Zn dust heated to 450° in the presence of an Fe catalyst at 550°. Although this method takes about 8 hr (synthesis done overnight), the advantage is that no water vapor by-product is formed to hinder the reaction. The graphite yields, measured both by gravimetric methods and by pressure readings, were 95 ± 5%. Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) measurements were carried out at the NSF-Arizona AMS Facility. Results for water samples from the northwest Pacific Ocean are reported which are in agreement with data reported elsewhere.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Aramaki, T, Mizushima, T, Kuji, T, Povinec, PP, Togawa, O. 2001. Distribution of radiocarbon in the southwestern North Pacific. Radiocarbon 43(2B):857–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bard, E, Arnold, M, Toggweiler, JR, Maurice, P, Duplessy, J-C. 1989. Bomb 14C in the Indian Ocean measured by accelerator mass spectrometry: oceanographic implications. Radiocarbon 31(3):510–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broecker, WS, Peacock, SL, Walker, S, Weiss, R, Fahrbach, E, Schroeder, M, Mikolajewicz, U, Heinze, C, Key, R, Peng, TH, Rubin, S. 1998. How much deep water is formed in the Southern Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research 103:15,83344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchuladze, AA, Pagava, SV, Povinec, PP, Togonoidze, GI, Usacev, S. 1980. Radiocarbon variations with the 11-year solar cycle during the last century. Nature 287:320–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushan, R, Chakraborty, S, Krishnaswami, S. 1994. Physical Research Laboratory (Chemistry) radiocarbon date list 1. Radiocarbon 36(2):251–6.Google Scholar
Calf, GE. 1978. A procedure for the preparation of benzene from 14C NBS oxalic acid standard. Radiocarbon 20(2):169170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörr, H, Munnich, KO. 1980. Carbon-14 and carbon-13 in soil CO. Radiocarbon 22(3):909–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorczyca, Z, Jelen, K, Kuc, T. 1998. Gas counting system for 14C dating of small samples in the Krakow Laboratory. Radiocarbon 40(1):129–36.Google Scholar
Jull, AJT, Linick, TW, Toolin, LJ. 1987. Preparation of small samples for 14C accelerator targets by catalytic reduction of CO. Radiocarbon 29(2):303–6.Google Scholar
Key, RM, Quay, PD, Schlosser, P, McNichol, AP, von Reden, KF, Schneider, RJ, Elder, KL, Stuiver, M, Östlund, HG. 2002. WOCE Radiocarbon IV: Pacific Ocean results; P10, P13N, P14C, P18, P19 & S4P. Radiocarbon 44(1):239392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, E, Elliott, G, Fallon, J, Fink, D, Hotchkis, MAC, Hua, Q, Jacobsen, G, Lee, P, Smith, AM, Tuniz, C, Zoppi, U. 2000. AMS at ANTARES–the first 10 years. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172:95–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNichol, AP, Jones, GA, Hutton, DL, Gagnon, AR. 1994. The rapid preparation of seawater $SGCO2 for radiocarbon analysis at the National Ocean Sciences AMS Facility. Radiocarbon 36(2):237–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nydal, R, Giselfoss, J, Skjelvan, I, Skogseth, F. 1992. 14C profiles in the Norwegian and Greenland Seas by conventional and AMS measurements. Radiocarbon 34(3):717–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Östlund, HG, Stuiver, M. 1980. GEOSECS Pacific radiocarbon. Radiocarbon 22(1):2553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Östlund, HG, Craig, H, Broecker, WS, Spenser, D. 1987. GEOSECS Atlantic, Pacific and Indian Ocean Expeditions. Vol. 7. Shorebased Data and Graphics. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Östlund, HG, Rooth, CGH. 1990. The North Atlantic tritium and radiocarbon transients 1972–1983. Journal of Geophysical Research 95(C11):20,14765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povinec, PP. 1992. 14C gas counting: Is there still a future? Radiocarbon 34(3):406–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povinec, PP. 1994. Underground low-level counting. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Low-level Measurements of Radioactivity in the Environment. Singapore: World Scientific. p 113–39.Google Scholar
Povinec, PP, Oregioni, B, Jull, AJT, Kieser, WE, Zhao, X-L. 2000. AMS measurements of 14C and 129I in seawater around radioactive waste dump sites. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172:672–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slota, PJ, Jull, AJT, Linick, TW, Toolin, LJ. 1987. Preparation of small samples for 14C accelerator targets by catalytic reduction of CO2 . Radiocarbon 29(2):303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Quay, PD, Östlund, HG. 1983. Abyssal water carbon-14 distribution and the age of the world oceans. Science 219:849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vogel, JS, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE, Brown, TA. 1984. Performance of catalytically condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5:289–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar