Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:00:37.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Robust Radiocarbon Dating of Wood Samples by High-Sensitivity Liquid Scintillation Spectroscopy in the 50–70 kyr Age Range

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Alan G Hogg ,
L Keith Fifield ,
Jonathan G Palmer ,
Chris S M Turney  and
Rex Galbraith
Alan G Hogg*
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Laboratory, University of Waikato, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand
L Keith Fifield
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia
Jonathan G Palmer
Affiliation:
Gondwana Tree Ring Laboratory, P.O. Box 64, Tai Tapu, Canterbury 8150, New Zealand
Chris S M Turney
Affiliation:
GeoQuEST Research Centre, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
Rex Galbraith
Affiliation:
Department of Statistical Science, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
*
Corresponding author. Email: alan.hogg@waikato.ac.nz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although high-sensitivity liquid scintillation (LS) spectroscopy is theoretically capable of producing finite radiocarbon ages in the 50,000- to 70,000-yr range, there is little evidence in the literature that meaningful dates in this time period have been obtained. The pressing need to undertake calibration beyond 26 kyr has resulted in the regular publication of 14C results in excess of 50 kyr, yet very little effort has been made to demonstrate their accuracy or precision. There is a paucity of systematic studies of the techniques required to produce reliable dates close to background and the methods needed to assess contamination from either in situ sources or laboratory handling and processing. We have studied the requirements for producing accurate and reliable dates beyond 50 kyr. Laboratory procedures include optimization of LS spectrometers to obtain low and stable non-14C background count rates, use of low-background counting vials, large benzene volumes, long counting times, and preconditioning of vacuum lines. We also discuss the need for multiple analyses of a suitable material containing no original 14C (background blank) and the application of an appropriate statistical model to compensate for variability in background contamination beyond counting statistics. Accurate and reproducible finite ages >60 kyr are indeed possible by high-sensitivity LS spectroscopy, but require corroborating background blank data to be defensible.

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , 2007 , pp. 379 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Devine, JM, Haas, H. 1987. Scintillation counter performance at the SMU radiocarbon laboratory. Radiocarbon 29(1):12–7.Google Scholar
Galbraith, R. 2005. Statistics for Fission Track Analysis. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: Chapman & Hall / CRC. 240 p.Google Scholar
Gupta, SK, Polach, HA. 1985. Radiocarbon Dating Practices at ANU. Canberra: Radiocarbon Laboratory, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, Canberra. 176 p.Google Scholar
Hogg, AG. 1993. Counting performance and design of 0.3-mL to 10-mL synthetic silica liquid scintillation vials for low-level 14C determination. In: Noakes, JE, Polach, HA, Schönhofer, F, editors. Liquid Scintillation Spectrometry 1992. Tucson: Radiocarbon. p 135–42.Google Scholar
Hogg, AG. 2004. Towards achieving low background levels in routine dating by liquid scintillation spectrometry. Radiocarbon 46(1):123–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, AG, Noakes, JE. 1992. Evaluation of high-purity synthetic silica vials in active and passive vial holders for liquid scintillation counting of benzene. Radiocarbon 34(3):394–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, AG, Polach, H, Robertson, S, Noakes, J. 1991. Application of high-purity synthetic quartz vials to liquid scintillation low-level 14C counting of benzene. In: Ross, H, Noakes, JE, Spaulding, JD, editors. Liquid Scintillation Counting and Organic Scintillators. Chelsea, Michigan, USA: Lewis Publishers, p 123–31.Google Scholar
Hogg, AG, Fifield, LK, Turney, CSM, Palmer, JG, Galbraith, R, Baillie, MGL. 2006. Dating ancient wood by high-sensitivity liquid scintillation counting and accelerator mass spectrometry—pushing the boundaries. Quaternary Geochronology 1(4):241–8.Google Scholar
Hoper, ST, McCormac, FG, Hogg, AG, Higham, TFG, Head, MJ. 1998. Evaluation of wood pretreatments on oak and cedar. Radiocarbon 40(1):45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, Q, Barbetti, M, Worbes, M, Head, J, Levchenko, V. 1999. Review of radiocarbon data from atmospheric and tree ring samples for the period 1945–1997 AD. IAWA Journal 20(3):261–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalin, RM, Long, A. 1989. Radiocarbon dating with the Quantulus in an underground counting laboratory: performance and background sources. Radiocarbon 31(3):359–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A, Kalin, RM. 1992. High-sensitivity radiocarbon dating in the 50,000 to 70,000 BP range without isotopic enrichment. Radiocarbon 34(3):351–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marra, MJ, Alloway, BV, Newnham, RM. 2006. Paleoenvironmental reconstruction of a well-preserved Stage 7 forest sequence catastrophically buried by basaltic eruptive deposits, northern New Zealand. Quaternary Science Reviews 25(17–18):2143–61.Google Scholar
McCormac, FG, Kalin, RM, Long, A. 1993. Radiocarbon dating beyond 50,000 years by liquid scintillation counting. In: Noakes, JE, Polach, HA, Schönhofer, F, editors. Liquid Scintillation Spectrometry 1992. Tucson: Radiocarbon. p 125–33.Google Scholar
Newnham, RM, Alloway, BV. 2001. The last interglacial/glacial cycle in Taranaki, western North Island, New Zealand: a palynostratigraphic model. In: Goodman, DK, Clarke, RT, editors. Proceedings of the IX International Palynological Congress. Houston 1996. Dallas: American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation. p 411–22.Google Scholar
Pearson, GW. 1979. Precise 14C measurement by liquid scintillation counting. Radiocarbon 21(1):1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polach, HA, Kojola, H, Nurmi, J, Soini, E. 1984. Multiparameter liquid scintillation spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5(2):439–42.Google Scholar
Polach, H, Calf, G, Harkness, D, Hogg, AG, Kaihola, L, Robertson, S. 1988. Performance of new technology liquid scintillation counters for 14C dating. Nuclear Geophysics 2:75–9.Google Scholar
Stuiver, MS, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar