Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:40:25.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon and Stable Carbon Analysis of Dissolved Methane and Carbon Dioxide from the Profile of a Raised Peat Bog

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

M H Garnett ,
S M L Hardie  and
C Murray
M H Garnett*
Affiliation:
NERC Radiocarbon Facility (Environment), Rankine Avenue, East Kilbride G75 0QF, United Kingdom.
S M L Hardie*
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, Joseph Black Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom.
C Murray
Affiliation:
NERC Radiocarbon Facility (Environment), Rankine Avenue, East Kilbride G75 0QF, United Kingdom.
*
Corresponding author. Email: M.Garnett@nercrcl.gla.ac.uk.
Present address: Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, United Kingdom.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We developed and tested a new method to separate CO2 and CH4 from bulk gas samples for radiocarbon and stable-carbon analysis that utilizes a zeolite molecular sieve. To validate the technique, tests were performed using a suite of standard gases, composed of CO2 and CH4 of distinctly different isotopic composition. We employed the method to investigate the carbon isotopic composition of samples of dissolved CO2 and CH4 collected in situ from the near surface to deep layers of an ombrotrophic raised peat bog. Results showed that the age of both the CO2 and CH4 components of the dissolved gases increased with depth from ≃0–300 BP at 0.25 m to ≃4000 BP at 4 m. CH4 was mainly similar or slightly older in age compared to CO2, with the greatest difference in ages occurring at 1 m depth where CH4 was older by 430–615 yr. The δ13C values of CO2 increased with depth from −12.4‰ and −8.0‰ at 0.25 m to +6.9‰ and +8.3‰ at 4 m, whereas the δ13C of CH4 stayed in the range −58.4‰ to −70.6‰. The 14C results from the deepest layers are consistent with a similar source for both gases. 14C ages for the CO2 component were younger compared to CH4, within the shallower depths of the peat bog (≤1 m) and demonstrate the incorporation of acrotelm-derived respired CO2 into the catotelm.

Type
Soils and Sediments
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , 2011 , pp. 71 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

REFERENCES

Aravena, R, Warner, BG, Charman, DJ, Belyea, LR, Mathur, SP, Dinel, H. 1993. Carbon isotopic composition of deep carbon gases in an ombrogenous peatland, northwestern Ontario, Canada. Radiocarbon 35(2):271–6.Google Scholar
BDH. No date. ‘Union Carbide’ molecular sieves for selective adsorption. BDH Chemicals Ltd, UK.Google Scholar
Chanton, J, Glaser, PH, Chasar, LS, Burdige, DJ, Hines, ME, Siegel, DI, Tremblay, LB, Cooper, WT. 2008. Radiocarbon evidence for the importance of surface vegetation on fermentation and methanogenesis in contrasting types of boreal peatlands. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 22: GB4022, doi:10.1029/2008GB003274.Google Scholar
Chapman, SJ, Thurlow, M. 1996. The influence of climate on CO2 and CH4 emissions from organic soils. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 79(4):205–17.Google Scholar
Charman, DJ, Aravena, R, Warner, BG. 1994. Carbon dynamics in a forested peatland in north-eastern Ontario, Canada. Journal of Ecology 82(1):55–62.Google Scholar
Charman, DJ, Aravena, R, Bryant, CL, Harkness, DD. 1999. Carbon isotopes in peat, DOC, CO2, and CH4 in a Holocene peatland on Dartmoor, southwest England. Geology 27(6):539–42.Google Scholar
Chasar, L, Chanton, J, Glaser, PH, Siegel, DI, Rivers, J. 2000. Radiocarbon and stable carbon isotopic evidence for transport and transformation of dissolved organic carbon, dissolved inorganic carbon, and CH4 in a northern Minnesota peatland. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 14(4):1095–108.Google Scholar
Clymo, RS, Bryant, CL. 2008. Diffusion and mass flow of dissolved carbon dioxide, methane, and dissolved organic carbon in a 7-m deep raised peat bog. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 72(8):2048–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, D, Liu, C-L, Riley, KM. 1988. Microbial methane in the shallow Paleozoic sediments and glacial deposits of Illinois, USA. Chemical Geology 71(1–3):23–40.Google Scholar
Freeman, S, Bishop, P, Bryant, C, Cook, G, Dougans, D, Ertunc, T, Fallick, A, Ganeshram, R, Maden, C, Naysmith, P, Schnabel, C, Scott, M, Summerfield, M, Xu, S. 2007. The SUERC AMS laboratory after 3 years. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):66–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnett, MH, Hardie, SML. 2009. Isotope (14C and 13C) analysis of deep peat CO2 using a passive sampling technique. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 41(12):2477–83.Google Scholar
Garnett, MH, Hartley, IP. 2010. A passive sampling method for radiocarbon analysis of atmospheric CO2 using molecular sieve. Atmospheric Environment 44(7):877–83.Google Scholar
Garnett, MH, Hartley, IP, Hopkins, DW, Sommerkorn, M, Wookey, PA. 2009. A passive sampling method for radiocarbon analysis of soil respiration using molecular sieve. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 41(7):1450–6.Google Scholar
Gulliksen, S, Scott, M. 1995. Report of the TIRI workshop, Saturday 13 August, 1994. Radiocarbon 37(2):820–1.Google Scholar
Gut, A, Blatter, A, Fahrni, M, Lehmann, BE, Neftel, A, Staffelbach, T. 1998. A new membrane tube technique (METT) for continuous gas measurements in soils. Plant and Soil 198(1):79–88.Google Scholar
Hardie, SML, Garnett, MH, Fallick, AE, Rowland, AP, Ostle, NJ. 2005. Carbon dioxide capture using a zeolite molecular sieve sampling system for isotopic studies (13C and 14C) of respiration. Radiocarbon 47(3):441–51.Google Scholar
Hornibrook, ERC, Longstaffe, FJ, Fyfe, WS. 1997. Spatial distribution of microbial methane production pathways in temperate zone wetland soils: stable carbon and hydrogen isotope evidence. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 61(4):745–53.Google Scholar
Lansdown, JM, Quay, PD, King, SL. 1992. CH4 production via CO2 reduction in a temperate bog: a source of 13C-depleted CH4 . Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 56(9):3493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nykänen, H, Heikkinen, JEP, Pirinen, L, Tiilikainen, K, Martikainen, PJ. 2003. Annual CO2 exchange and CH4 fluxes on a subarctic palsa mire during climatically different years. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 17:1018, doi:10.1029/2002GB001861.Google Scholar
Slota, PJ Jr, Jull, AJT, Linick, TW, Toolin, LJ. 1987. Preparation of small samples for 14C accelerator targets by catalytic reduction of CO. Radiocarbon 29(2):303–6.Google Scholar
Steinmann, P, Eilrich, B, Leuenberger, M, Burns, SJ. 2008. Stable carbon isotope composition and concentrations of CO2 and CH4 in the deep catotelm of a peat bog. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 72(24):6015–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–63.Google Scholar
Waldron, S, Hall, AJ, Fallick, AE. 1999. Enigmatic stable isotope dynamics of deep peat methane. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 13(1):93–100.Google Scholar
Whiticar, MJ, Faber, E, Schoell, M. 1986. Biogenic methane formation in marine and freshwater environments: CO2 reduction vs. acetate fermentation - isotope evidence. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 50(5):693–709.Google Scholar